Archive for History of Exact Sciences

, Volume 10, Issue 3–5, pp 207–328 | Cite as

A study of Henri Poincaré's “Sur la Dynamique de l'Électron”

  • Arthur I. Miller
Article

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Bibliography

  1. Abraham, M., “Dynamik des Elektrons,” Nachr. Ges. Wiss. Göttingen, 20–41 (1902).Google Scholar
  2. ——, Prinzipien der Dynamik des Elektrons,” Ann. d. Phys., 10, 105–179 (1903).Google Scholar
  3. ——, “Die Grundhypothesen der Elektronentheorie,” Phys. Zeit., 5, 576–579 (1904).Google Scholar
  4. ——, Theorie der Elektrizität (1st ed., Volume 2; Leipzig: Teubner, 1905; 2nd ed., Volume 2, 1908).Google Scholar
  5. Becker, R., & F. Sauter, Electromagnetic Fields and Interactions (2 vols.; New York: Blaisdell 1964).Google Scholar
  6. Bell, E. T., The Development of Mathematics (New York: McGraw-Hill 1945).Google Scholar
  7. Bestelmeyer, A., “Bemerkung zu der Abhandlung Herrn. A. H. Bucherer's ‘Die experimentelle Bestätigung des Relativitätsprinzips’,” Ann. d. Phys., 30, 166–174 (1909).Google Scholar
  8. Born, M., “Die träge Masse und das Relativitätsprinzip,” Ann. d. Phys., 28, 571–584 (1909).Google Scholar
  9. ——, Physics in My Generation (New York: Springer 1969).Google Scholar
  10. Bork, A. F., “The ‘Fitzgerald’ Contraction” Isis, 57, 199–207 (1966).Google Scholar
  11. Brush, S. G., “Note on the History of the Fitzgerald-Lorentz Contraction”, Isis, 58, 230–232 (1967).Google Scholar
  12. Bucherer, A. H., Mathematische Einführung in die Elektronentheorie (Leipzig: Teubner 1904).Google Scholar
  13. ——, “Messungen an Becquerelstrahlen. Die experimentelle Bestätigung der Lorentz-Einsteinschen Theorie,” Phys. Zeit., 9, 755–762 (1908).Google Scholar
  14. ——, “Die experimentelle Bestätigung des Relativitätsprinzips,” Ann. d. Phys., 28, 513–536 (1909).Google Scholar
  15. Crémieu, V., “Sur les expériences de M. Rowland relatives à l'effet magnétique de la ‘convection électrique’,” Comptes rendus de l'Académie des Sciences, 132, 797–800 (1901).Google Scholar
  16. —— & H. Pender, “On the Magnetic Effect of Electrical Convection,” Phil. Mag., 6, 442–464 (1903).Google Scholar
  17. —— & H. Pender, “Nouvelles recherches sur la convection électrique,” Comptes rendus de l'Académie des Sciences, 136, 548–550 (1903).Google Scholar
  18. —— & H. Pender, “Recherches Contradictoires sur l'effet Magnétique de la Convection Électrique.” Journal de physique théorique et appliquée, 2, 641–666 (1903).Google Scholar
  19. Dantzig, T., Henri Poincaré: Critic of Crisis (New York: Scribner 1954).Google Scholar
  20. de Broglie, L., New Perspectives in Physics, translated by A. J. Pomerans (New York: Basic Books 1962).Google Scholar
  21. Dirac, P. A. M., “Classical theory of radiating electrons,” Proc. Roy. Soc. (London) A 167, 148–169 (1938).Google Scholar
  22. Duhem, P., The Aim and Structure of Physical Theory, translated by P. P. Wiener (New York: Atheneum 1962).Google Scholar
  23. Einstein, A., “Zur Elektrodynamik bewegter Körper,” Ann. d. Phys., 17, 891–921 (1905). (Reprinted in The Principle of Relativity: A Collection of Original Memoirs on the Special and General Theory of Relativity by H. A. Lorentz, A. Einstein, H. Minkowski and H. Weyl, translated by W. Perrett & G. B. Jeffery (New York: Dover, n.d.), pp. 37–65. This reprint volume is referred to as P.R.C.)Google Scholar
  24. --, “Spielen Gravitationsfelder im Aufbau der materiellen Elementarteilchen eine wesentliche Rolle?” Sitzungsber. d. k. preuss. Akad. Wiss., 349–356 (1919). (Reprinted in P.R.C., pp. 191–198.)Google Scholar
  25. ——, The Meaning of Relativity, translated E. P. Adams (5th ed.; Princeton: Princeton University Press 1970).Google Scholar
  26. ——, “Autobiographical Notes,” in Albert Einstein: Philosopher-Scientist, P. A. Schilpp ed. (Evanston: The Library of Living Philosophers, 1949).Google Scholar
  27. Fermi, E., “Correzione di una grave discrepanza tra la teoria delle masse elettromagnetiche e la teoria della relativitá,” Rendiconti dei Lincei, 31, 184–187, 306–309 (1922). (Reprinted in Collected Papers: Vol. I, Italy 1921–1938, E. Segré ed. (2 vols.; Chicago: University of Chicago Press 1962), pp. 24–32.)Google Scholar
  28. Goldberg, S., “The Early Response to Einstein's Special Theory of Relativity, 1905–1911: A Case Study of National Differences,” Ph. D. Thesis (unpublished), Harvard University (1968).Google Scholar
  29. ——, “Henri Poincaré and Einstein's Theory of Relativity,” Am. J. Phys., 35, 934–944 (1967).Google Scholar
  30. ——, “Poincaré's Silence and Einstein's Relativity: The Role of Theory and Experiment in Poincaré's Physics,” Brit. J. Hist. Sci., 5, 73–84 (1970).Google Scholar
  31. ——, “The Abraham Theory of the Electron: The Symbiosis of Experiment and Theory,” Archive for History of Exact Sciences, 7, 7–25 (1970).Google Scholar
  32. ——, “The Lorentz Theory of Electrons and Einstein's Theory of Relativity,” Am. J. Phys., 37, 498–513 (1969).Google Scholar
  33. ——, “In Defense of the Ether: The British Response to Einstein's Special Theory of Relativity: 1905–1911,” Historical Studies in the Physical Sciences: Second Annual Volume 1970, R. McCormmach ed. (Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 1970), pp. 89–125.Google Scholar
  34. Goldstein, H., Classical Mechanics (Reading: Addison-Wesley, 1965).Google Scholar
  35. Guye, C. E., & Ch. Lavanchy, “Vérification expérimentale de la formula de Lorentz-Einstein par les rayons cathodiques de grande vitesse,” Arch. Sci. phys. nat., 41, 286, 353, 441 (1916).Google Scholar
  36. Heaviside, O., “On the electromagnetic effects due to the motion of electrification through a dielectric,” Phil. Mag., 27, 324–339 (1889).Google Scholar
  37. Heitler, W., The Quantum Theory of Radiation (London: Oxford University Press 1954).Google Scholar
  38. Hirosige, T., “Origins of Lorentz' Theory of Electrons and the Concept of the Electromagnetic Field,” Historical Studies in the Physical Sciences: Volume I, R. McCormmach ed. (Philadelphia; University of Pennsylvania Press 1969), pp. 151–209.Google Scholar
  39. ——, “Electrodynamics before the Theory of Relativity, 1890–1905,” Japanese Studies in the History of Science, 5, 1–49 (1966).Google Scholar
  40. ——, “Theory of Relativity and the Ether,” ibid.,, 7, 37–53 (1968).Google Scholar
  41. Holton, G., “On the Origins of the Special Theory of Relativity,” Am. J. Phys., 28, 627–636 (1960).Google Scholar
  42. ——, “On the Thematic Analysis of Science: The Case of Poincaré and Relativity,” Mélanges Alexandre Koyré (Paris: Hermann 1964), pp. 257–268.Google Scholar
  43. ——, “Einstein, Michelson and the ‘Crucial’ Experiment,” Isis, 60, 133–197 (1969).Google Scholar
  44. Jackson, J. D., Classical Electrodynamics (New York: Wiley 1962).Google Scholar
  45. Jammer, M., Concepts of Mass (Cambridge: Harvard University Press 1961).Google Scholar
  46. Kahan, T., “Sur les Origines de la théorie de la relativité restreinte,” Revue d'Histoire des Sciences, XIII, 159–165 (1959).Google Scholar
  47. Kaufmann, W., “Die magnetische und elektrische Ablenkbarkeit der Becquerelstrahlen und die scheinbare Masse der Elektronen,” Nachr. Ges. Wiss. Göttingen, 143–155 (1901).Google Scholar
  48. ——, “Die elektromagnetische Masse des Elektrons,” Phys. Zeit., 4, 54–57 (1902).Google Scholar
  49. --, “Über die ‘Elektromagnetische Masse’ der Elektronen,” Nachr. Ges. Wiss. Göttingen, 90–103 (1903).Google Scholar
  50. Keswani, G. H., “Origin and Concept of Relativity,” Brit. J. Phil. Sci., 15, 286–306; 16, 19–32 (1965).Google Scholar
  51. Kilmister, C. W. ed., Special Theory of Relativity (New York: Pergamon 1970).Google Scholar
  52. Klein, F., “Über die Integralform der Erhaltungssätze und die Theorie der räumlich geschlossenen Welt,” Nachr. Ges. Wiss. Göttingen, 394–423 (1918).Google Scholar
  53. Kwal, B., “Les expression et de l'impulsion du champ électromagnétique propre de l'électron en mouvement,” J. Phys. Rad., 193–194 (1949).Google Scholar
  54. Langevin, P., “La physique des électrons,” Revue générale des Sciences pures et appliquées, 16, 257–276 (1905).Google Scholar
  55. ——, “Sur l'origine des radiations et l'inertie électromagnétique,” J. de Physique, 4, 165 (1905). (Reprinted in Œuvres Scientifiques de Paul Langevin (Paris: C.N.R.S., 1950), pp. 313–348.)Google Scholar
  56. --, “L'inertie de l'énergie et ses conséquences,” in Œuvres Scientifique ..., pp. 397–426.Google Scholar
  57. Larmor, J., Aether and Matter (Cambridge: Cambridge U. Press 1900).Google Scholar
  58. Laue, M. von, Das Relativitätsprinzip (1st ed.; Braunschweig; Friedr. Vieweg und Sohn 1911: 2nd ed.: 1913).Google Scholar
  59. Lebon, Ernest, Savants du Jour: Henri Poincaré Biographie, Bibliographie analytique des écrits (2nd ed.; Paris: Gauthier-Villars 1912).Google Scholar
  60. Lewis, G. N., & R. C. Tolman, “The Principle of Relativity and Non-Newtonian Mechanics,” Phil. Mag., 18, 510–523 (1909).Google Scholar
  61. Lorentz, H. A., “La théorie électromagnétique de Maxwell et son application aux corps mouvants,” Arch. Néerl., 25, 363 (1892). (Reprinted in Collected Papers (9 vols.; The Hague: Nijhoff, 1935–1939), Vol. 2, 164–343.)Google Scholar
  62. ——, Versuch einer Theorie der elektrischen und optischen Erscheinungen in bewegten Körpern (Leiden: Brill 1895). (Reprinted in Collected Papers, Vol. 5, 1–137.)Google Scholar
  63. ——, “Théorie simplifiée des phénomènes électriques et optiques dans des corps en mouvement,” Versl. Kon. Akad. Wetensch. Amsterdam, 7, 507 (1899). (Reprinted in Collected Papers, Vol. 5, 139–155.)Google Scholar
  64. ——, “The Theory of Radiation and the Second Law of Thermodynamics, ibid.,, 9, 418 (1900). (Reprinted in Collected Papers, Vol. 6, 265–279.)Google Scholar
  65. ——, “Considérations sur la pesanteur,” Ibid.,, 8, 603 (1900). (Reprinted in Collected Papers, Vol. 5, 198–215.)Google Scholar
  66. ——, Boltzmann's and Wien's laws of Radiation, ibid.,, 9, 572 (1901). (Reprinted in Collected Papers, Vol. 6, 280–292.)Google Scholar
  67. ——, “Elektromagnetische Theorien physikalischer Erscheinungen,” Phys. Zeit. 1, 498, 514 (1900). (Reprinted in Collected Papers, Vol. 8, 333–352.)Google Scholar
  68. ——, “Über die scheinbare Masse der Ionen,” ibid., 2, 78 (1901). (Reprinted in Collected Papers, Vol. 3, 113–116.)Google Scholar
  69. ——, “Contributions to the Theory of Electrons,” Proc. Roy. Acad. Amsterdam, 5, 608 (1903). (Reprinted in Collected Papers, Vol. 3, 132–154.)Google Scholar
  70. ——, “Weiterbildung der Maxwellschen Theorie. Elektronentheorie,” Encykl. math. Wiss. Vol. V2, Art. 14 (Leipzig: Teubner 1904).Google Scholar
  71. ——, “Electromagnetic Phenomena in a System Moving with any Velocity Less than that of Light,” Proc. Roy. Acad. Amsterdam, 6, 809 (1904). (Reprinted in P.R.C., pp. 11–34.)Google Scholar
  72. ——, “Ergebnisse und Probleme der Elektrontheorie,” Elektotechn. Verein zu Berlin, 1904 (Berlin; Springer 1905). (Reprinted in Collected Papers, Vol. 8, 79–124.)Google Scholar
  73. ——, The Theory of Electrons (Leiden; Brill 1909; rev. ed., 1915; New York: Dover, 1952). This book is referred to as T.E. Google Scholar
  74. ——, “Alte und neue Fragen der Physik,” Phys. Zeit., 11, 1234–1257 (1910). (Reprinted in Collected Papers, Vol. 7, 205–257.)Google Scholar
  75. Lorentz, H. A., “Deux mémoires de Henri Poincaré sur la physique mathématique,” Acta mathematica, 38, 293 (1914). (Reprinted in Collected Papers, Vol. 7, 258–273.)Google Scholar
  76. ——, “The Connection Between Momentum and the Flow of Energy. Remarks Concering the Structure of Electrons and Atoms,” Versl. Kon. Akad. Wetensch. Amsterdam, 26, 981 (1917). (Reprinted in Collected Papers, Vol. 5, 314–329.)Google Scholar
  77. ——, Lectures on Theoretical Physics: Volume III, translated by L. Silberstein & A. P. H. Trivelli (London: MacMillan, 1931).Google Scholar
  78. McCormmach, R., “Henri Poincaré and Quantum Theory,” Isis, 58, 37–55 (1967).Google Scholar
  79. ——, “H. A. Lorentz and the Electromagnetic View of Nature,” Isis, 61, 459–497 (1970).Google Scholar
  80. ——, “Einstein, Lorentz and the Electron Theory,” Historical Studies in the Physical Sciences: Second Annual Volume 1970, R. McCormmach ed. (Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press 1970).Google Scholar
  81. Mie, G., “Grundlagen einer Theorie der Materie,” Ann. d. Phys., 37, 511–534: ibid., 39, 1–40 (1912); ibid., 40, 1–66 (1913).Google Scholar
  82. Miller, A. I., “Comment on: Poincaré's Rendiconti Paper on Relativity: Part I,” Am. J. Phys. 40, 923 (1972).Google Scholar
  83. Miller, J. D., “Rowland and the Nature of Electric Currents,” Isis, 63, 5–27 (1972).Google Scholar
  84. Minkowski, H., “Das Relativitätsprinzip,” lecture delivered before the Math. Ges. Göttingen on 5 Nov. 1907 published in Ann. d. Phys., 47, 927–938 (1915).Google Scholar
  85. --, “Die Grundgleichungen für die elektromagnetischen Vorgänge in bewegten Körpern,” Nachr. Ges. Wiss. Göttingen, 53–111 (1908).Google Scholar
  86. --, “Raum und Zeit,” lecture delivered at the Congress of Scientists, Cologne, 21 Sept. 1908 translated in P.R.C., pp. 75–91.Google Scholar
  87. Møller, C., The Theory of Relativity (London: Oxford University Press 1952).Google Scholar
  88. Neumann, G., “Die träge Masse schnell bewegter Elektronen,” Ann. d. Phys., 45, 529–579 (1914).Google Scholar
  89. Panofsky, W. K. H., & M. Phillips, Classical Electricity and Magnetism (Reading: Addison-Wesley 1961).Google Scholar
  90. Pauli, W., Theory of Relativity, translated by G. Field (New York: Pergamon, 1958). This is a translation of Pauli's article “Relativitätstheorie” in Encykl. math. Wiss. Vol. V 19 (Leipzig: Teubner 1921).Google Scholar
  91. Pender, H., “On the Magnetic Effect of Electrical Conduction,” Phil. Mag. 2, 179–208 (1901).Google Scholar
  92. Planck, M., “Das Prinzip der Relativität und die Grundgleichungen der Mechanik,” Verh. d. p. Ges., 6, 136–141 (1906).Google Scholar
  93. ——, “Zur Dynamik bewegter Systeme,” Sitzungsber. d. k. preuss. Akad. Wiss., 13, 542–570 (1907). This paper was also published in Ann. d. Phys. 26, 1–34 (1908).Google Scholar
  94. Poincaré, H., Science and Hypothesis (New York: Dover, 1952). This is a translation of Poincaré's La Science et l'Hypothèse (Paris: Ernest Flammarion 1902). This book is referred to as S.H. Google Scholar
  95. ——, The Value of Science, translated by George Bruce Halsted (New York: Dover 1958). This is a translation of Poincaré's La Valeur de la Science (Paris: Ernest Flammarion 1905). This book is referred to as V.S. Google Scholar
  96. --, Science and Method, translated by Francis Maitland (New York: Dover n.d.). This is a translation of Poincaré's Science et Méthode (Paris: Ernest Flammarion 1908). This book is referred to as S.M. Google Scholar
  97. ——, Mathematics and Science: Last Essays, translated by John W. Bolduc (New York: Dover 1963). This is a translation of Poincaré's Dernières Pensées (Paris, Ernest Flammarion 1913).Google Scholar
  98. ——, “Les Géométries non-euclidiennes,” Revue générale des Sciences pures et appliquées 2, 769–774 (1891).Google Scholar
  99. ——, “À propos de la théorie de M. Larmor,” L'Éclairage électrique, 3, 5–13, 289–295 (1895); ibid., 5, 5–14, 385–392 (1895). (Reprinted in Œuvres de Henri Poincaré (11 vols.; Paris: Gauthier-Villars 1934–1954), Vol. 9, pp. 369–426; this volume is referred to as Œuvres.)Google Scholar
  100. Poincaré, H., “La mesure du temps,” Rev. Mét. Mor., 6, 371–384 (1898); translated in V.S., pp. 26–36.Google Scholar
  101. ——, “Des fondements de la Géométrie: À propos d'un Livre de M. Russell,” Rev. Mét. Mor. 7, 251–279 (1899). This is a book review of Bertrand Russell's An Essay on the Foundations of Geometry (Cambridge: Cambridge U. Press 1897; New York: Dover 1952). Pages 265–269 of Poincaré's review constitute pages 75–79 of Chapter V, “Experiment and Geometry”, of Poincaré's S.H. Google Scholar
  102. ——, “Sur les rapports de la Physique expérimentale et de la Physique mathématique,” Rapports presentés au Congrès international de Physique réuni à Paris en 1900 (4 vols.; Paris: Gauthier-Villars 1900), Vol. 1, pp. 1–29; translated as Chapters IX and X, pp. 140–182 of S.H. Google Scholar
  103. ——, “Sur les principes de la Mécanique,” Bibliothèque du Congrès international de Philosophie tenu à Paris du 1er au 5 août 1900 (Paris: Colin 1901), pp. 457–494; an expanded version of this paper is presented on pp. 123–139 of S.H. Google Scholar
  104. ——, “La théorie de Lorentz et le principe de réaction,” Recueil de travaux offerts par les auteurs à H. A. Lorentz (The Hague: Nijhoff 1900), pp. 252–278. (Reprinted in Œuvres, pp. 464–488.)Google Scholar
  105. ——, “Sur la valeur objective de la Science,” Rev. Mét. Mor., 10, 263–293 (1902); an expanded version of this paper is presented in Part III, pp. 112–142 of V.S. Google Scholar
  106. --, “L'état actuel et l'avenir de la Physique mathématique” delivered on 24 September 1904 at the International Congress of Arts and Science at Saint Louis, Missouri and published in Bull. Sci. Mat., 28, 302–324; translated on pp. 91–111 of V.S. Google Scholar
  107. ——, “Sur la dynamique de l'électron,” Comptes rendus de l'Académie des Sciences, 140, 1504–1508 (1905). (Reprinted in Œuvres, pp. 489–493.)Google Scholar
  108. ——, “Sur la dynamique de l'électron,” Rend. del Circ. Mat. di Palermo, 21, 129–175 (1906). (Reprinted in Œuvres, pp. 494–550.)Google Scholar
  109. ——, “La dynamique de l'électron,” Revue générale des Sciences pures et appliquées, 19, 386–402 (1908). (Reprinted in Œuvres, pp. 551–586.) Excerpts from this paper have been translated in Book III, pp. 199–250 of S.M. Google Scholar
  110. ——, “La Mécanique nouvelle”, the last of Poincaré's six Wolfskehl lectures given at Göttingen in 1909 and published in Sechs Vorträge über ausgewählte Gegenstände aus der reinen Mathematik und mathematischen Physik (Leipzig: Teubner 1910).Google Scholar
  111. ——, “Les rapports de la matière et de l'éther” given on 11 April, 1912 before the French Society of Physics and published in Journal de Physique théorique et appliquée, 2, 347 (1912); translated in Chapter VII, pp. 89–101 of Last Essays ...;Google Scholar
  112. --, “L'Espace et le temps,” given on 4 May, 1912 at the University of London; translated in Chapter II, pp. 15–24 of Last Essays ...;Google Scholar
  113. --, “Sur la théorie des Quanta,” Comptes rendus de l'Académie des Sciences, 153, 1103–1108). (Reprinted in Œuvres, pp. 620–625.)Google Scholar
  114. ——, “Sur la théorie des Quanta,” Journal de Physique théorique et appliquée, 2, 5–34 (1912). (Reprinted in Œuvres, 625–653.)Google Scholar
  115. ——, La dynamique de l'électron (Paris: Dumas 1913).Google Scholar
  116. ——, La Mécanique nouvelle (Paris: Gauthier-Villars 1924).Google Scholar
  117. Reid, C., Hilbert (New York: Springer 1970).Google Scholar
  118. Richardson, O. W., The Electron Theory of Matter (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 1916).Google Scholar
  119. Rohrlich, F., “Self-Energy and Stability of the Classical Electron,” Am. J. Phys., 28, 639–643 (1960).Google Scholar
  120. ——, Classical Charged Particles (Reading: Addison-Wesley 1965).Google Scholar
  121. Russell, B., An Essay on the Foundations of Geometry (Cambridge: Cambridge U. Press 1897; New York: Dover Press 1952).Google Scholar
  122. ——, Mind, 14, 412–418 (1905). This is a review of Poincaré's book Science and Hypothesis.Google Scholar
  123. Schaffner, K., “The Lorentz Theory of Relativity,” Am. J. Phys., 37, 498–513 (1969).Google Scholar
  124. ——, Nineteenth-Century Aether Theories (New York: Pergamon 1972).Google Scholar
  125. Schwartz, H., Introduction to Special Relativity (New York: McGraw-Hill 1968).Google Scholar
  126. Schwartz, H., “Poincaré's Rendiconti Paper on Relativity, Part I,” Am. J. Phys. 39, 1287–1294 (1971); “II”, ibid., 40, 862–872 (1972).Google Scholar
  127. Schwarzschild, K., “Zur Elektrodynamik; I,” Nachr. Ges. Wiss. Göttingen, 125–131 (1903); “II,” ibid., 132–141 (1903); “III,” ibid., 245–278 (1903).Google Scholar
  128. Schweber, S., An Introduction to Relativistic Quantum Field Theory (New York: Row, Peterson and Company 1961).Google Scholar
  129. Scribner, C., “Henri Poincaré and the Principle of Relativity,” Am. J. Phys. 32, 672–678 (1964).Google Scholar
  130. Searle, F. C., “On the electromagnetic effects due to the motion of electrification through a dielectric,” Phil. Mag., 27, 324–339 (1889).Google Scholar
  131. Serrin, J., “Mathematical Principles of Classical Fluid Dynamics,” Handbuch der Physik: Volume VIII, Part I (Berlin-Göttingen-Heidelberg: Springer 1959).Google Scholar
  132. Thomson, J. J., “On the electric and magnetic effects produced by motion of electrified bodies,” Phil. Mag., 11, 229–249 (1881).Google Scholar
  133. ——, Notes on Recent Researches in Electricity and Magnetism (Oxford; Clarendon 1893).Google Scholar
  134. Volterra, V., Hadamard, J., Langevin, P., & Boutroux, P., Henri Poincaré (Paris: Librairie Félix Alcan 1914).Google Scholar
  135. Weyl, H., “Gravitation und Elektrizität,” Sitzungsber. d. k. preuss. Akad. Wiss., 465–480 (1918); translated in P.R.C., 201–216.Google Scholar
  136. ——, Space-Time-Matter, translated by Henry L. Brose (New York; Dover 1952).Google Scholar
  137. Whittaker, E. T., A History of the Theories of Aether and Electricity (2 vols. London: Nelson, Vol. 1, 1951, Vol. 2, 1953). A version of volume 1 with a similar title had appeared in 1910 (Dublin: Dublin University Press 1910).Google Scholar
  138. Wien, W., “Über die Möglichkeit einer elektromagnetischen Begründung der Mechanik,” Recueil de travaux offerts par les auteurs à H. A. Lorentz The Hague; Nijhoff 1900), pp. 96–107.Google Scholar
  139. Wilson, W., “The Mass of a Convected Field and Einstein's Mass-Energy Law,” Proc. Roy. Soc. (London), 734–740 (1936).Google Scholar
  140. Zahn, C. T., & A. A. Spees, “A critical analysis of the classical experiments on the variation of electron mass,” Phys. Rev., 53, 511–521 (1938).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1973

Authors and Affiliations

  • Arthur I. Miller
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of PhysicsHarvard UniversityUSA

Personalised recommendations