Rats were trained in a spatial T-maze discrimination either in a drugged (D=pentobarbital, 17.5 mg/kg) or in a non-drugged (N=saline) state (drug discrimination learning). Either of two external discriminative stimulus sets (light vs complete darkness) was consistently associated with the D or N state. When tested in the presence of the external stimulus previously associated with training in the D state, the animals made more drug-appropriate choices when tested with low pentobarbital doses as compared to testing in the external stimulus condition previously associated with the N state. This was reflected both in the ED50 values and the slopes of the dose-generalization gradients. The gradients of the controls were intermediate to those of the experimental rats. The present data suggest a new approach for studying interactions between controlling features in environmental events and the internal state.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Price includes VAT for USA
Subscribe to journal
Immediate online access to all issues from 2019. Subscription will auto renew annually.
This is the net price. Taxes to be calculated in checkout.
Archer T, Sjödén P-O, Nilsson L-G (1983) Contextual control of tasteaversion conditioning and extinction. In: Balsam PD, Tomie A (eds) Context and learning. LEA Hillsdale (in press)
Barry H, III (1974) Classification of drugs according to their discriminable effects in rats. Fed Proc 33:1814–1824
Catania AC (1971) Discriminative stimulus functions of drugs: Interpretation. In: Thompson T, Pickens R (eds) Stimulus properties of drugs. Appleton Century Crofts, New York, pp 149–155
Colpaert FC, Rosecrans JA (eds) (1978) Stimulus properties of drugs: Ten years of progress. Elsevier, Amsterdam
Connelly JF, Connelly JM, Epps JO (1973) Disruption of dissociated learning in a discrimination paradigm by emotionally important stimuli. Psychopharmacologia 30:275–282
Duncan PM, Phillips J, Reints J, Schechter MD (1979) Interaction between discrimination of drug states and external stimuli. Psychopharmacology 61:105–106
Heinemann EG, Chase S (1975) Stimulus generalization In: Estes WK (ed) Handbook of learning and cognitive processes: vol 2—Conditioning and behavior theory. LEA, Hillsdale, pp 305–349
Järbe TUC, Sterner U, Hjerpe C (1981) Conditioning of an interoceptive drug stimulus to different exteroceptive contexts. Psychopharmacology 73:23–26
Litchfield JT, Wilcoxon F (1949) A simplified method for evaluating dose-effect experiments. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 96:99–113
Logue AW (1979) Taste aversion and the generality of the laws of learning. Psychol Bull 86:276–296
Mackintosh NJ (1974) The psychology of animal learning. Academic, New York, pp 579–589
Overton DA (1971) Discriminative control of behavior by drug states. In: Thompson T, Pickens R (eds) Stimulus properties of drugs. Appleton Century Crofts, New York, pp 87–110
Seligman MEP, Hager JL (eds) (1972) Biological boundaries of learning. Appleton Century Crofts, New York
Seligman MEP (1970) On the generality of the laws of learning. Psychol Rev 77:406–418
Siegel S (1956) Nonparametric statistics for the behavioral sciences. McGraw-Hill, New York
About this article
Cite this article
Järbe, T.U.C., Laaksonen, T. & Svensson, R. Influence of exteroceptive contextual conditions upon internal drug stimulus control. Psychopharmacology 80, 31–34 (1983). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00427490
- Pentobarbital drug-stimulus
- Exteroceptive-interoceptive stimulus control