Advertisement

Molecular and General Genetics MGG

, Volume 186, Issue 1, pp 118–121 | Cite as

Restriction and modification in Bacillus subtilis 168

Regulation of hsrM (nonB) expression in spoOA mutants and effects on permissiveness for ϕ15 and ϕ105 phages
  • Vladimir Fučík
  • Helena Grünnerová
  • Stanislav Zadražil
Article

Summary

Gene hsrM (nonB) of Bacillus subtilis 168, causing non-permissiveness to phage SP10 (Saito et al. 1979) and reduced plating efficiency of unmodified phage ϕ105, is responsible for non-permissiveness of B. subtilis 168 for phages π15 and PZA. Upon transformation to sporulation deficiency (allele spoOA) B. subtilis 168 becomes permissive for ϕ15 and PZA and loses the ability to restrict ϕ105. spoOA str-1 double transformants of B. subtilis 168, however, retain the restriction 168 and non-permissiveness for ϕ15 and PZA phages, in spite of their Spo phenotype. Therefore it appears that a functional product of the spoOA gene is required for expression of gene hsrM in wild-type bacteria, but is not essential in streptomycin-resistant bacteria. Phage genomes (PZA) were trapped in spores of the restriction deficient strain with much higher efficiency than in the wild-type.

Keywords

Bacillus Bacillus Subtilis Phage Genome Functional Product Deficient Strain 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Anagnostopoulos C, Spizizen J (1961) Requirements for transformation in Bacillus subtilis. J Bacteriol 81:741–746Google Scholar
  2. Fučík V, Grunow R, Grünnerová H, Hostomský Z and Zadražil S (1980) New members of Bacillus subtilis phage group containing a protein link in their circular DNA. In: Zadražil S, Šponar J (eds) DNA: Recombination, interactions and repair. Pergamon Press, New York, p 111–118Google Scholar
  3. Goldthwaite C, Dubnau D, Smith I (1970) Genetic mapping of antibiotic resistance markers in Bacillus subtilis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 65:96–103Google Scholar
  4. Gryczan TJ, Contente S, Dubnau D (1978) Characterization of Staphylococcus aureus plasmids introduced by transformation into Bacillus subtilis. J Bacteriol 134:318–327Google Scholar
  5. Gwinn DD, Lawton WD (1968) Alteration of host specificity in Bacillus subtilis. Bacteriol Rev 297–301Google Scholar
  6. Hirokawa H (1972) Transfecting deoxyribonucleic acid of Bacillus bacteriophage ϕ29 that is protease sensitive. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 69:1555–1559Google Scholar
  7. Ito J, Meinke W, Hathaway G, Spizizen J (1973) Studies on Bacillus subtilis bacteriophage ϕ15. Virology 56:110–122Google Scholar
  8. Ito J, Spizizen J (1971) Abortive infection of sporulating Bacillus subtilis 168 by ϕ2 bacteriophage. J Virol 7:515–523Google Scholar
  9. Leighton TJ (1974) Sporulation-specific translational discrimination in Bacillus subtilis. J Mol Biol 86:855–863Google Scholar
  10. Marmur J (1961) A procedure for the isolation of deoxyribonucleic acid from microorganisms. J Mol Biol 3:208–218Google Scholar
  11. Moreno F (1979) On the trapping of phage genomes in spores of Bacillus subtilis 168. Reciprocal exclusion of phages ϕ29 and ϕe during outgrowth of spores. Virology 93:357–368Google Scholar
  12. Moreno F, Camacho A, Viñuela E, Salas M (1974) Suppressorsensitive mutants and genetic map of Bacillus subtilis bacteriophage ϕ29. Virology 62:1–16Google Scholar
  13. Reilly BE (1965) A study of the bacteriophages of Bacillus subtilis and their infectious nucleic acids. PhD Dissertation, Department of Microbiology, Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OhioGoogle Scholar
  14. Saito H, Shibata T, Ando T (1979) Mapping of genes determining non-permessiveness and host-specific restriction to bacteriophages in Bacillus subtilis Marburg. Mol Gen Genet 170:117–122Google Scholar
  15. Shibata T, Ando T (1974) Host controlled modification and restriction in Bacillus subtilis. Mol Gen Genet 131:275–280Google Scholar
  16. Shibata T, Ikawa S, Kim C, Ando T (1976) Site-specific deoxyribonucleases in Bacillus subtilis and other Bacillus strains. J Bacteriol 128:473–476Google Scholar
  17. Smith I, Goldthwaite G, Dubnau D (1969) The genetics of ribosomes of Bacillus subtilis. Cold Spring Harbor Symp Quant Biol 34:85–89Google Scholar
  18. Takahashi H, Ikeda Y (1968) A simple method for obtaining multiple marked strains of Bacillus subtilis. J Gen Appl Microbiol (Tokyo) 14:451–452Google Scholar
  19. Trowsdale J, Shiflett M, Hoch JA (1978) New cluster of ribosomal genes in Bacillus subtilis with regulatory role in sporulation. Nature 272:179–181Google Scholar
  20. Uozumi T, Hoshino T, Miwa K, Horinouchi S, Beppu T, Arima K (1977) Restriction and modification in Bacillus species. Genetic transformation of bacteria with DNA from different species, Part I. Mol Gen Genet 152:65–69Google Scholar
  21. Witmer H, Franks M (1981) Restriction and modification of bacteriophage SP 10 DNA by Bacillus subtilis Marburg 168: Stabilization of SP 10 DNA in restricting hosts preinfected with a heterologous phage, SP 18. J Virol 37:148–155Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1982

Authors and Affiliations

  • Vladimir Fučík
    • 1
  • Helena Grünnerová
    • 1
  • Stanislav Zadražil
    • 1
  1. 1.Insititute of Molecular GeneticsCzechoslovak Academy of SciencesPragueCzechoslovakia

Personalised recommendations