Archives of Dermatological Research

, Volume 279, Issue 6, pp 398–401 | Cite as

Distribution of skin surface pH on the forehead and cheek of adults

  • A. Zlotogorski
Original Contributions


The skin surface pH on the forehead and cheek of 574 men and women aged 18–95 was measured. No differences were found between men and women regarding forehead and cheek pH distribution. The group over the age of 80 showed higher pH values on both the forehead and the cheek. In 89% of the subjects measured, the skin surface pH on the cheek was higher than that on the forehead. The central 90%, i.e., the “representative range”, for the population below the age of 80 is between 4.0–5.5 on the forehead and between 4.2–5.9 on the cheek.

Key words

Skin pH Forehead Cheek Representative range 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Anderson DS (1951) The acid-base balance of the skin. Br J Dermatol 63:283–295Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Arbenz VH (1952) Untersuchungen über die pH-Werte der normalen Hautoberfläche. Dermatologica 105:333–353Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Behrendt H, Green M (1971) Patterns of skin pH from birth through adolescence with a synopsis on skin growth. Thomas, Springfield, Ill, p 27 and p 54Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bernstein ET, Herrmann F (1942) The acidity on the surface of the skin. NY State J Med 42:436–442Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Blank IH (1939) Measurement of pH of the skin surface. II. pH of the exposed surfaces of adults with no apparent skin lesions. J Invest Dermatol 2:75–79Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Bradley JV (1968) Distribution free statistical tests. Prentice-Hall, New Jersey, pp 367–369Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Braun-Falco O, Korting HC (1986) Der normale pH-Wert der menschlichen Haut. Haut 37:126–129Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Dikstein S, Hartzshtark A, Bercovici P (1984) The dependence of low pressure indentation, slackness and surface pH on age in forehead skin of women. J Soc Cosm Chem 35:221–228Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Draize JH (1942) The determination of the pH of the skin of man and common laboratory animals. J Invest Dermatol 5:77–85Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Heuss E (1892) Die Reaktion des Schweißes beim gesunden Menschen. Monatsschr Prakt Dermatol 14:343, 400, 501Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Jolly HW Jr, Hailey CW, Netick J (1961) pH determinations of the skin. Readings under normal and abnormal conditions. J Invest Dermatol 36:305–308Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Marchionini A, Hausknecht W (1938) Säuremantel der Haut und Bakterienabwehr. I. Mitteilung. Die regionäre Verschiedenheit der Wasserstoffionenkonzentration der Hautoberfläche. Klin Wochenschr 17:663–666Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Sachs L (1981) Applied statistics: a handbook of techniques. Springer, Heidelberg Berlin New York, pp 536–539Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Stephens MA (1974) EDF statistics for goodness of fit and some comparison. Am Stat Assoc 69:730–737Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Tronnier H, Bussius H (1961) Über die Zusammenhänge zwischen dem pH-Wert der Haut und ihrer Alkalineutralisationsfähigkeit. Z Hautkr 30:177–195Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Turek BA, Dikstein S (1985) Skin pH-Workshop report from the 4th International Symposium on Bioengineering and the Skin, 1983. Bioeng Skin 1:57–58Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Wyngaarden JB (1985) The use and interpretation of laboratory-derived data. In: Wyngaarden JB, Smith LH (eds) Cecil textbook of medicine. Saunders, Philadelphia, pp 61–63Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Zar JH (1984) Nonparametric analysis of variance. In: Kurtz B (ed) Biostatistical analysis. Prentice-Hall, New Jersey, pp 176–179Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Zar JH (1984) Paired-sample testing by ranks. In: Kurtz B (ed) Biostatistical analysis. Prentice-Hall, New Jersey, pp 153–156Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1987

Authors and Affiliations

  • A. Zlotogorski
    • 1
  1. 1.Hebrew University of JerusalemIsrael

Personalised recommendations