Archives of Microbiology

, Volume 136, Issue 4, pp 254–261 | Cite as

Methanococcus jannaschii sp. nov., an extremely thermophilic methanogen from a submarine hydrothermal vent

  • W. J. Jones
  • J. A. Leigh
  • F. Mayer
  • C. R. Woese
  • R. S. Wolfe
Original Papers


A new extremely thermophilic methane-producing bacterium was isolated from a submarine hydrothermal vent sample collected by a research team from the Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution using the manned submersible ALVIN. The sample was obtained from the base of a “white smoker” chimney on the East Pacific Rise at 20° 50′ N latitude and 109° 06′ W longitude at a depth of 2600 m. The isolate was a motile irregular coccus with an osmotically fragile cell wall and a complex flagellar system. In defined medium with 80% H2 and 20% CO2, the isolate had a doubling time of 26 min at 85° C. The pH range for growth was 5.2 to 7.0 with an optimum near 6.0. NaCl was required for growth with an optimum of 2 to 3% (w/v). The mol % G+C was 31%. In cell-free extracts, methane formation from methylcoenzyme M was temperature-dependent, and H2 or formate served as electron donors. Methane formation from H2 and CO2 occurred at a much lower rate. Oligonucleotide cataloging of the 16S ribosomal RNA established the isolate as a new species of the genus Methanococcus and the name Methanococcus jannaschii is proposed. The isolation of M. jannaschii from a submarine hydrothermal vent provides additional evidence for biogenic production of CH4 from these deep-sea environments.

Key words

Methanococcus jannaschii Thermophilic methanogenic bacteria Methanococcus Hydrothermal vent methanogen Deep sea methanogen 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Balch WE, Wolfe RS (1976) New approach to the cultivation of methanogenic bacteria: 2-mercaptoethane-sulfonic acid (HS-CoM)-dependent growth of Methanobacterium ruminatium in a pressurized atmosphere. Appl Environ Microbiol 32:781–791Google Scholar
  2. Balch WE, Fox GE, Magrum LJ, Woese CR, Wolfe RS (1979) Methanogens: reevaluation of a unique biological group. Microbiol Revs 43:260–296Google Scholar
  3. Barker HA (1936) Studies on methane producing bacteria. Arch Mikrobiol 7:420–438Google Scholar
  4. Baross JA, Lilley MD, Gordon LI (1982) Is the CH4, H2 and CO venting from submarine hydrothermal systems produced by thermophilic bacteria? Nature 298:366–368Google Scholar
  5. Cavanaugh CM, Gardiner SL, Jones ML, Jannasch HW, Waterbury JB (1981) Procaryotic cells in the hydrothermal vent tube worm Riftia pachyptila Jones: Possible chemoautotrophic symbionts. Science 213:340–342Google Scholar
  6. Corder RE, Hook LA, Larkin JM, Frea JI (1983) Isolation and characterization of two new methane-producing cocci: Methanogenium olentangyi, sp.nov., and Methanococcus deltae, sp. nov. Arch Microbiol. 134:28–32Google Scholar
  7. Corliss JB, Dymond J, Gordon LI, Edmond JM, Herzen RP von, Ballard RD, Green K, Williams D, Bainbridge A, Crane K, van Andel TH (1979) Submarine thermal springs on the Galapagos Rift. Science 203:1073–1083Google Scholar
  8. Fox GE, Pechman KJ, Woese CR (1977) Comparative cataloging of 16S ribosomal ribonucleic acid: molecular approach to procaryotic systematics. Int J Syst Bacteriol 27:44–57Google Scholar
  9. Gold T, Soter S (1980) The deep earth gas hypothesis. Sci Amer 242:154–161Google Scholar
  10. Gunsalus RP, Wolfe RS (1977) Stimulation of CO2 reduction to methane by methyl-coenzyme M in extracts of Methanobacterium. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 76:790–795Google Scholar
  11. Huber J, Thomm M, Konig H, Thies G, Stetter KO (1982) Methanococcus thermolithotrophicus, a novel thermophilic lithotrophic methanogen. Arch Microbiol 132:47–50Google Scholar
  12. Jannasch HW, Wirsen CO (1979) Chemosynthetic primary production at East Pacific sea floor spreading centers. BioScience 29:592–598Google Scholar
  13. Jannasch HW, Wirsen CO (1981) Morphological survey of microbial mats near deep-sea thermal vents. Appl Environ Microbiol 41:528–538Google Scholar
  14. Jones WJ, Paynter MJB, Gupta R (1983) Characterization of Methanococcus maripaludis sp. nov., a new methanogen isolated from salt marsh sediment. Arch Microbiol 135:91–97Google Scholar
  15. Karl DM, Wirsen CO (1980) Deep sea primary production at the Galapagos hydrothermal vents. Science 207:1345–1347Google Scholar
  16. Lilley MD, de Angelis MA, Gordon LI (1982) CH4, H2, CO, and N2 in submarine hydrothermal vent waters. Nature 300:48–50Google Scholar
  17. Nagle DP Jr, Wolfe RS (1983) Component A of the methylcoenzyme M methylreductase system of Methanobacterium: resolution into four components. Proc Nat Acad Sci USA 80:2151–2155Google Scholar
  18. Romesser JA, Balch WE (1980) Coenzyme M: preparation and assay, p. 545–552. In: McCormick DB, Wright LD (ed), Methods in enzymology, vol 67. Academic Press Inc. New YorkGoogle Scholar
  19. Romesser JA, Wolfe RS, Mayer F, Spiess E, Walther-Mauruschat A (1979) Methanogenium, a new Genus of marine methanogenic bacteria, and characterization of Methanogenium cariaci sp. nov. and Methanogenium marisnigri sp. nov. Arch Microbiol 121:147–153Google Scholar
  20. Ruby EG, Wirsen CO, Jannasch HW (1981) Chemolithotrophic sulfur-oxidizing bacteria from the Galapagos Rift hydrothermal vents. Appl Environ Microbiol 42:317–324Google Scholar
  21. Saito H, Miura K (1963) Preparation of transforming deoxyribonucleic acid by phenol treatment. Biochim Biophys Acta 72:619–629Google Scholar
  22. Sanger F, Brownlee GG, Barrell BG (1965) A two-dimensional fractionation procedure for radioactive nucleotides. J Mol Biol 13:373–398Google Scholar
  23. Schauer NL, Ferry JG (1982) Properties of formate dehydrogenase in Methanobacterium formicicum. J Bacteriol 150:1–7Google Scholar
  24. Schildkraut CL, Marmur J, Doty P (1962) Determination of the base composition of deoxyribonucleic acid from its buoyant density in CsCl. J Mol Biol 4:430–443Google Scholar
  25. Spiess FN, Macdonald KC, Atwater T, Ballard R, Carranza A, Cardoba D, Cox C, Diaz Garcia VM, Francheteau J, Guerrero J, Hawkins J, Haymon R, Hessler R, Jutea T, Kastner M, Larson R, Luyendyk B, Macdougall JD, Miller S, Normark W, Orcutt J, Rangin C (1980) East Pacific Rise: Hot springs and geophysical experiments. Science 207:1421–1433Google Scholar
  26. Stadtman TC, Barker HA (1951) Studies on the methane fermentation. X. A new formate-decomposing bacterium, Methanococcus vannielii. J Bacteriol 62:269–280Google Scholar
  27. Uchida T, Bonen L, Schaup HW, Lewis BJ, Zablen L, Woese CR (1974) The use of ribonuclease U2 in RNA sequence determination: some corrections in the catalog of oligomers produced by ribonuclease T1 digestion of Escherichia coli 16S ribosomal RNA. J Mol Evol 3:63–77Google Scholar
  28. Valentine RC, Shapiro BM, Stadtman ER (1968) Regulation of glutamine synthetase. XII. Electron microscopy of the enzyme from Escherichia coli. Biochemistry 7:2143–2152Google Scholar
  29. Williams PM, Smith KL, Druffel EM, Linick TW (1981) Dietary carbon sources of mussels and tubeworms from Galapagos hydrothermal vents determined from tissue 14C activity. Nature 292:448–449Google Scholar
  30. Woese CR, Sogin M, Stahl D, Lewis BJ, Bonen L (1976) A comparison of the 16S ribosomal RNAs from mesophilic and thermophilic Bacilli: some modifications in the Sanger method for RNA sequencing. J Mol Evol 7:197–213Google Scholar
  31. Wolin EA, Wolin MJ, Wolfe RS (1963) Formation of methane by bacterial extracts. J Biol Chem 238:2882–2886Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1983

Authors and Affiliations

  • W. J. Jones
    • 1
  • J. A. Leigh
    • 1
  • F. Mayer
    • 2
  • C. R. Woese
    • 3
  • R. S. Wolfe
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of MicrobiologyUniversity of IllinoisUrbanaUSA
  2. 2.Institut für Mikrobiologie der Universität GöttingenGöttingenGermany
  3. 3.Department of Genetics and DevelopmentUniversity of IllinoisUrbanaUSA

Personalised recommendations