Biology and Fertility of Soils

, Volume 17, Issue 1, pp 39–44

Effect of fungal to bacterial biomass ratio on the relationship between CO2 evolution and total soil microbial biomass

  • K. Sakamoto
  • Y. Oba
Original Paper


The relationship between the fungal: bacterial biomass ratio and the metabolic quotient (qCO2) was studied in three different soils. In addition, the effect of the fungal: bacterial biomass ratio on the relationship between CO2 evolution and the size of the soil microbial biomass was examined. Soil samples were collected from three experimental fields amended with various organic materials (Yatsugatake, Ibaraki, and Tochigi fields). The range of the fungal:bacterial biomass ratio in the Yatsugatake and Ibaraki fields was small (1.54–2.24 and 1.11–1.71, respectively), but it was large in the Tochigi field (1.18–3.75). We found a high negative correlation between this ratio and the metabolic quotient (qCO2=2.10−0.361 (fungal:bacterial biomass ratio), R=−0.851, P<0.01) in the Tochigi field. Therefore, we suggest tha qCO2 decreases with an increase in the fungal:bacterial biomass ratio, which may be due to a higher efficiency of substrate C use by fungal flora in comparison with bacterial flora. In the Yatsugatake and Ibaraki fields, there was a high positive correlation between CO2 evolution and total microbial biomass. In contrast, no correlation was observed between these two parameters in the Tochigi field, probably reflecting the wide range of values for the fungal:bacterial biomass ratio. From the results obtained, we suggest that the fungal: bacterial biomass ratio is an important factor regulating the relationship between CO2 evolution and the size of the microbial biomass.

Key words

CO2 evolution Microbial obiomass Fungal bacterial biomass ratio qCO2 Organic manuring 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Alexander M (1977) Introduction to soil microbiology, 2nd edn. Wiley & Sons, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  2. Anderson JPE (1982) Soil respiration. In: Page AL, Miller RM, Keeney DR (eds) Methods of soil analysis, part 2. Chemical and microbiological properties, 2nd edn. Agronomy 9, Am Soc Agron, Madison, Wis, pp 831–871Google Scholar
  3. Anderson TH, Domsch KH (1986) Carbon assimilation and microbial activity in soil. Z Pflanzenernaehr Bodenkd 149:457–468Google Scholar
  4. Campbell R (1983) Microbial ecology, 2nd edn. Basic microbiology, vol 5. Blackwell, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  5. Frankenberger WT Jr, Dick WA (1983) Relationships between enzyme activities and microbial growth and activity indices in soil. Soil Sci Soc Am J 47:945–951Google Scholar
  6. Hanssen JF, Thingstad TF, Goksoyr J (1974) Evaluation of hyphal lengths and fungal biomass in soil by a membrane filter technique. Oikos 25:102–107Google Scholar
  7. Hasebe A, Kanazawa S, Takai Y (1985) Microbial biomass in paddy soil. 2. “Microbial biomass carbon” measured by Jenkinson's fumigation method. Soil Sci Plant Nutr 31:349–359Google Scholar
  8. Hobbie JE, Daley RJ, Jaspar S (1977) Use of nuclepore filter for counting bacteria by fluorescence microscopy. Appl Environ Microbiol 33:1225–1228Google Scholar
  9. Insam H, Domsch KH (1988) Relationship between soil organic carbon and microbial biomass on chronosequences of reclamation sites. Microb Ecol 15:177–188Google Scholar
  10. Insam H, Haselwandter K (1989) Metabolic quotient of the soil microflora in relation to plant succession. Oecologia (Berlin) 79:174–178Google Scholar
  11. Inubushi K, Brookes PC, Jenkinson DS (1989) Influence of paraquat on the extraction of adenosine triphosphate from soil by trichloroacetic acid. Soil Biol Biochem 21:741–742Google Scholar
  12. Jenkinson DS, Oades JM (1979) A method for measuring adenosine triphosphate in soil. Soil Biol Biochem 11:193–199Google Scholar
  13. Kaczmarek W, Kaszubiak H, Pedziwilk Z (1976) The ATP content in soil microorganisms. Ekol Pol 24:399–406Google Scholar
  14. Nannipieri P, Grego S, Ceccanti B (1990) Ecological significance of the biological activity in soil. In: Bollag J, Stotzky G (eds) Soil biochemistry vol 6. Dekker, New York, pp 293–355Google Scholar
  15. Nishio M (1983) Direct-count estimation of microbial biomass in soil applied with compost. Biol Agric Hortil 1:109–125Google Scholar
  16. Oades JM, Jenkinson DS (1979) Adenosine triphosphate content of the soil microbial biomass. Soil Biol Biochem 11:201–204Google Scholar
  17. Odum E (1969) The strategy of ecosystem development. Science 164:262–270Google Scholar
  18. Ross DJ, Tate KR, Cairns A, Pansier EA (1980) Microbial biomass estimations in soils from tussorck grasslands by three biochemical procedures. Soil Biol Biochem 12:375–383Google Scholar
  19. Sakamoto K, Oba Y (1991) Relationship between the amount of organic material applied and soil biomass content. Soil Sci Plant Nutr 37:387–397Google Scholar
  20. Šantrůcčková H, Straškraba M (1991) On the relationship between specific respiration activity and microbial biomass in soils. Soil Biol Biochem 23:525–532Google Scholar
  21. Seto M (1980) Rate of CO2 evolution from soil in relation to content of soil water and amount of dissolved organic carbon in soil solution. Jpn J Ecol 30:385–391 (in Japanese with English summary)Google Scholar
  22. Shields JA, Paul EA, Lowe WE (1973) Turnover of microbial tissue in soil under field conditions. Soil Biol Biochem 5:753–764Google Scholar
  23. Sparling GP (1981) Microcalorimetry and other methods to assess biomass and activity in soil. Soil Biol Biochem 13:93–98Google Scholar
  24. Yanagida T (1984) Microbial science, vol 4. Ecology Business Center for Academic Societies Japan, Tokyo (in Japanese)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1994

Authors and Affiliations

  • K. Sakamoto
    • 1
  • Y. Oba
    • 2
  1. 1.Faculty of HorticultureUniversity of ChibaMatsudoJapan
  2. 2.Institute of Applied BiochemistryUniversity of TsukubaTsukubaJapan

Personalised recommendations