Springer Nature is making SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 research free. View research | View latest news | Sign up for updates

The value of a certified quality management system: the perception of internal developers

  • 45 Accesses

  • 4 Citations

Abstract

There is growing interest among internal information technology (IT) departments in implementing a certified quality management system (QMS). This paper examines the forces that have influenced organizations that supply development services to adopt QMS models and explores the relevance of these forces to internal IT developers. The perceptions of internal developers regarding the value of QMS in addressing these forces were studied using a multiple case study involving four organizations. The results suggest that while the reasons given by external developers concern mainly the marketing advantages of adopting a QMS, internal developers envisage the major advantage to be an improvement in the development process.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. 1.

    Forrest, D. Third party certification: a value for money recognition, Quality Australia, 9 (3), (1992) 16.

  2. 2.

    Dromey, R.G. Software Engineering Standards, Australian Software Quality Research Institute-Griffith University Queensland, Technical Report SQI-93-02, May, 1993.

  3. 3.

    Inwood, C. Developers still lagging in ISO preparation, Computing Canada, 19 (17), (1993).

  4. 4.

    Rothery, B. ISO9000, 2nd edn (Gower, UK, 1993).

  5. 5.

    Humphrey, W. Characterizing the software process: a maturity framework, IEEE Software, 5 (2) (1989).

  6. 6.

    Durand, I.G., Marquardt, D.W., Peach, R.W., and Pyle, J.C. Updating the ISO9000 Quality Standards: responding to marketplace needs. Quality Progress, July (1993) 23.

  7. 7.

    Humphrey, W. Managing the Software Process (Addison-Wesley, 1990).

  8. 8.

    SEI Technical Reports SEI-91-TR-24 and SEI-91-TR-25, Carnegie Mellon University, USA, 1991.

  9. 9.

    Dichter, C. Software audits: how good really? UNIX Review, 11 (10) (1993) 42.

  10. 10.

    Francis, R. Quality and process management: a view from the UK computing services industry, Software Quality Journal, 2 Special Edition (1993) 239.

  11. 11.

    Smillie, E. The software quality target, Informatics (Australian Computer Society), July (1993).

  12. 12.

    Bloor, R. CASE history, DBMS UK, February, 7 (2) (1994) 12.

  13. 13.

    Haverson, D.S. Shedding light on ISO9000, MIDRANGE Systems, 6 (15) (1993) 40.

  14. 14.

    Inwood, C. We can't escape the ISO certification push. Computing Canada, 19 (9), (1993) 25.

  15. 15.

    Longman, J. To certify or not to certify: commercial outfits face need for ISO 9000 approval, Computer Reseller News, 530 (1993) 197.

  16. 16.

    Craigmyle, M. and Fletcher, I. Improving IT effectiveness through software process assessment, Software Quality Journal, (1993) 265–275.

  17. 17.

    Lee, J. and Kim, S.-H. The relationship between procedural formulisation in MIS development and MIS success, Information & Management, 22 (1992) 89–111.

  18. 18.

    Yin, R. Case Study Research — Design and Methods (Sage Publications, UK, 1989).

  19. 19.

    Benbasat, I., Goldstein, D. and Mead, M. The case research strategy in studies of information systems, MIS Quarterly, September (1987).

  20. 20.

    Earl, M.J. Management Strategies for Information Technology (Prentice Hall, UK, 1989).

Download references

Author information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Robinson, K., Simmons, P. The value of a certified quality management system: the perception of internal developers. Software Qual J 5, 61–73 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00419770

Download citation

Keywords

  • quality management systems
  • software quality assurance
  • software process improvement
  • certification