Advertisement

Theoretical and Computational Fluid Dynamics

, Volume 4, Issue 2, pp 79–93 | Cite as

Reactant conversion in homogeneous turbulence: Mathematical modeling, computational validations, and practical applications

  • C. K. Madnia
  • S. H. Frankel
  • P. Givi
Article

Abstract

Closed form analytical expressions are obtained for predicting the limiting rate of mean reactant conversion in homogeneous turbulent flows under the influence of a binary reaction of the type F+rO→(1+r) Product. These relations are obtained by means of a single-point Probability Density Function (PDF) method based on the Amplitude Mapping Closure (Kraichnan, 1989; Chen et al., 1989; Pope, 1991). It is demonstrated that with this model, the maximum rate of the mean reactants' decay can be conveniently expressed in terms of definite integrals of the parabolic cylinder functions. For the cases with complete initial segregation, it is shown that the results agree very closely with those predicted by employing a beta density of the first kind for an appropriately defined Shvab-Zeldovich scalar variable. With this assumption, the final results can also be expressed in terms of closed form analytical expressions which are based on the incomplete beta functions. With both models, the dependence of the results on the stoichiometric coefficient and the equivalence ratio can be expressed in an explicit manner. For a stoichiometric mixture the analytical results simplify significantly. In the mapping closure these results are expressed in terms of simple trigonometric functions. For the beta density model they are in the form of gamma functions. In all the cases considered, the results are shown to agree well with data generated by Direct Numerical Simulations (DNS). Due to the simplicity of these expressions and because of nice mathematical features of the parabolic cylinder and the incomplete beta functions, these models are recommended for estimating the limiting rate of mean reactant conversion in homogeneous reacting flows. These results also provide a valuable tool in assessing the extent of validity of turbulence closures for the modeling of unpremixed reacting flows. Some discussions are provided on the extension of the models for teating more complicated reacting systems, including realistic kinetics schemes and multiscalar mixing with finite rate chemical reactions in more complex configurations.

Keywords

Probability Density Function Direct Numerical Simulation Equivalence Ratio Reactant Conversion Mapping Closure 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Abramowitz, M., and Stegun, I.A. (1972). Handbook of Mathematical Functions and Formulas, Graphs, and Mathematical Tables. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  2. Bilger, R.W. (1980). Turbulent flows with nonpremixed reactants. In Libby, P.A., and Williams, F.A., editors, Turbulent Reacting Flows, pp. 65–113. Springer-Verlag, Heidelberg.Google Scholar
  3. Brodkey, R.S. (1981). Fundamentals of turbulent motion. Chem. Engrg. Comm. 8, 1–23.Google Scholar
  4. Chen, H., Chen, S., and Kraichnan, R.H. (1989). Probability distribution of a stochastically advected scalar field. Phys. Rev. Lett. 63, 2657–2660.Google Scholar
  5. Curl, R.L. (1963). Dispersed phase mixing: I. Theory and effects in simple reactors. AIChE J. 9, 175–181.Google Scholar
  6. Dutta, A., and Tarbell, J.M. (1989). Closure models for turbulent reacting flows. AIChE J. 35, 2013–2027.Google Scholar
  7. Erlebacher, G., Hussaini, M.Y., Speziale, C.G., and Zang, T.A. (1987). Toward the large eddy simulation of compressible turbulent flows. ICASE Report 87-20, NASA Langley Research Center, Hampton, VA. Also available as NASA CR 178273.Google Scholar
  8. Erlebacher, G., Hussaini, M.Y., Speziale, C.G., and Zang, T.A. (1990a). On the large-eddy simulation of compressible isotropic turbulence. In Proc. 12th Internat. Conf. on Numerical Methods in Fluid Dynamics.Google Scholar
  9. Erlebacher, G., Hussaini, M.Y., Kreiss, H.O., and Sarkar, S. (1990b). The analysis and simulation of compressible turbulence. Theoret. Comput. Fluid Dynamics 2, 73–95.Google Scholar
  10. Eswaran, V., and Pope, S.B. (1988). Direct numerical simulations of the turbulent mixing of a passive scalar. Phys. Fluids 31, 506–520.Google Scholar
  11. Frankel, S.H. (1992). Ph.D. Thesis, Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, State University of New York at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY, in preparation.Google Scholar
  12. Frankel, S.H., Madnia, C.K., and Givi, P. (1991). On the modeling of the unmixedness in homogeneous reacting turbulence. Chem. Engrg. Comm. 104, 117–125.Google Scholar
  13. Frankel, S.H., Jiang, T.J., and Givi, P. (1992a). Modeling of isotropic reacting turbulence by a hybrid mapping-EDQNM closure. AIChE J. 38, 535–543.Google Scholar
  14. Frankel, S.H., Madnia, C.K., and Givi, P. (1992b). Modeling of the reactant conversion rate in a turbulent shear flow. Chem. Engrg. Comm. 113, 197–209.Google Scholar
  15. Gao, F. (1991a). An analytical solution for the scalar probability density function in homogeneous turbulence. Phys. Fluids A 3, 511–513.Google Scholar
  16. Gao, F. (1991b). Mapping closure and non-Gaussianity of the scalar probability density functions in isotropic turbulence. Phys. Fluids A 3, 2438–2444.Google Scholar
  17. Gao, F., and O'Brien, E.E. (1991). A mapping closure for multispecies Fickian diffusion. Phys. Fluids A 3, 956–959.Google Scholar
  18. Girimaji, S.S. (1991a). Assumed β-pdf model for turbulent mixing: validation and extension to multiple scalar mixing. Combust. Sci. Technol. 78, 177–196.Google Scholar
  19. Girimaji, S.S. (1991b). A simple recipe for modeling reaction-rates in flows with turbulent-combustion. AIAA paper AIAA-91-1792.Google Scholar
  20. Givi, P. (1989). Model free simulations of turbulent reactive flows. Progr. Energy Combust. Sci. 15, 1–107.Google Scholar
  21. Givi, P., and McMurtry, P.A. (1988). Non-premixed reaction in homogeneous turbulence: direct numerical simulations. AIChE J. 34, 1039–1042.Google Scholar
  22. Hawthorne, W.R., Wedell, D.S., and Hottel, H.C. (1949). Mixing and combustion in turbulent gas jets. In Proc. 3rd Symp. on Combustion, Flames and Explosion Phenomena, pp. 266–288. The Combustion Institute, Pittsburgh, PA.Google Scholar
  23. Hill, J.C. (1976). Homogeneous turbulent mixing with chemical reaction. Ann. Rev. Fluid Mech. 8, 135–161.Google Scholar
  24. Hussaini, M.Y., Speziale, C.G., and Zang, T.A. (1990). The potential and limitations of direct and large eddy simulations. In Lumley, J.L., editor, Whither Turbulence? Turbulence at the Crossroads, pp. 354–368. Lecture Notes in Physics, vol. 357. Springer-Verlag, Berlin.Google Scholar
  25. Janicka, J., and Peters, N. (1982). Prediction of turbulent jet diffusion flame lift-off using a pdf transport equation. In Proc. 19th Internat. Symp. on Combustion, pp. 367–374. The Combustion Institute, Pittsburgh, PA.Google Scholar
  26. Janicka, J., Kolbe, W., and Kollmann, W. (1979). Closure of the transport equation for the probability density function of turbulent scalar field. J. Nonequil. Thermodyn. 4, 47–66.Google Scholar
  27. Jiang, T.-L., Givi, P., and Gao, F. (1992). Binary and trinary scalar mixing by Fickian diffusion-some mapping closure results. Phys. Fluids A 4, 1028–1035.Google Scholar
  28. Johnson, M.E. (1987). Multivariate Statistical Simulation. Wiley, New York.Google Scholar
  29. Johnson, N.L., and Kotz, S. (1972). Distributions in Statistics: Continuous Multivariate Distributions. Wiley, New York.Google Scholar
  30. Jones, W.P., and Priddin, C.H. (1978). Predictions of the flowfield and local gas composition in gas turbine combustors. In Proc. 17th Internat. Symp. on Combustion, pp. 399–409. The Combustion Institute, Pittsburgh, PA.Google Scholar
  31. Kollmann, W. (1990). The pdf approach to turbulent flow. Theoret. Comput. Fluid Dynamics 1, 249–285.Google Scholar
  32. Kosaly, G. (1986). Theoretical remarks on a phenomenological model of turbulent mixing. Combust. Sci. Technol. 49, 227–234.Google Scholar
  33. Kosaly, G. (1987). Non-premixed simple reaction in homogeneous turbulence. AIChE J. 33, 1998–2002.Google Scholar
  34. Kosaly, G., and Givi, P. (1987). Modeling of turbulent molecular mixing. Combust. Flame 70, 101–118.Google Scholar
  35. Kraichnan, R.H. (1989). Closures for probability distributions. Bull. Amer. Phys. Soc. 34, 2298.Google Scholar
  36. Leonard, A.D., and Hill, J.C. (1987). A simple chemical reaction in numerically simulated homogeneous turbulence. AIAA paper AIAA-87-0134.Google Scholar
  37. Leonard, A.D., and Hill, J.C. (1988a). Direct numerical simulation of a homogeneous turbulent reacting flow. AIAA paper AIAA-88-3624.Google Scholar
  38. Leonard, A.D., and Hill, J.C. (1988b). Direct numerical simulation of turbulent flows with chemical reaction. J. Sci. Comput. 3, 25–43.Google Scholar
  39. Leonard, A.D., and Hill, J.C. (1991). Scalar dissipation and mixing in turbulent reacting flows. Phys. Fluids A. 3, 1286–1299.Google Scholar
  40. Libby, P.A., and Williams, F.A., editors (1980). Turbulent Reacting Flows. Topics in Applied Physics, vol. 44. Springer-Verlag, Heidelberg.Google Scholar
  41. Lockwood, F.C., and Moneib, H.A. (1980). Fluctuating temperature measurement in a heated round free jet. Combust. Sci. Technol. 22, 63–81.Google Scholar
  42. Madnia, C.K., and Givi, P. (1992). On DNS and LES of homogeneous reacting turbulence. In Galperin, B., and Orszag, S.A., editors, Large Eddy Simulations of Complex Engineering and Geophysical Flows. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, in press.Google Scholar
  43. Madnia, C.K., Frankel, S.H., and Givi, P. (1991a). Direct numerical simulations of the unmixedness in homogeneous reacting turbulence. Chem. Engrg. Comm. 109, 19–29.Google Scholar
  44. Madnia, C.K., Frankel, S.H., and Givi, P. (1991b). Mathematical modeling of the reactant conversion rate by single-point pdf methods. In Proc. Fall Technical Meeting of the Combustion Institute, Eastern Section, Ithaca, NY.Google Scholar
  45. McMurtry, P.A., and Givi, P. (1989). Direct numerical simulations of mixing and reaction in a nonpremixed homogeneous turbulent flow. Combust. Flame 77, 171–185.Google Scholar
  46. Narumi, S. (1923). On the general form of bivariate frequency distributions which are mathematically possible when regression and variation are subjected to limiting conditions, I. Biometrika 15, 77–88.Google Scholar
  47. O'Brien, E.E. (1971). Turbulent mixing of two rapidly reacting chemical species. Phys. Fluids 14, 1326.Google Scholar
  48. O'Brien, E.E. (1980). The probability density function (PDF) approach to reacting turbulent flows. In Libby, P.A., and Williams, F.A., editors, Turbulent Reacting Flows, pp. 185–218. Springer-Verlag, Heidelberg.Google Scholar
  49. Passot, T., and Pouquet, A. (1987). Numerical simulation of compressible homogeneous flows in the turbulent regime. J. Fluid Mech. 181, 441–466.Google Scholar
  50. Pearson, K. (1895). Contributions to the mathematical theory of evolution: II. Skew variations in homogeneous material. Philos. Trans. Roy. Soc. London Ser. A. 186, 343–414.Google Scholar
  51. Peters, N. (1984). Laminar diffusion flamelet models in non-premixed turbulent combustion. Progr. Energy Combust. Sci. 10, 319–339.Google Scholar
  52. Pope, S.B. (1976). The probability approach to modelling of turbulent reacting flows. Combust. Flame 27, 299–312.Google Scholar
  53. Pope, S.B. (1981). A Monte Carlo method for the pdf equations of turbulent reactive flow. Combust. Sci. Techol. 25, 159–174.Google Scholar
  54. Pope, S.B. (1982). An improved turbulent mixing model. Combust. Sci. Technol. 28, 131–145.Google Scholar
  55. Pope, S.B. (1985). PDF methods for turbulent reacting flows. Progr. Energy Combust. Sci. 11, 119–192.Google Scholar
  56. Pope, S.B. (1990). Computations of turbulent combustion: progress and challenges. In Proc. 23rd Internat. Symp. on Combustion, pp. 591–612. The Combustion Institute, Pittsburgh, PA.Google Scholar
  57. Pope, S.B. (1991). Mapping closures for turbulent mixing and reaction. Theoret. Comput. Fluid Dynamics 2, 255–270.Google Scholar
  58. Priddin, C.H. (1991). Turbulent combustion modelling—a review. In Johansson, A.V., and Alfredsson, P.H., editors, Advances in Turbulence 3, pp. 279–299. Springer-Verlag, Berlin.Google Scholar
  59. Rhodes, P.R. (1975). A probability distribution function for turbulent flows. In Murthy, S.N.B., editor, Turbulent Mixing in Non-Reactive and Reactive Mixing, pp. 235–241. Plenum, New York.Google Scholar
  60. Toor, H.L. (1962). Mass transfer in dilute turbulent and nonturbulent systems with rapid irreversible reactions and equal diffusivities. AIChE J. 8, 70–78.Google Scholar
  61. Toor, H.L. (1975). The non-premixed reaction: A + B → Products. In Brodkey, R.S., editor, Turbulence in Mixing Operations, pp. 123–166. Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
  62. Valiño, L., and Gao, F. (1991). Monte Carlo implementation of the mapping closure for turbulent reacting flows. In Fluid Dynamics Division Meeting of the American Physical Society, Phoenix, AZ.Google Scholar
  63. Valiño, L., Ros, J., and Dopazo, C. (1991). Monte Carlo implementation and analytic solution of an inert-scalar turbulent-mixing test problem using a mapping closure. Phys. Fluids A 3, 2191–2198.Google Scholar
  64. Wilks, S.S. (1962). Mathematical Statistics, 2nd edn. Wiley, New York.Google Scholar
  65. Williams, F.A. (1985). Combustion Theory, 2nd edn. Benjamin/Cummings, Menlo Part, CA.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1992

Authors and Affiliations

  • C. K. Madnia
    • 1
  • S. H. Frankel
    • 1
  • P. Givi
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Mechanical and Aerospace EngineeringState University of New YorkBuffaloU.S.A.

Personalised recommendations