Advertisement

Archiv für Mikrobiologie

, Volume 94, Issue 2, pp 159–171 | Cite as

Membrane leakage in Bacillus subtilis 168 induced by the hop constituents lupulone, humulone, isohumulone and humulinic acid

  • M. Teuber
  • Arno F. Schmalreck
Article

Summary

The bactericidal activity of the hop constituents lupulone, humulone, isohumulone and humulinic acid against Bacillus subtilis 168 is shown to result from primary membrane leakage. This process leads to complete inhibition of active transport of α-methyl-d-glucopyranoside and several amino acids into whole bacteria and isolated membrane vesicles within 5 min at 37°C at the corresponding minimal inhibitory concentrations of 1, 2, 25 and 250 μg/ml, respectively. Inhibition of the respiratory chain, of protein, RNA and DNA synthesis seems to be a secondary event.

Keywords

Bacillus Bactericidal Activity Minimal Inhibitory Concentration Inhibitory Concentration Bacillus Subtilis 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Anagnostopoulos, C., Spizizen, J.: Requirements for transformation in Bacillus subtilis. J. Bact. 81, 741–746 (1961)Google Scholar
  2. Armstrong, R. L., Harford, N., Kennett, R. H., Pierre, M. L. St., Sueoka, N.: Experimental methods for Bacillus subtilis. In: Methods in enzymology, Vol. 17 A, H. Tabor and C. W. Tabor, Eds., pp. 35–59. London-New York: Academic Press 1970Google Scholar
  3. Berlin, D. R., Stadtman, E. R.: A possible role of purine nucleotide phosphorylase in the regulation of purine uptake by Bacillus subtilis. J. Biol. Chem. 241, 2679–2686 (1966)Google Scholar
  4. Bishop, L. R.: The resins of hops as antibiotics. Symp. exp. Biol. (Brit.) III, 101–104 (1949)Google Scholar
  5. Brown, A. J., Clubb, D.: On the antiseptic properties of hops. J. Inst. Brew. 19, 261–295 (1913)Google Scholar
  6. Čepička, J.: Technological significant fractions of hop, resins. Scientific Papers, Inst. Chem. Dept. Techn. Prague E 32, pp. 5–22 (1971)Google Scholar
  7. Chapman, A. C.: On the preservative properties of hops. J. Inst. Brew. 31, 13–31 (1929)Google Scholar
  8. Chin, Y. C., Anderson, H. H., Alderton, G., Lewis, J. C.: Lupulone as tuberculustatic agent in vivo in mice. Proc. Soc. exp. Biol. (N. Y.) 7, 158–162 (1949)Google Scholar
  9. Erdmann, W. F.: Lupulon und Humulon, ihre antibakterielle Wirksamkeit und Anwendung bei tuberkulösen Infektionen. Teil I. Pharmazie 6, 442–451 (1951)Google Scholar
  10. Erdmann, W. F.: Lupulon und Humulon, ihre, antibakterielle Wirksamkeit und Anwendung bei tuberkulösen Infektionen. Teil II. Pharmazie 7, 75–86 (1952)Google Scholar
  11. Forst, A. W.: Die pharmakologische Wirkung des Hopfens. Zyma J. 1, (1949)Google Scholar
  12. Franklin, T. J., Snow, G. A.: Biochemie antimikrobieller Wirkstoffe. Berlin-Heidelberg-New York: Springer 1973Google Scholar
  13. Glitscher, E. A., Rische, H., Rohne, K., Keiger, G.: Experimentelle Untersuchungen über bakteriostatisch wirksame Stoffe aus Hopfen. Pharmazie 8, 950–954 (1953)Google Scholar
  14. Hamilton, W. A.: Membrane active antibacterial compounds. In: Inhibition and destruction of the microbial cell, W. B. Hugo, Ed., p. 77. London-New York: Academic Press 1971Google Scholar
  15. Hansch, C., Dunn, W. J.: Linear relationship between lipophilic character and biological activity of drugs. J. pharm. Sci. 61, 1–19 (1972)Google Scholar
  16. Hartl, A.: Vorisomerisierte Hopfenextrakte — Probleme der Herstellung, der Auflösung, der Haltbarkeit und Analyse. European Brewery Convention. Proceeding of the 13th Congress, Estoril, p. 115. Amsterdam-London-New York: Elsevier 1971Google Scholar
  17. Hayano, K., Fukui, S.: Purification and properties of 3-ketosucrose-forming enzyme from cells of Agrobacterium tumefaciens. J. biol. Chem. 242, 3665–3672 (1967)Google Scholar
  18. Hough, J. S., Howard, G. A., Slater, C. A.: Bacteriostatic activities of hop resin materials. J. Inst. Brew. 63, 331–333 (1957)Google Scholar
  19. Kaback, H. R.: The transport of sugars across isolated bacterial membranes. In: Current topics in membranes and transport, F. Bronner and A. Kleinzeller, Eds., pp. 35–99. London-New York: Academic Press 1970Google Scholar
  20. Kaback, H. R.: Bacterial membranes. In: Methods in enzymology, Vol. 22, W. J. Jakoby, Ed., pp. 99–120. London-New York: Academic Press 1971Google Scholar
  21. McKillen, M. N., Willecke, K., Pardee, A. B.: Citrate transport by Bacillus subtilis. In: Molecular basis of biological transport, Vol. 3, J. F. Woessner, Jr., and F. Huijing, Eds., pp. 249–270. London-New York: Academic Press 1972Google Scholar
  22. Kleyn, J., Hough, J.: The microbiology of brewing. Ann. Rev. Microbiol. 25, 583–608 (1971)Google Scholar
  23. Konings, W. N., Freese, E.: Amino acid transport in membrane vesicles of Bacillus subtilis. J. biol. Chem. 247, 2408–2418 (1972)Google Scholar
  24. Kroeber, L.: Der Hopfen als Arzneipflanze in alter und neuer Betrachtung. Pharma Medico 7, 10–19 (1939)Google Scholar
  25. MacLeod, R. A., Thurman, P., Rogers, H. J.: Comparative transport activity of intact cells, membrane vesicles and mesosomes of Bacillus licheniformis. J. Bact. 113, 329–340 (1973)Google Scholar
  26. Levaditi, C.: Etude expérimentelle de l'activité curative. III. Le Loupulon. Nouvel antibiotique extrait de l'houblon, agissant curativement dans la tuberculose expérimentelle de la souris. Schweiz. Z. Path. 12, 572–574 (1949)Google Scholar
  27. Lewis, J. C., Alderton, G., Carson, J. F., Reynolds, D. M., Stitt, F.: Antibacterial agents from hops. U.S.State Dept. Agr. Agr. Res., Circular AIC, p. 231 (1948)Google Scholar
  28. Lowry, O. H., Rosebrough, N. J., Farr, A. L., Randall, R. J.: Protein measurement with the Folin phenol reagent. J. biol. Chem. 193, 265–275 (1951)Google Scholar
  29. Macrae, R. M.: Significance of the use of hop in regard to the biological stability of beer. J. Inst. Brew. 70, 340–344 (1964)Google Scholar
  30. Michener, H. D., Snell, N., Jansen, E. F.: Antifungal activity of hop resin constituents and a new method for isolation of lupulone. Arch. Biochem. 19, 199–208 (1948)Google Scholar
  31. Mirsky, R., Barlow, V.: Purification and properties of ATPase from the cytoplasmatic membrane of Bacillus megaterium KM. Biochim. biophys. Acta (Amst.) 241, 835–845 (1971)Google Scholar
  32. Otter, G. E., Silvester, D. J., Taylor, L.: Automatic analysis of hop resins by ion exchange chromatography. J. Inst. Brew. 78, 57–64 (1972)Google Scholar
  33. Oxender, D. L.: Amino acid transport in microorganisms. In: Metabolic transport, Vol. VI (third edition), L. E. Hokin, Ed., pp. 133–185. London-New York: Academic Press 1972Google Scholar
  34. Riedl, W.: Konstitution und Synthese der Hopfenbitterstoffe Humulon und Lupulon sowie einiger Analoga. Chem. Ber. 85, 692–710 (1952)Google Scholar
  35. Riedl, W.: VI. Mitteilung über Hopfenbitterstoffe. Synthese einiger Lupulon-Analoga mit abgewandeltem Acyl-Rest. Ann. 585, 38–42 (1954)Google Scholar
  36. Roseman, S.: Carbohydrate transport in bacterial cells. In: Metabolic transport, Vol. VI (third edition), L. E. Hokin, Ed., pp. 41–89. London-New York: Academic Press 1972Google Scholar
  37. Sacks, L. E., Humphreys, E. M.: Antagonistic effect of serum on bacteriostatic action of lupulone. Proc. Soc. exp. Biol. (N. Y.) 76, 234–238 (1951)Google Scholar
  38. Schmalreck, A.: Einfluß der Hopfenbitterstoffe Lupulon, Humulon, Isohumulon und Humulinsäure auf Bacillus subtilis. Diplomarbeit, Technische Universität München 1972Google Scholar
  39. Schuster, K.: Bier. In: Handbuch der Lebensmittelchemie, J. Schormüller, Ed., Vol. VII: Alkoholische Genußmittel, pp. 45–171. Berlin-Heidelberg-New York: Springer 1968Google Scholar
  40. Shimwell, J. L.: On the relation between the staining properties of bacteria and their reaction towards hop antiseptic. J. Inst. Brew. 43, 111–118 (1937)Google Scholar
  41. Simoni, R. D.: Macromolecular characterization of bacterial transport systems. In: Membrane molecular biology, S. F. Fox and A. D. Keth, Eds., pp. 289–322. Palo Alto: Sinauer Associates Inc. Publishers 1972Google Scholar
  42. Skinner, F. A.: Antibiotics. In: Moderne Methoden der Pflanzenanalyse, Vol. III, K. Peach and M. V. Tracey, Eds., pp. 626–725. Berlin-Göttingen-Heidelberg: Springer 1955Google Scholar
  43. Stevens, R.: The chemistry of hop constituents. Chem. Rev. 67, 19–71 (1967)Google Scholar
  44. Teuber, M.: Chromatographische Trennung von Hopfeninhaltsstoffen und deren Einfluß auf Mikroorganismen. Dissertation, Ludwig-Maximilian-Universität München 1962Google Scholar
  45. Teuber, M.: Low antibiotic potency of isohumulone. Appl. Microbiol. 19, 871 (1970)Google Scholar
  46. Teuber, M., Schmalreck, A.: The bactericidal mode of action of the hop constituents lupulone, humulone, isohumulone and humulinic acid. Abstr. Comm. Special Meet. Dublin, FEBS, No. 100 (1973)Google Scholar
  47. Vonderbank, H.: Die Antibiotika außer Penicillin. Arzneimittel-Forsch. 1, 189–195 (1951)Google Scholar
  48. Wackerbauer, K., Emeis, C. C.: Über die bierschädlichen Bakterien der Gattung Lactobacillus (Biermilehsäurestäbchen II). Mschr. Brau. 22, 328–333 (1968)Google Scholar
  49. Walker, T. K., Blakebrough, N.: Bacteriostatic power of humulone boiling product. J. Inst. Brew. 58, 13–24 (1952)Google Scholar
  50. Walker, T. K., Parker, A.: Report on the preservative principles of hops. Part XVIII. J. Inst. Brew. 43, 17–30 (1937)Google Scholar
  51. Weiß, R. F.: Phytotherapeutische Möglichkeiten bei Schlafstörungen. Phys. Med. u. Reh. 14, 180–184 (1973)Google Scholar
  52. Weitzel, G., Jackisch, R., Meier-Gerwert, H., Zinser, D.: Cytostatische Eigenschaften alkylverzweigter Aldehyde der Kettenlänge C8. Hoppe Seilers Z. physiol. Chem. 353, 641–653 (1972)Google Scholar
  53. Würzbach, K.: Symptom Schlaflosigkeit (Ursachen, Bedeutung und Behandlung der Agrypnie). Med. Welt (Berl.) 22, 1224–1226 (1961)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1973

Authors and Affiliations

  • M. Teuber
    • 1
  • Arno F. Schmalreck
    • 1
  1. 1.Abteilung MikrobiologieInstitut für Botanik der Technischen UniversitätMünchen

Personalised recommendations