Marine Biology

, Volume 74, Issue 2, pp 151–160 | Cite as

Particle rejection by Calanus pacificus: discrimination between similarly sized particles

  • M. E. Huntley
  • K.-G. Barthel
  • J. L. Star


Particle rejection behavior was studied for late-stage copepodites and adult females of Calanus pacificus collected from La Jolla Bay, California (32oN; 117oW) in spring and summer of both 1979 and 1982. Several particles of approximately the same size were offered, both singly and in mixtures, to C. pacificus. In the first set of experiments the copepods were presented with choices between a diatom, Thalassiosira weissflogii (13.1 μm equivalent spherical diam), and polystyrene beads of two sizes (11.1 and 16.5 μm diam). In the second set of experiments they were presented with choices between one of two dinoflagellates, Gyrodinium dorsum (27 μm diam) or Peridinium trochoideum (22 μm diam), and polystyrene beads of three sizes (15, 20 and 25 μm diam). When offered mixtures of cells and beads, the filtration and ingestion rates were significantly greater on the cells than on the beads, irrespective of bead size. We also find that C. pacificus demonstrates a clear preference for G. dorsum relative to P. trochoideum. Our results cannot be explained by a model of passive, size-selective feeding.


Filtration Polystyrene Ingestion Rate Adult Female Dinoflagellate 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literature cited

  1. Alcaraz, M., G.-A. Paffenhöfer and J. R. Strickler: Catching the algae: a first account of visual observations on filter-feeding calanoids. In: Evolution and ecology of zooplankton communities, pp 241–248. Ed. by C. Kerfoot, Hanover, New Hampshire: New England University Press 1980Google Scholar
  2. Alldredge, A. L.: The impact of appendicularian grazing on natural food concentration in situ. Limnol. Oceanogr. 26, 247–257 (1981)Google Scholar
  3. Boyd, C. M.: Selection of particle sizes by filtering copepods: a plea for reason. Limnol. Oceanogr. 21, 175–180 (1976)Google Scholar
  4. Cannon, H. G.: On the feeding mechanism of the copepods Calanus finmarchicus and Diaptomus gracilis. J. exp. Biol. 6, 131–144 (1928)Google Scholar
  5. Conover, R. J. and M. E. Huntley: General rules of grazing in pelagic ecosystems. In: Primary productivity in the sea, pp 461–485. Ed. by P. Falkowski. New York: Plenum Press 1980Google Scholar
  6. Cullen, J. J., S. G. Horrigan, M. E. Huntley and F. M. H. Reid: Yellow water in La Jolla Bay, California, July 1980. I. A bloom of the dinoflagellate, Gymnodinium flavum Kofoid & Swezy. J. exp. mar. Biol. Ecol. 63, 67–80 (1982)Google Scholar
  7. Donaghay, P. L. and L. F. Small: Food selection capabilities of the estuarine copepod Acartia clausi. Mar. Biol. 52, 137–146 (1979)Google Scholar
  8. Eppley, R. W., R. W. Holmes and J. D. H. Strickland: Sinking rates of marine phytoplankton measured with a fluorometer. J. exp. mar. Biol. Ecol. 1, 191–208 (1967)Google Scholar
  9. Fiedler, P.: Zooplankton avoidance and reduced grazing responses to Gymnodinium splendens (Dinophyceae). Limnol. Oceanogr. 27, 961–965 (1982)Google Scholar
  10. Frost, B. W.: Effects of the size and concentration of food particles on the feeding behavior of the marine planktonic copepod Calanus pacificus. Limnol. Oceanogr. 17, 805–815 (1972)Google Scholar
  11. Frost, B. W.: Feeding behavior of Calanus pacificus in mixtures of food particles. Limnol. Oceanogr. 22, 472–491 (1977)Google Scholar
  12. Gifford, D. N., R. N. Bohrer and C. M. Boyd: Spines on diatoms: do copepods care? Limnol. Oceanogr. 26, 971–981 (1981)Google Scholar
  13. Harbison, G. R. and V. L. McAlister: The filter-feeding rates and particle retention efficiencies of three species of Cyclosalpa (Tunicata, Thaliacea). Limnol. Oceanogr. 24, 875–892 (1979)Google Scholar
  14. Harbison, G. R. and V. L. McAlister. Fact and artifact in copepod feeding experiments. Limnol. Oceanogr. 25, 971–981 (1980)Google Scholar
  15. Hughes, R. N.: Optimal foraging in the marine context. Oceanogr. mar. Biol. A. Rev. 18, 428–449 (1980)Google Scholar
  16. Huntley, M. E.: Yellow water in La Jolla Bay, California, July, 1980. II. Suppression of zooplankton grazing. J. exp. mar. Biol. Ecol. 63, 81–91 (1982)Google Scholar
  17. Ivlev, V. S.: Experimental ecology of the feeding of fishes, 302 pp. Translated from Russian by D. Scott. New Haven: Yale University Press 1961Google Scholar
  18. Jørgensen, C. B.: Biology of suspension feeding, 357 pp. Oxford: Pergamon Press 1966Google Scholar
  19. Katona, S.: Evidence for sex pheromones in planktonic copepods. Limnol. Oceanogr. 18, 574–583 (1973)Google Scholar
  20. Koehl, M. A. R. and J. R. Strickler: Copepod feeding currents: food capture at low Reynolds number. Limnol. Oceanogr. 26, 1062–1073 (1981)Google Scholar
  21. Lam, R. K. and B. Frost: Model of copepod filtering response to changes in size and concentration of food. Limnol. Oceanogr. 21, 490–500 (1976)Google Scholar
  22. Loomis, W. F.: Glutathione control of the specific feeding reactions of Hydra. Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci. 62, 209–228 (1955)Google Scholar
  23. Lund, J. W. G., C. Kipling and E. D. LeCren: The inverted microscope method of estimating algal numbers and the statistical basis of estimations by counting. Hydrobiologia 11, 143–170 (1958)Google Scholar
  24. McLachlan, J., A. J. McInnes and M. Falk: Studies on chitan (chitin: poly-n-acetyl glucosamine) fibers of the diatom Thalassiosira fluviatilis Hustedt. Can. J. Bot. 43, 707–713 (1965)Google Scholar
  25. Mullin, M. M.: Some factors affecting the feeding of marine copepods of the genus Calanus. Limnol. Oceanogr. 8, 239–250 (1963)Google Scholar
  26. Nival, P. and S. Nival: Particle retention efficiencies of an herbivorous copepod, Acartia clausi (adult and copepodite stages): effects of grazing. Limnol. Oceanogr. 21, 24–38 (1976)Google Scholar
  27. Paffenhöfer, G.-A., J. R. Strickler and M. Alcaraz: Suspensionfeeding by herbivorous calanoid copepods: a cinematographic study. Mar. Biol. 67, 193–199 (1982)Google Scholar
  28. Poulet, S. A. and P. Marsot: Chemosensory grazing by marine calanoid copepods (Arthropoda: Crustacea). Science, N.Y. 200, 1403–1405 (1978)Google Scholar
  29. Runge, J. A.: Effects of hunger and season on the feeding behavior of Calanus pacificus. Limnol. Oceanogr. 26, 134–145 (1980)Google Scholar
  30. Steele, J. H. and B. W. Frost: The structure of plankton communities. Proc. R. Soc. (Ser. B) 280, 485–535 (1977)Google Scholar
  31. Strickler, J. R.: Calanoid copepods, feeding currents, and the role of gravity. Science, N.Y. 218, 158–160 (1982)Google Scholar
  32. White, H. H.: Effects of dinoflagellate bioluminescence on the ingestion rates of herbivorous zooplankton. J. exp. mar. Biol. Ecol. 36, 217–224 (1979)Google Scholar
  33. Williams, P. J. LeB.: Incorporation of microheterotrophic processes into the classical paradigm of the planktonic foodweb. Kieler Meeresforsch. (Sonderh.) 5, 1–28 (1981)Google Scholar
  34. Wroblewski, J. S. and J. J. O'Brien: A spatial model of phytoplankton patchiness. Mar. Biol. 35, 161–175 (1976)Google Scholar
  35. Wyatt, T. and J. Horwood: Model which generates red tides. Nature, Lond. 244, 238–240 (1973)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1983

Authors and Affiliations

  • M. E. Huntley
    • 1
  • K.-G. Barthel
    • 1
  • J. L. Star
    • 2
  1. 1.Institute of Marine Resources, A-018, Scripps Institution of OceanographyUniversity of CaliforniaLa JollaUSA
  2. 2.Department of GeographyUniversity of California, Santa BarbaraSanta BarbaraUSA

Personalised recommendations