Effect of air resistance on the metabolic cost and performance of cycling

  • C. T. M. Davies
Article

Summary

The metabolic cost (VO2) of cycling against a range of wind velocities (VW) was studied in a wind tunnel of 15 male cyclists and the results compared with work on a stationary cycle ergometer, uphill cycling on a treadmill, and performance times in road racing competitions.

The results showed that VO2 at constant treadmill speed was proportional to VW2and was a linear function of work rate, both on the stationary ergometer and during uphill cycling on a motor driven treadmill. Maximal values of 5.04 1×min−1 (69.3 ml×kg−1×min−1) and 482 W were observed. The mean force (F) acting on the cyclists during the experiments in the wind tunnel was found to be equal to 0.0175 VW2×ms−1 (r=+0.98). The mean projected area (AP), drag areas (AD) and drag coefficient (CD) for the 15 cyclists were 0.50 m2, 0.280 m2, and 0.56 m2, respectively. During cycling out of doors on a calm day VO2 was calculated to be a curvilinear function of the cyclists' speed of progression (V). The best guide to the cyclists' maximal aerobic power output (VO2 max) was given by their 16.1 km (10 mile) time:
$$\dot VO_{2\max } (1 \times \min ^{ - 1} ) = - 4.219 + 0.7727{\text{ }}V(ms^{ - 1} )r = + 0.89.$$

The results suggested that the relative aerobic power output (% VO2 max) which could be sustained for a given time by elite cyclists, is similar to that found previously for marathon athletes. However, due to the differences in the non-drag component of the work for given metabolic cost the cyclist will travel approx. 2 1/2 times the distance of an endurance athlete.

Key words

Cycling Wind resistance Aerobic performance Treadmill exercise Projected area 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Adams WC (1967) Influence of age, sex and body weight on the energy expenditure of bicycle riding. J Appl Physiol 22: 539–545Google Scholar
  2. Chandler NR, Chandler CH (1910) Tractive resistance to cycling. Cycling, p 132Google Scholar
  3. Davies CTM (1968) Limitations to the prediction of maximum oxygen intake from cardiac frequency measurements. J Appl Physiol 24: 700–706Google Scholar
  4. Davies CTM, Thompson MW (1979) Aerobic performance of female marathon and male ultramarathon athletes. Eur J Appl Physiol 41: 233–245Google Scholar
  5. Dill DB, Seed JC, Marzulli FN (1954) Energy expenditure in bicycle riding. J Appl Physiol 1: 320–324Google Scholar
  6. Edholm OG, Fletcher JG, Widdowson EM, McCance RA (1955) The energy expenditure and food intake of individual men. Br J Nutr 9: 286–300Google Scholar
  7. McKiken DF, Daniels JT (1976) Aerobic requirements and maximum aerobic power in treadmill and track running. Med Sci 8: 14–17Google Scholar
  8. Nonweiler T (1956) Air resistance of racing cyclists. Cranfield College of Aeronautics Report 106: 1–9Google Scholar
  9. Prampero PE di, Cortili G, Mognoni P, Saibene F (1979) Equation of motion of a cyclist. J Appl Physiol 47: 201–206Google Scholar
  10. Pugh LGCE (1970) Oxygen intake in track and treadmill running with observations on the effect of air resistance. J Physiol 207: 823–835Google Scholar
  11. Pugh LGCE (1974) The relation of oxygen intake and speed in competition cycling and comparative observations on the bicycle ergometer. J Physiol 241: 795–808Google Scholar
  12. Whitt FR (1971) A note on the estimation of the energy expenditure of sporting cyclists. Ergonomics 14: 419–424Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1980

Authors and Affiliations

  • C. T. M. Davies
    • 1
  1. 1.MRC Environmental Physiology UnitLondon School of Hygiene and Tropical MedicineLondonEngland
  2. 2.Department of Physiology and PharmacologyMedical School, Queen's Medical CentreNottinghamEngland

Personalised recommendations