Springer Nature is making SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 research free. View research | View latest news | Sign up for updates

A dotted line assimilates in visibility to a solid line

Abstract

This study tested the theory that a context-produced increase in visibility of a target is due to its assimilation in visibility to the context. A context+target and a context are discriminated better than are a target and background. This occurs for two different context+targets in which the context is a solid line and the target is a dotted line. But it does not occur when solid lines replace these dotted lines. The dotted lines are much less visible than the solid lines. Therefore, the dotted lines increase in similarity in visibility to the solid lines, which is assimilation, but for visibility, rather than for a typical part. Assimilation does not occur between perceptually equal parts. Consequently, the reason why the two context+targets with only solid lines do not result in increases in visibility may be that these lines are sufficiently equal in visibility that assimilation in visibility is precluded. So, the theory is supported. This theory is consistent with evidence that one group (phenomenal whole) is associated with both assimilation and an increase in visibility. Accordingly, a stimulus with a relatively large distance between its solid and dotted lines is apprehended as a relatively weak group, and does not result in an increase in visibility.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Alpern, M. (1953). Metacontrast. Journal of the Optical Society of America, 43, 648–657.

  2. Appelle, S. (1972). Perception and discrimination as a function of stimulus orientation: the “oblique effect” in man and animals. Psychological Bulletin, 78, 266–278.

  3. Beck, J. (1966). Contrast and assimilation in lightness judgments. Perception & Psychophysics, 1, 342–344.

  4. Becker, C. A., & Killion, T. H. (1977). Interaction of visual and cognitive effects in word recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 3, 389–401.

  5. Besner, D., & Smith, M. C. (1992). Models of visual word recognition: when obscuring the stimulus yields a clearer view. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 18, 468–482.

  6. Bevan, W., & Gaylord, S. (1978). Stimuli, the perceiver, and perception. In R. D. Walk and H. L. Pick, Jr. (Eds.), Perception and experience (361–385). NY: Plenum.

  7. Borowsky, R., & Besner, D. (1991). Visual word recognition across orthographies: on the interaction between context and degradation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 17, 272–276

  8. Brigell, M., & Uhlarik, J. (1979). The relational determination of length illusions and length aftereffects. Perception, 8, 187–197.

  9. Castiello, U., & Umiltà, C. (1990). Size of the attentional focus and efficiency of processing. Acta Psychologica, 73, 195–209.

  10. Coren, S., & Girgus, J. S. (1978). Seeing is deceiving: The psychology of visual illusions. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

  11. Coren, S., & Girgus, J. S. (1980). Principles of perceptual organization and spatial distortion: The gestalt illusions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 6, 404–412.

  12. Day, R. H., & Jory, M. R. (1980). A note on a second stage in the formation of illusory contours. Perception & Psychophysics, 27, 89–91.

  13. Eriksen, C. W., & Hoffman, J. E. (1972). Temporal and spatial characteristics of selective encoding from visual displays. Perception & Psychophysics, 12, 201–204.

  14. Eriksen, C. W., & St. James, J. D. (1986). Visual attention within and around the field of focal attention: a zoom lens model. Perception & Psychophysics, 40, 225–240.

  15. Fehrer, E., & Smith, E. (1962). Effect of luminance ratio on masking. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 14, 243–253.

  16. Fuchs, W. (1967). The influence of form on the assimilation of colours. In W. D. Ellis (Ed. and trans.), A source book of gestalt psychology (pp. 95–103). New York: Humanities Press (original paper published 1923).

  17. Gaylord, S. (1984). Effects of inter-stimulus distances on the formation of category boundaries. Doctoral dissertation, Duke University, Durham, NC.

  18. Gescheider, G. A. (1985). Psychophysics: method, theory, and application (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

  19. Grier, J. B. (1971). Nonparametric indexes for sensitivity and bias: computing formulas. Psychological Bulletin, 75, 424–429.

  20. Growney, R., Weisstein, N., & Cox, S. I. (1977). Metacontrast as a function of spatial separation with narrow line targets and masks. Vision Research, 17, 1205–1210.

  21. Hawkins, H. L., Shafto, M. G., & Richardson, K. (1988). Effects of target luminance and cue validity on the latency of visual detection. Perception & Psychophysics, 44, 484–492.

  22. Helson, H., & Joy, V. L. (1962). Domains of lightness assimilation and contrast. Psychologische Beitrage, 62, 405–415.

  23. Jordan, K., & Schiano, D. J. (1986). Serial processing and the parallel-lines illusion: length contrast through relative spatial separation of contours. Perception & Psychophysics, 40, 384–390.

  24. Kanizsa, G. (1988). Colour and organisation: a response to King. New Ideas in Psychology, 6, 289–291.

  25. King, D. L. (1988a). Assimilation is due to one perceived whole and contrast is due to two perceived wholes. New Ideas in Psychology, 6, 277–288.

  26. King, D. L. (1988b). Strong phenomenal wholes are associated with fast “same” and slow “different” responses and superior overall performance. Perception & Psychophysics, 43, 485–493.

  27. King, D. L. (1990a). Gestalts are more closely associated with performance on a discrimination task than are component stimuli. American Journal of Psychology, 103, 37–52.

  28. King, D. L. (1990b). A large rectangle delays the perception of a separate small rectangle. Perception & Psychophysics, 47, 369–378.

  29. King, D. L., Hicks, H., & Brown, P. D. (1993). Context-produced increases in visibility. Psychological Research, 55, 10–14.

  30. King, D. L., Mose, J. F., & Nixon, N. (1995a). One line decreases the visibility of a simultaneous identical distant second line. Perception & Psychophysics, 57, 393–401.

  31. King, D. L., Phillips, W., & Mose, J. F. (1995b). The association of assimilation and an increase in visibility in perceptual grouping. Psychological Research, 58, 83–91

  32. King, D. L., & Thomas, J. (1993). Two effects of context on the presence/absence of connecting segments. Perception & Psychophysics, 53, 489–497.

  33. King-Smith, P. E., & Kulikowski, J. J. (1975). Pattern and flicker detection analysed by subthreshold summation. Journal of Physiology, 249, 519–548.

  34. Koffka, K. (1935). Principles of gestalt psychology. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.

  35. Kolers, P. A., & Rosner, B. S. (1960). On visual masking (metacontrast): Dichoptic observation. American Journal of Psychology, 77, 2–21.

  36. Kulikowski, J. J., & King-Smith, P. E. (1973). Spatial arrangement of line, edge, and grating detectors revealed by subthreshold summation. Vision Research, 13, 1455–1478.

  37. Lockhead, G. R. (1988). Assimilation and contrast: two processes or one? A response to King. New Ideas in Psychology, 6, 293–299.

  38. MacKinnon, G. E., Forde, J., & Piggins, D. J. (1969). Stabilized images, steadily fixated figures, and prolonged after-images. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 23, 184–195.

  39. Moore, C. M., & Osman, A. M. (1993). Looking for two targets at the same time: One search or two? Perception & Psychophysics, 53, 381–390.

  40. Musatti, C. (1931). Forma e assimilazione. Archivio Italiano di Psicologia, 9, 213–269.

  41. Obonai, T. (1954). Induction effects on estimates of extent. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 47, 57–60.

  42. Pollack, I., & Norman, D. A. (1964). A non-parametric analysis of recognition experiments. Psychonomic Science, 1, 125–126.

  43. Pollack, R. H. (1964). Simultaneous and successive presentation of elements of the Mueller-Lyer figure and chronological age. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 19, 303–310

  44. Pollatsek, A., & Digman, L. (1977). Dependent spatial channels in visual processing. Cognitive Psychology, 9, 326–352.

  45. Pomerantz, J. R., Sager, L. C., & Stoever, R. J. (1977). Perception of wholes and their component parts: some configural superiority effects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 3, 422–435.

  46. Prinzmetal, W., & Keysar, B. (1989). Functional theory of illusory conjunctions and neon colors. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 118, 165–190.

  47. Pritchard, R. M (1961). Stabilized images on the retina. Scientific American, 204, 72–78.

  48. Purcell, D. G., & Stewart, A. L. (1988). The face-detection effect: configuration enhances detection. Perception & Psychophysics, 43, 355–366.

  49. Rentschler, I., & Fiorentini, A. (1974) Meridional anisotropy of psychophysical spatial interactions. Vision Research, 14, 1467–1473.

  50. Rentschler, I., & Hilz, R. (1976). Evidence for disinhibition in line detectors. Vision Research, 16, 1299–1302.

  51. Sagara, M., & Oyama, T. (1957). Experimental studies on figural aftereffects in Japan. Psychological Bulletin, 54, 327–338.

  52. Schiller, P. H., & Smith, M. C. (1966). Detection in metacontrast. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 71, 32–39.

  53. Snodgrass, J. G., Levy-Berger, G., & Haydon, M. (1985). Human experimental psychology. New York: Oxford University Press.

  54. Strasburger, H., Harvey, L. O., Jr., & Rentschler, I. (1991). Contrast thresholds for identification of numeric characters in direct and eccentric view. Perception & Psychophysics, 49, 495–508.

  55. Treisman, A. M., Kahneman, D., & Burkell, J. (1983). Perceptual objects and the cost of filtering. Perception & Psychophysics, 33, 527–532.

  56. Ware, C. (1980). Coloured illusory triangles due to assimilation. Perception, 9, 103–107.

  57. Weisstein, N., & Harris, C. S. (1974). Visual detection of line segments: an object superiority effect. Science, 186, 752–755.

Download references

Author information

Correspondence to D. L. King.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

King, D.L., Robinson, E.L. & Roberts, T.R. A dotted line assimilates in visibility to a solid line. Psychol. Res 59, 4–15 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00419830

Download citation

Keywords

  • Large Distance
  • Equal Part
  • Typical Part
  • Line Increase
  • Weak Group