Advertisement

Synthese

, Volume 109, Issue 1, pp 1–25 | Cite as

The logic of questions as a theory of erotetic arguments

  • Andrzej Wiśniewski
Article

Abstract

This paper argues for the idea that the logic of questions should focus its attention on the analysis of arguments in which questions play the role of conclusions. The relevant concepts of validity are discussed and the concept of the logic of questions of a semantically interpreted formalized language is introduced.

Keywords

Relevant Concept 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Belnap, N. D.: 1969, ‘Questions, Their Presuppositions and How They Can Fail to Arise’, in K. Lambert (ed.), The Logical Way of Doing Things, Yale University Press, New Haven, pp. 23–37.Google Scholar
  2. Belnap, N. D. and Th. B. Steel: 1976, The Logic of Questions and Answers, Yale University Press, New Haven.Google Scholar
  3. Bromberger, S.: 1992, On What We Know We Don't Know. Explanation, Theory, Linguistics, and How Questions Shape Them, The University of Chicago Press, Chicago and Center for Study of Language and Information, Stanford.Google Scholar
  4. Buszkowski, W.: 1989, ‘Presuppositional Completeness’, Studia Logica 48, 23–44.Google Scholar
  5. Harrah, D.: 1984, ‘The Logic of Questions’, in: D. Gabbay and F. Guenthner (eds.), Handbook of Philosophical Logic. Volume II: Extensions of Classical Logic, D. Reidel, Dordrecht, pp. 715–764.Google Scholar
  6. Hintikka, J.: 1981, ‘On the Logic of an Interrogative Model of Scientific Inquiry’, Synthese 47, 69–83.Google Scholar
  7. Hintikka, J.: 1985, ‘A Spectrum of Logics of Questioning’, Philosophica 35, 135–50.Google Scholar
  8. Hintikka, J.: 1987a, ‘The Interrogative Approach to Inquiry and Probabilistic Inference’, Erkenntnis 26, 429–42.Google Scholar
  9. Hintikka, J.: 1987b, ‘The Fallacy of Fallacies’, Argumentation 1, 211–238.Google Scholar
  10. Hintikka, J.: 1988, ‘What Is the Logic of Experimental Inquiry’, Synthese 74, 173–90.Google Scholar
  11. Hintikka, J.: 1989, ‘The Role of Logic in Argumentation’, The Monist 72, 3–24.Google Scholar
  12. Hintikka, J.: 1992, ‘The Interrogative Model of Inquiry as a General Theory of Argumentation’, Communication and Cognition 25, 221–242.Google Scholar
  13. Kubiński, T.: 1980, An Outline of the Logical Theory of Questions, Akademie-Verlag, Berlin.Google Scholar
  14. Kuipers, T. A. F. and A. Wiśniewski: 1994, ‘An Erotetic Approach to Explanation by Specification’, Erkenntnis 40, 377–402.Google Scholar
  15. Shoesmith, D. J. and T. J. Smiley: 1978, Multiple-Conclusion Logic, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  16. Wiśniewski, A.: 1985, ‘Propositional Logic and Erotetic Inferences’, Bulletin of the Section of Logic, Polish Academy of Sciences 14(2), 72–8. (Correction, ibid., 15(1), 1986, 35).Google Scholar
  17. Wiśniewski, A.: 1989, ‘The Generating of Questions: A Study of Some Erotetic Aspects of Rationality’, in: L. Koj, A. Wiśniewski, Inquiries into the Generating and Proper Use of Questions, Wydawnictwo Naukowe UMCS, Lublin, pp. 91–155.Google Scholar
  18. Wiśniewski, A.: 1990a, Stawianie pytań: logika i racjonalność, Wydawnictwo Naukowe UMCS, Lublin.Google Scholar
  19. Wiśniewski, A.: 1990b, ‘Implied Questions’, Manuscrito 13(2), 23–38.Google Scholar
  20. Wiśniewski, A.: 1991, ‘Erotetic Arguments: A Preliminary Analysis’, Studia Logica 50, 261–74.Google Scholar
  21. Wiśniewski, A.: 1994, ‘Erotetic Implications’, Journal of Philosophical Logic 23, 173–95.Google Scholar
  22. Wiśniewski, A.: 1995, The Posing of Questions: Logical Foundations of Erotetic Inferences, Kiuwer, Dordrecht.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1996

Authors and Affiliations

  • Andrzej Wiśniewski
    • 1
  1. 1.Institute of PhilosophyTadeusz Kotarbiński Pedagogical UniversityZielona GóraPoland

Personalised recommendations