Advertisement

Synthese

, Volume 88, Issue 3, pp 399–417 | Cite as

Artificial intelligence and personal identity

  • David Cole
Article

Abstract

Considerations of personal identity bear on John Searle's Chinese Room argument, and on the opposed position that a computer itself could really understand a natural language. In this paper I develop the notion of a virtual person, modelled on the concept of virtual machines familiar in computer science. I show how Searle's argument, and J. Maloney's attempt to defend it, fail. I conclude that Searle is correct in holding that no digital machine could understand language, but wrong in holding that artificial minds are impossible: minds and persons are not the same as the machines, biological or electronic, that realize them.

Keywords

Artificial Intelligence Computer Science Natural Language Virtual Machine Personal Identity 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. American Psychiatric Association: 1987, Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, III, American Psychiatric Association, Washington D.C.Google Scholar
  2. Anderson, David: 1987, ‘Is the Chinese Room the Real Thing?’, Philosophy 62, 389–93.Google Scholar
  3. Braun, B. G.: 1984, ‘Toward a Theory of Multiple Personality and Other Dissociative Phenomena’, Symposium on Multiple Personality, Psychiatric Clinics of North America, Saunders, Philadelphia, Vol. 7, pp. 171–93.Google Scholar
  4. Cam, Philip: 1990, ‘Searle on Strong AI’, Australasian Journal of Philosophy 68, 103–08.Google Scholar
  5. Carleton, Lawrence: 1984, ‘Programs, Language Understanding and Searle’, Synthese 59, 219–30.Google Scholar
  6. Churchland, Paul M. and Patricia Smith Churchland: 1990, ‘Could a Machine Think?’, Scientific American January, 32–37.Google Scholar
  7. Cole, David: 1984, ‘Thought and Thought Experiments’, Philosophical Studies 45, 431–44.Google Scholar
  8. Cole, David: 1990, ‘Cognitive Inquiry and the Philosophy of Mind’, in Cole, Fetzer and Rankin (eds.).Google Scholar
  9. Cole, David: 1991, ‘Artificial Minds: Cam on Searle’, Australasian Journal of Philosophy 69(3).Google Scholar
  10. Cole, David, James Fetzer, and Terry Rankin (eds.): 1990, Philosophy, Mind, and Cognitive Inquiry, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht.Google Scholar
  11. Cole, David and Robert Foelber: 1984, ‘Contingent Materialism’, Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 65, 74–85.Google Scholar
  12. Double, Richard: 1983, ‘Searle, Programs and Functionalism’, Nature and System 5, 107–14.Google Scholar
  13. Dretske, Fred: 1985, ‘Machines and the Mental’, Presidential Address delivered before the Central Division of the American Philosophical Association (reprinted in Cole, Fetzer & Rankin (eds.)).Google Scholar
  14. Fields, C. A.: 1984, ‘Double on Searle's Chinese Room’, Nature and System 6, 51–54.Google Scholar
  15. Grice, H. Paul: 1941, ‘Personal Identity’, Mind 50, 330–50.Google Scholar
  16. Lewis, David: 1976, ‘Survival and Identity’, in A. E. Rorty (ed.), The Identities of Persons, University of California Press, Berkeley.Google Scholar
  17. Maloney, J. Christopher: 1987, ‘The Right Stuff’, Synthese 70, 349–72.Google Scholar
  18. Perry, John (ed.): 1975, Personal Identity, University of California Press, Berkeley.Google Scholar
  19. Perry, John: 1978, A Dialogue on Personal Identity and Immortality, Hackett Publishing Company, Indianapolis.Google Scholar
  20. Quinton, A. M.: 1962, ‘The Soul’, Journal of Philosophy 59, 393–409 (reprinted in Perry 1975).Google Scholar
  21. Rapaport, William J.: 1986, ‘Searle's Experiments with Thought’, Philosophy of Science 53, 271–79.Google Scholar
  22. Rapaport, William J.: 1988, ‘Syntactic Semantics’, in James Fetzer (ed.), Aspects of Artificial Intelligence, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht.Google Scholar
  23. Rapaport, William J.: 1988, ‘Review of John Searle's Minds, Brains and Science’, Noûs XXII, 585–609.Google Scholar
  24. Rapaport, William J.: 1990, ‘Computer Processes and Virtual Persons: Comments on Cole's ‘Artificial Intelligence and Personal Identity’’, Technical Report 90-13, Department of Computer Science, State University of New York at Buffalo.Google Scholar
  25. Rey, Georges: 1986, ‘What's Really Going on in Searle's “Chinese Room”’, Philosophical Studies 50, 169–85.Google Scholar
  26. Sarason, Irwin G. and Barbara R. Sarason: 1987, Abnormal Psychology, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.Google Scholar
  27. Searle, John: 1980, ‘Minds, Brains and Programs’, The Behavioural and Brain Sciences 3, 417–57.Google Scholar
  28. Searle, John: 1982, ‘The Myth of the Computer’, New York Review of Books, 29 April 1982, pp. 3–6.Google Scholar
  29. Searle, John: 1984, Minds, Brains, and Programs, Harvard University Press, Cambridge MA.Google Scholar
  30. Searle, John: 1990, ‘Is the Brain's Mind a Computer Program?’, Scientific American January, 26–31.Google Scholar
  31. Sharvy, Richard: 1983, ‘It Ain't the Meat, It's the Motion’, Inquiry 26, 125–31.Google Scholar
  32. Smolensky, Paul: 1988, ‘On the Proper Treatment of Connectionism’, Behavioural and Brain Sciences 11(1), 1–74 (reprinted in Cole, Fetzer and Rankin (eds.)).Google Scholar
  33. Whitmer, Jeffrey: 1983, ‘Intentionality, Artifical Intelligence and the Causal Powers of the Brain’, Auslegung 10, 194–210, 214–17.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1991

Authors and Affiliations

  • David Cole
    • 1
  1. 1.Dept. of PhilosophyUniversity of Minnesota/DuluthDuluthUSA

Personalised recommendations