Advertisement

Synthese

, Volume 107, Issue 2, pp 249–269 | Cite as

The new B-Theory's tu quoque argument

  • William Lane Craig
Article

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Adams, R. M. and H.-N. Castañeda: 1983, ‘Knowledge and Self: A Correspondence between R. M. Adams and H.-N. Castañeda’, in James E. Tomberlin (ed.), Agent, Language and the Structure of the World, Hackett Publishing, Indianapolis, pp. 293–310.Google Scholar
  2. Almog, J., J. Perry, and H. Wettstein (eds.): 1989, Themes from Kaplan, Oxford University Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
  3. Barwise, J. and J. Perry: 1983, Situations and Attitudes, MIT Press, Cambridge Mass.Google Scholar
  4. Böer, S. and W. Lycan: 1980, ‘Who Me?’, Philosophical Review 89, 427–466.Google Scholar
  5. Cartwright, R.: 1966, ‘Propositions’, in R. Butter (ed.), Analytical Philosophy, Basil Blackwell, Oxford, pp. 92–94.Google Scholar
  6. Castañeda, H.-N.: 1969, ‘On the Phenomeno-Logic of the I’, in Akten des XIV Internationalen Kongresses für Philosophie 3, University of Vienna Press, Vienna, pp. 206–269.Google Scholar
  7. Castañeda, H.-N.: 1983, ‘Reply to Ernest Sosa: Self-Reference and Propositions’, in James E. Tomberlin (ed.), Agent, Language and the Structure of the World, Hackett Publishing, Indianapolis, pp. 285–292.Google Scholar
  8. Castañeda, H.-N.: 1990, ‘Indexicality: The Transparent Subjective Mechanism for Encountering a World’, Nous 24, 723–734.Google Scholar
  9. Chisholm, R.: 1981, The First Person, University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis.Google Scholar
  10. Chisholm, R.: 1989, ‘Why Singular Propositions?’ in Almog (1989).Google Scholar
  11. Craig, W. L.: 1991, Divine Foreknowledge and Human Freedom: The Coherence of Theism: Omniscience, Studies in Intellectual History vol. 19, E. J. Brill, Leiden.Google Scholar
  12. Craig, W. L.: 1996, ‘Tense and the New B-Theory of Language’, Philosophy 71, 5–26.Google Scholar
  13. Farrell Smith, J.: 1989, ‘Russell on Indexicals and Scientific Knowledge’, in C. Wade Savage and C. Anthony Andersen (eds.), Rereading Russell, Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science vol. 12. University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis, pp. 119–137.Google Scholar
  14. Frege, G.: 1977, ‘Thoughts’, in P. T. Geach and R. H. Stoothoff (eds.), Logical Investigations, Basil Blackwell, Oxford.Google Scholar
  15. Kaplan, D.: 1979, ‘The Logic of Demonstratives’, in Peter A. French, Theodore E. Uehling, and Howard K. Wettstein (eds.), Contemporary Perspectives in the Philosophy of Langauge, University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis, pp. 401–412.Google Scholar
  16. Kaplan, D.: 1989, ‘Demonstratives: An Essay on the Semantics, Metaphysics and Epistemology of Demonstratives and Other Indexicals’, in Almog (1989), pp. 481–563.Google Scholar
  17. Kaplan, D.: 1989a, ‘Afterthoughts’, in 565–614.Google Scholar
  18. Kvanig, J. L.: 1986, The Possibility of an All-knowing God, St. Martin's Press, New York.Google Scholar
  19. Lewis, D.: 1979, ‘Attitudes De Dicto and De Se’, Philosophical Review 88, 513–543.Google Scholar
  20. Lycan, W.: 1994, Personal Communication of July 18.Google Scholar
  21. Madell, G.: 1988, Mind and Materialism, Edinburgh University Press, Edinburgh.Google Scholar
  22. Madell, G.: 1981, The Identity of the Self, Edinburgh University Press, Edinburgh.Google Scholar
  23. McTaggart, J. M. E.: 1927, in C. D. Broad (ed.), The Nature of Existence, 2 vols., reprinted 1968, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  24. Mellor, D. H.: 1981, Real Time, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  25. Oaklander, N.: 1991, ‘A Defense of the New Tenseless Theory of Time’, Philosophical Quarterly 41, 26–38.Google Scholar
  26. Perry, J.: 1977, ‘Frege on Demonstratives’, Philosophical Review 86, 474–497.Google Scholar
  27. Perry, J.: 1979, ‘The Problem of the Essential Indexical’, Noûs 13, 3–29.Google Scholar
  28. Perry, J.: 1988, ‘Cognitive Significance and New Theories of Reference’, Noûs 22, 1–18.Google Scholar
  29. Recanati, F.: 1990, ‘Direct Reference, Meaning, and Thought’, Noûs 24, 697–722.Google Scholar
  30. Richard, M.: 1981, ‘Temporalism and Eternalism’, Philosophical Studies 39, 1–13.Google Scholar
  31. Russell, B.: 1940, An Inquiry into Meaning and Truth, George, Allen & Unwin, London.Google Scholar
  32. Russell, B.: 1948, Human Knowledge: Its Scope and Limits, Simon and Schuster, New York.Google Scholar
  33. Salmon, N.: 1989, ‘Tense and Singular Propositions’, in Almog (1989), pp. 331–392.Google Scholar
  34. Smith, Q.: 1987, ‘Problems with the New Tenseless Theory of Time’, Philosophical Studies 52, 371–92.Google Scholar
  35. Smith, Q.: 1993, Language and Time, Oxford University Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
  36. Sosa, E.: 1983, ‘Consciousness of the Self and of the Present’, in James E. Tomberlin (ed.), Agent, Language and the Structure of the World, Hackett Publishing, Indianapolis, pp. 131–146.Google Scholar
  37. Swinburne, R.: 1990, ‘Tensed Facts’, American Philosophical Quarterly, 27, 117–130.Google Scholar
  38. Wettstein, H.: 1986, ‘Has Semantics Rested on a Mistake?’, Journal of Philosophy 8, 185–209.Google Scholar
  39. Yourgrau, P.: 1982, ‘Frege, Perry and Demonstratives’, Canadian Journal of Philosophy 12, 725–752.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1996

Authors and Affiliations

  • William Lane Craig
    • 1
  1. 1.MariettaUSA

Personalised recommendations