Psychopharmacologia

, Volume 38, Issue 2, pp 159–171 | Cite as

Differential effects of chlordiazepoxide and d-amphetamine on responding maintained by a DRL schedule of reinforcement

  • D. J. Sanger
  • Marilyn Key
  • D. E. Blackman
Animal Studies
Received:
Revised:

Abstract

Rats pressed a lever and obtained food pellets on a schedule of differential reinforcement of low rate (DRL) which required that responses were spaced at least 15 sec apart in order for them to produce reinforcement. When responding had stabilised at slow and steady rates the effects of d-amphetamine and chlordiazepoxide were assessed. Low doses of both drugs increased response rates while higher doses decreased them. Reinforcement frequency showed a dose related decrease after both drugs. When interresponse times (IRTs) were analysed it was found that both drugs shifted the peak of the distribution towards shorter IRTs but that chlordiazepoxide also produced a specific increase in the percentage of responses after very short IRTs (bursts). When IRTs were divided into those following a reinforced response (hit) and those following a non-reinforced response (miss) it was found that bursts normally followed only misses and chlordiazepoxide consistently increased the number of bursts following misses only. Amphetamine did not affect bursts in any consistent way.

Key words

Chlordiazepoxide d-Amphetamine DRL Responding 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Appel, J. B.: Effects of LSD on time based schedules of reinforcement. Psychopharmacologia (Berl.) 21, 174–186 (1971)Google Scholar
  2. Carey, R. J.: Disruption of timing behaviour following amphetamine withdrawal. Physiol. Psychol. 1, 9–12 (1973)Google Scholar
  3. Carter, D. E., Bruno, L. J. J.: On the discriminative function of the reinforcing stimulus. Psychon. Sci. 11, 21–22 (1968)Google Scholar
  4. Ferraro, D. P., Grilly, D. M., Lynch, W. C.: Effects of marihuana extract on the operant behaviour of chimpanzees. Psychopharmacologia (Berl.) 22, 333–351 (1971)Google Scholar
  5. Fontaine, O., Richelle, M.: Antagonismes des effets centraux et peripheriques de la tremorine par deux parasympathicolytiques l'atropine et la scopolamine. Psychopharmacologia (Berl.) 11, 154–164 (1967)Google Scholar
  6. Gibson, D. A.: Effects of d-amphetamine on multiple schedule performance in the pigeon. Psychon. Sci. 7, 3–4 (1967)Google Scholar
  7. Harzem, P.: Temporal discrimination. In: Animal Discrimination Learning, R. M. Gilbert and N. S. Sutherland, Eds., pp. 299–334. London: Academic Press 1969Google Scholar
  8. Kelleher, R. T., Fry, W., Deegan, J., Cook, L.: Effects of meprobamate on operant behaviour in rats. J. Pharmacol. exp. Ther. 133, 271–280 (1961)Google Scholar
  9. Kornetsky, C.: A comparison of the effects of desipramine and imipramine on two schedules of reinforcement. Neuropharmacol. 4, 13–16 (1965)Google Scholar
  10. Kramer, T. J., Rilling, M.: Differential reinforcement of low rates: a selective critique. Psychol. Bull. 74, 225–254 (1970)Google Scholar
  11. MacDougall, J. M., Van Hoesen, G. W., Mitchell, J. C.: Development of post SR and post non SR DRL performance and its retention following septal lesions in rats. Psychon. Sci. 16, 45–46 (1969).Google Scholar
  12. McMillan, D. E., Campbell, R. J.: Effects of d-amphetamine and chlordiazepoxide on spaced responding in pigeons. J. exp. Anal. Behav. 14, 177–184 (1970)Google Scholar
  13. Millenson, J. R.: A programming language for on-line control of psychological experiments. Behav. Sci. 16, 248–256 (1971)Google Scholar
  14. Morrison, C. F.: A comparison of the effects of nicotine and amphetamine on DRL performance in the rat. Psychopharmacologia (Berl.) 12, 176–180 (1968)Google Scholar
  15. Pradhan, S. N., Dutta, S. N.: Comparative effects of nicotine and amphetamine on timing behaviour in rats. Neuropharmacol. 9, 9–16 (1970)Google Scholar
  16. Pradhan, S. N., Bailey, P. T., Ghosh, P.: Effects of δ 9-tetrahydrocannabinol on a timing behaviour in rats. Psychon. Sci. 27, 179–181 (1972)Google Scholar
  17. Richelle, M.: Temporal regulation of behaviour and inhibition. In: Inhibition and Learning. R. A. Boakes and M. S. Halliday, Eds., pp. 229–251. London: Academic Press 1972Google Scholar
  18. Richelle, M., Xhenseval, B., Fontaine, O., Thone, L.: Action of chlordiazepoxide on two types of temporal conditioning in rats. Int. J. Neuropharmacol. 1, 381–391 (1962)Google Scholar
  19. Schuster, C. R., Zimmermann, J.: Timing behaviour during prolonged treatment with dl-amphetamine. J. exp. Anal. Behav. 4, 327–330 (1961)Google Scholar
  20. Segal, E. F.: Effects of dl-amphetamine under concurrent VI DRL reinforcement. J. exp. Anal. Behav. 5, 105–112 (1962)Google Scholar
  21. Sidman, M.: Technique for assessing the effects of drugs on timing behaviour. Science 122, 925 (1955)Google Scholar
  22. Sidman, M.: Time discrimination and behavioural interaction in a free operant situation. J. comp. physiol. Psychol. 49, 469–473 (1956)Google Scholar
  23. Webster, C. D., Willinsky, M. D., Herring, B. S., Walters, G. C.: Effects of l-δ 1 THC on temporally spaced responding and discriminated Sidman avoidance behaviour in rats. Nature (Lond.) 232, 498 (1971)Google Scholar
  24. Weiss, B., Gott, C. T.: A microanalysis of drug effects on fixed-ratio performance in pigeons. J. Pharmacol. exp. Ther. 180, 189–202 (1972)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1974

Authors and Affiliations

  • D. J. Sanger
    • 1
  • Marilyn Key
    • 1
  • D. E. Blackman
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of PsychologyUniversity of BirminghamBirminghamEngland

Personalised recommendations