The modified Mayo procedure combined with basal valgus osteotomy of the first metatarsal for severe hallux valgus
- 58 Downloads
- 2 Citations
Summary
The modified Mayo procedure corrects valgus deformity of the great toe secondary to osteoarthritis in the first metatarsophalangeal joint. Basal osteotomy of the first metatarsal to correct metatarsus primus varus and to maintain correction of the valgus deformity may be performed simultaneously. We retrospectively reviewed the results in 55 of 70 feet treated by this combined procedure. The average duration of follow-up was 4.2 years (range 0.5–6 years) and the average age at operation was 63 years (range 45–80 years). The results were either very good or good in 82%, moderate in 14%, and poor in 4%. Our technique of basal osteotomy of the first metatarsal is a simple and effective procedure to correct metatarsus primus varus and may restore the distal transverse arch. It should be considered as a possible method of treatment when the intermetatarsal angle is greater than 10°.
Keywords
Public Health Osteoarthritis Average Duration Effective Procedure Hallux ValgusPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
- 1.Brandes M (1929) Zur operativen Therapie des Hallus valgus. Zentralbl Chir 56:2434–2440Google Scholar
- 2.Chapchal G (1970) Erfahrungen mit der Operation nach Mayo. “Der Vorfuß”. Huber, pp 79–83Google Scholar
- 3.Coughin MJ, Mann RA (1987) Arthrodesis of the first metatarsophalangeal joint as salvage for the failed Keller procedure. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 69:68–74Google Scholar
- 4.Grace D, Hughes J, Klenermann L (1988) A comparison of Wilsin and Hohmann osteotomies in the treatment of hallux valgus. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 70:236–241Google Scholar
- 5.Groulier P, Curvale G, Prudent HP, Vedel F (1988) Résultats du traitement de l'hallux valgus selon la technique de McBride, “modifiée” avec ou sans ostéotomie phalangienne ou metatarsienne complémentaire. Rev Chir Orthop 74:539–548Google Scholar
- 6.Henry APJ, Waugh W (1975) The use of footprints in assessing the results of operations for halux valgus. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 57:478–481Google Scholar
- 7.Keller WL (1904) The surgical treatment of bunions and hallux valgus. NY Med J 80:741–742Google Scholar
- 8.Lelievre J (1967) Lesions statiques du pied. Rev Prat 17:1054–1063Google Scholar
- 9.Lelievre J (1967) Pathologie du pied. Masson, ParisGoogle Scholar
- 10.Mayo CL (1908) The surgical treatment of bunions. Ann Surg 48:300–302Google Scholar
- 11.Mestdagh H, Tillie B, D'Hondt D (1986) Résultats à long terme de l'intervention de Keller dans le traitement de l'hallux valgus. Ann Chir 40:267–273Google Scholar
- 12.Reverdin J (1881) Anatomic et opération de l'hallux valgus. Meeting of the Geneva Medical Society 4 May 1881Google Scholar
- 13.Turnbull T, Grange W (1986) A comparison of Keller's arthroplasty and distal metatarsal osteotomy in the treatment of adult hallux valgus. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 68:132–137Google Scholar
- 14.Vichard P, Zeil A, Deck D (1990) Techniques et résultats de l'opération de Keller-Brandes-Lelièvre. Rev Chir Orthop [Suppl 1] 76:116Google Scholar
- 15.Viladot A (1982) Überlegungen bezüglich der operativen Behandlung des Hallux valgus und der Hammerzehen. Orthopäde 11:162–169Google Scholar
- 16.Vitek M, Steinböck G (1989) Value of cerclage fibreux for the Keller-Brandes procedure. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 108:104–106Google Scholar
- 17.Wanivenhaus AH, Feldner-Busztin H (1988) Basal osteotomy of the first metatarsal for the correction of metatarsus primus varus associated with hallux valgus. Foot Ankle 8:337–343Google Scholar