Springer Nature is making SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 research free. View research | View latest news | Sign up for updates

Concurrent etonitazene and water intake in rats: Role of taste, olfaction, and auditory stimuli

  • 29 Accesses

  • 29 Citations

Abstract

Etonitazene and water were concurrently available to four rats during daily 1 h sessions in operant conditioning chambers equipped with two levers and two liquid dippers. A food-induced training procedure was used whereby etonitazene drinking was rapidly established by presenting rats with gradually increased drug concentrations with their daily food ration. When food was subsequently removed from the session and given post-session, etonitazene responding persisted. The rats were subsequently trained on fixed-ratio (FR) schedules with concurrent access to etonitazene and water. The number of dipper presentations compared with etonitazene concentrations (0.078–10.0 μg/ml) resulted in a typical inverted U-shaped function while etonitazene intake (μg/kg) increased directly with concentration. After drinking large quantities of etonitazene the rats showed ataxia, hyper-activity, and stereotypy. Extinction tests demonstrated that rats could discriminate between etonitazene and water on the basis of one dipper full of each liquid; the amount of etonitazene in one dipper was 0.0078 μg. Further tests showed that this discrimination was based on taste or immediate post-ingestional feedback rather than olfactory cues. An auditory stimulus was presented concurrently with responses on the drug lever; however, there was no difference in responding for the drug in the presence or absence of this stimulus except at the lowest concentration. After the extinction tests, when the lowest drug concentration was again available with concurrent water, responding was substantially higher in the presence of stimulus associated with availability of etonitazene. The results extend previous work on oral narcotic intake to a lever-press concurrent choice procedure which is sensitive to reinforcing effects of the drug at low concentrations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Aigner, T. G., Balster, R. L.: Choice behavior in rhesus monkeys: Cocaine versus food. Science 201, 534–535 (1978)

  2. Carroll, M. E., Meisch, R. A.: Etonitazene as a reinforcer: Oral intake of etonitazene by rhesus monkeys. Psychopharmacology 59, 225–229 (1978)

  3. Chernov, H. I., Abrose, F. G., Plummer, A. J.: Pattern of consumption of etonitazene solutions by naive rats. Arch. Int. Pharmacodyn. Ther. 175, 309–318 (1968)

  4. Chernov, H. I., Barbaz, B. S., Boshek, R. L., Feist, M. M.: Age and lack and handling as factors in the consumption of an etonitazene solution by naive rats. Arch. Int. Pharmacodyn. Ther. 195, 231–239 (1972)

  5. Claghorn, J. L., Ordy, J. M., Nagy, A.: Spontaneous opiate addiction in rhesus monkeys. Science 149, 440–441 (1965)

  6. Garcia, J., Koelling, R. A.: Relation of cue to consequence in avoidance learning. Psychon. Sci. 4, 123–124 (1966)

  7. Garcia, J., McGowan, B. K., Ervin, F. R., Koelling, R. A.: Cues: Their relative effectiveness as a function of the reinforcer. Science 100, 794–795 (1968)

  8. Goldberg, S. R.: Stimuli associated with drug injections as events that control behavior. Pharmacol. Rev. 27, 325–342 (1975)

  9. Iglauer, C., Woods, J. H.: Concurrent performances: Reinforcement by different doses of cocaine in rhesus monkeys. J. Exp. Anal. Behav. 22, 179–196 (1974)

  10. Johanson, C. E.: Effects of electric shock on responding maintained by cocaine injections in a choice procedure in the rhesus monkey. Psychopharmacology 53, 277–282 (1977)

  11. Johanson, C. E.: Pharmacological and environmental variables affecting drug preference in rhesus monkeys. Pharmacol. Rev. 27, 343–355 (1975)

  12. Johanson, C. E., Schuster, C. R.: A choice procedure for drug reinforcers: Cocaine and methylphenidate in the rhesus monkey. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 193, 676–688 (1975)

  13. Johanson, C. E., Schuster, C. R.: A comparison of cocaine and diethylproprion under two different schedules of drug presentation. In: Cocaine and other stimulants, E. H. Ellinwood, M. M. Kilbey, eds., pp. 545–570. New York: Plenum 1976

  14. Khavari, K. A., Risner, M. E.: Establishment of morphine preference in the rat. Psychon. Sci. 26, 141–142 (1972)

  15. Kumar, R., Steinberg, H., Stolerman, I. P.: Inducing a preference for morphine in rats without premedication. Nature 218, 564–565 (1968)

  16. Leander, J. D., McMillan, D. E.: Schedule-induced narcotic ingestion. Pharmacol. Rev. 27, 475–487 (1975)

  17. Lewis, M. J., Margules, D. L., Ward, L. B., Jr.: Opioid-reinforced operant behavior: Selective suppression by alpha-methyl-paratyrosine. J. Comp. Physiol. Psychol. 88, 519–527 (1975)

  18. McMillan, D. E., Leander J. K.: Schedule-induced oral self-administration of etonitazene. Pharmacol. Biochem. Behav. 4, 137–141 (1976)

  19. Meisch, R. A.: Ethanol self-administration: Infrahuman studies. In: Advances in behavioral pharmacology, T. Thompson, P. B. Dews, eds., pp. 35–84. New York: Academic Press 1977

  20. Meisch, R. A., Beardsley, P.: Ethanol as a reinforcer for rats: Effects of concurrent access to water and alternate positions of water and ethanol. Psychopharmacologia (Berl.) 43, 12–23 (1975)

  21. Meisch, R. A., Stark, L. J.: Establishment of etonitazene as a reinforcer for rats by use of schedule-induced drinking. Pharmacol. Biochem. Behav. 7, 195–203 (1977)

  22. Meisch, R. A., Thompson, T.: Ethanol as a reinforcer: Effects of fixed-ratio size and food deprivation. Psychopharmacologia (Berl.) 26, 171–183 (1973)

  23. Meisch, R. A., Thompson, T.: Ethanol intake as a function of concentration during food deprivation and satiation. Pharmacol. Biochem. Behav. 2, 589–596 (1974)

  24. Myers, R. D., Veale, W. L.: The determinants of alcohol preference in animals. In: The biology of alcoholism, vol. II, B. Kissin, H. Begleiter, eds., pp. 131–168. New York: Plenum 1972

  25. Nichols, J. R., Davis, W. M.: Drug addiction II variation of addition. J. Am. Pharm. Assoc. 48, 259–262 (1959)

  26. Parker, L. F., Radow, B. L.: Morphine-like physical dependence: A pharmacologic method for drug assessement using the rat. Pharmacol. Biochem. Behav. 2, 613–618 (1974)

  27. Pickens, R., Meisch, R. A., Thompson, T.: Drug self-administration: An analysis of the reinforcing effects of drugs. In: Handbook of psychopharmacology, vol. 12, L. L. Iversen, S. E. Iversen, S. H. Snyder, eds., pp. 1–37. New York: Plenum 1978

  28. Schuster, C. R., Woods, J. H.: The conditioned reinforcing effects of stimuli associated with morphine reinforcement. Int. J. Addict. 3, 223–230 (1968)

  29. Wikler, A., Pescor, F. T.: Classical conditioning of a morphine abstinence phenomenon, reinforcement of opioid drinking behavior and “relapse” in morphine-addicted rats. Psychopharmacologia (Berl.) 10, 255–284 (1967)

  30. Wikler, A., Pescor, F. T.: Persistence of “relapse-tendencies” of rats previously made physically dependent on morphine. Psychopharmacologia (Berl.) 16, 375–384 (1970)

  31. Wikler, A., Martin, W. R., Pescor, F. T., Eades, C. G.: Factors regulating oral consumption of an opioid (etonitazene) by morphine-addicted rats. Psychopharmacologia (Berl.) 5, 55–76 (1963)

Download references

Author information

Correspondence to Marilyn E. Caroll.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Caroll, M.E., Meisch, R.A. Concurrent etonitazene and water intake in rats: Role of taste, olfaction, and auditory stimuli. Psychopharmacology 64, 1–7 (1979). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00427336

Download citation

Key words

  • Etonitazene
  • Etonitazene reinforcement
  • Concurrent schedules
  • Choice procedures
  • Rats
  • Taste
  • Olfaction
  • Auditory stimuli
  • Discriminative stimuli
  • Conditioned reinforcers
  • Fixed-ratio schedules