Social Indicators Research

, Volume 16, Issue 3, pp 263–274 | Cite as

Happiness of the very wealthy

  • Ed Diener
  • Jeff Horwitz
  • Robert A. Emmons


The subjective well-being of very wealthy persons was compared with that of a control group who lived in the same geographical area. One hundred persons from Forbes list of wealthiest Americans were queried, as well as 100 control persons selected from telephone directories. The 49 wealthy respondents reported average levels of subjective well-being which were higher than the 62 control group respondents and any subgroup of respondents in a national sample. However, there were unhappy wealthy people and the average level of this group was only modestly higher than for other groups. None of the respondents believed that money is a major source of happiness. When the major sources of happiness mentioned by the two groups were coded for Maslow's needs, it was found that the wealthy group more often mentioned self-esteem and self-actualization and less frequently mentioned physiological and security needs.


Average Level Geographical Area National Sample Control Person Group Respondent 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. AndrewsF. M., and S. B.Withey: 1976, Social Indicators of Well-Being: America's Perception of Life Quality (Plenum, New York).Google Scholar
  2. CampbellA.: 1981, The Sense of Well-Being in America: Recent Patterns and Trends (McGraw-Hill, New York).Google Scholar
  3. CampbellA., P. E.Converse, and W. L.Rodgers: 1976, The Quality of American Life (Russell Sage, New York).Google Scholar
  4. CsikszentmihalyiM.: 1975, Beyond Boredom and Anxiety (Jossey-Bass, San Francisco).Google Scholar
  5. DienerE.: 1984, ‘Subjective Well-Being’, Psychological Bulletin 95, pp. 542–575.Google Scholar
  6. Diener, E., R. J. Larsen, S. Levine, and R. A. Emmons: 1985, ‘Intensity and frequency: Dimensions underlying positive and negative affect’, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 48, in press.Google Scholar
  7. Diener, E., E. Sandvik and R. J. Larsen: 1985, ‘Age and sex affects for emotional intensity’, Developmental Psychology, in press.Google Scholar
  8. EasterlinR. A.: 1974, ‘Does economic growth improve the human lot? Some empirical evidence’, in P. A.David and W. M.Reder (eds.), Nations and households in economic growth (Academic Press, New York), pp. 89–125.Google Scholar
  9. FordyceM. W.: 1977, ‘The happiness measures: A sixty second index of emotional well-being and mental health’, unpublished paper, Edison Community College, Fort Myers, Florida.Google Scholar
  10. FreedmanJ.: 1978, Happy People: What Happiness Is, Who Has It, and Why. (Harcourt, New York).Google Scholar
  11. Larsen, R. J. and E. Diener: 1984, ‘A multitrait, multimethod examination of affect structure: Hedonic level and emotional intensity’, Personality and Individual Differences, in press.Google Scholar
  12. Larsen, R. J., E. Diener and R. A. Emmons: 1983, ‘Validity and meaning of measures of subjective well-being’, paper presented at the annual meeting of the Midwestern Psychological Association, Chicago.Google Scholar
  13. LarsonR.: 1978, ‘Thirty years of research on the subjective well-being of older Americans’, Journal of Gerontology 33, pp. 109–125.Google Scholar
  14. MaslowA. H.: 1954, Motivation and Personality (Harper & Row, New York).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© D. Reidel Publishing Company 1985

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ed Diener
    • 1
  • Jeff Horwitz
  • Robert A. Emmons
  1. 1.Psychology DepartmentUniversity of IllinoisChampaignUSA

Personalised recommendations