Springer Nature is making SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 research free. View research | View latest news | Sign up for updates

Expressions of corporate social responsibility in U.K. firms

  • 1054 Accesses

  • 68 Citations

Abstract

This study examines corporate publications of U.K. firms to investigate the nature of corporate social responsibility disclosure. Using a stakeholder approach to corporate social responsibility, our results suggest a hierarchical model of disclosure: from general rhetoric to specific endeavors to implementation and monitoring. Industry differences in attention to specific stakeholder groups are noted. These differences suggest the need to understand the effects on social responsibility disclosure of factors in a firm's immediate operating environment, such as the extent of government regulation and level of competitiveness in the industry.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Abbott, W. F. and R. J. Monsen: 1979, ‘On the Measurement of Corporate Social Responsibility: Self-Reported Disclosures as a Method of Measuring Corporate Social Involvement’, Academy of Management Journal 22(3), 501–515.

  2. Anderson, J. C. and A. W. Frankle: 1980, ‘Voluntary Social Reporting: An Iso-Beta Portfolio Analysis’, Accounting Review 55(3), 467–479.

  3. Bowman, E. H. and M. Haire: 1975, ‘A Strategic Posture Toward Corporate Social Responsibility’, California Management Review 18(2), 49–58.

  4. Brunsson, N.: 1989, The Organization of Hypocrisy (Wiley, Chichester).

  5. Business Week: 1992, ‘Did Sears Take Other Customers for a Ride?’, (August 3), 24–25.

  6. Business Week: 1993, ‘British Air: Not Cricket’, (January 25), 50–51.

  7. The Conference Board: 1987, Corporate Ethics, Research Report No. 900. New York.

  8. Cowen, S. S., L. B. Ferrei and L. D. Parker: 1987, ‘The Impact of Corporate Characteristics on Social Responsibility Disclosure: A Typology and Frequency-Based Analysis’, Accounting, Organizations and Society 12(2), 111–122.

  9. The Economist: ‘Lopez Elopes’, (March 20), 70.

  10. Ferrell, O. C. and S. J. Skinner: 1988, ‘Ethical Behavior and Bureaucratic Structure in Marketing Research Organizations’, Journal of Marketing Research 25(1), 103–109.

  11. Freeman, R. E.: 1984, Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ).

  12. Goodpaster, K. E.: 1991, ‘Business Ethics and Stakeholder Analysis’, Business Ethics Quarterly 1(1), 53–73.

  13. Guerard, J. B., Jr., A. S. Bean and B. K. Stone: 1990, ‘Goal Setting for Effective Corporate Planning’, Management Science 36(3), 359–367.

  14. Hitachi Research Institute: 1988, ‘Future Stage of Corporate Social Responsibility in the Era of Overseas Production’, Tokyo, Japan.

  15. Kabanoff, B.: 1992, ‘An Exploration of Organizational Culture in Australia (With a Closer Look at the Banking Sector)’, Australian Graduate School of Management, University of New South Wales.

  16. McConnell, D., J. A. Haslem and V. R. Gibson: 1986, ‘The President's Letter to Stockholders: A New Look’, Financial Analysts Journal (Sept.–Oct.), 66–70.

  17. Nicholson, N.: 1994, ‘Ethics in Organizations: A Framework for Theory and Research’, Journal of Business Ethics 13(8), 581–596.

  18. Nicholson, N. and D. C. Robertson: in press, ‘The Ethical Issue Emphasis of Companies: Content, Patterning, and Influences’, Human Relations.

  19. Paine, L. S.: 1994, ‘Managing for Organization Integrity’, Harvard Business Review (March–April), 106–117.

  20. Patten, D. M.: 1991, ‘Exposure, Legitimacy, and Social Disclosure’, Journal of Accounting and Public Policy 10(4), 297–308.

  21. Patten, D. M.: 1992, ‘Intra-Industry Environmental Disclosures in Response to the Alaskan Oil Spill: A Note on Legitimacy Theory’, Accounting Organizations and Society 17(5), 471–475.

  22. Pfeffer, J. and G. R. Salancik: 1978, The External Control of Organizations (Haper & Row, New York).

  23. Preston, L. E.: 1978, ‘Analyzing Corporate Social Performance: Methods and Results’, Journal of Contemporary Business (Winter), 130–150.

  24. Randall, D. M. and A. M. Gibson: 1990, ‘Methodology in Business Ethics Research: A Review and Critical Assessment’, Journal of Business Ethics 9(6), 457–471.

  25. Robertson, D. C. and B. B. Schlegelmilch: 1993, ‘Corporate Institutionalization of Ethics in the United States and Great Britain’, Journal of Business Ethics 12(4), 301–312.

  26. Rockness, J., P. Schlacter and H. O. Rockness: 1986, ‘Hazardous Waste Disposal, Corporate Disclosure, and Financial Performance in the Chemical Industry’, in M. Niemark, B. Merino and T. Tinker (eds.), Advances in Public Interest Accounting (JAI Press Inc., Greenwich), pp. 167–191.

  27. Ryan, L. V.: 1994, ‘Ethics Codes in British Companies’, Business Ethics: A European Review 3(1), 54–64.

  28. Schlegelmilch, B. B. and J. E. Houston: 1989, ‘Corporate Codes of Ethics in Large U.K. Companies: An Empirical Investigation of Use, Content and Attitudes’, European Journal of Marketing 23(6), 7–24.

  29. Sethi, S. P.: 1979, ‘A Conceptual Framework for Environmental Analysis of Social Issues and Evaluation of Business Response Patterns’, Academy of Management Review 4(1), 63–74.

  30. Smith, N. C.: 1990, Morality and the Market: Consumer Pressure for Corporate Accountability (Routledge, London and New York).

  31. Tinker, T. and M. Niemark: 1987, ‘The Role of Annual Reports in Gender and Class Contradictions at General Motors’, Accounting, Organizations and Society 12(1), 65–88.

  32. Trotman, K. T. and G. Bradley: 1981, ‘Associations Between Social Responsibility Disclosure and Characteristics of Companies’, Accounting, Organizations and Society 6(4), 355–362.

  33. Ullman, A. A.: 1985, ‘Data in Search of a Theory: A Critical Examination of the Relationships among Social Performance, Social Disclosure, and Economic Performance of U.S. Firms’, Academy of Management Review 10(3), 540–557.

  34. Vyakarnam, S.: 1992, ‘Social Responsibility in the U.K. Top 100 Companies’, Cranfield School of Management.

  35. Wartick, S. L. and P. L. Cochran: 1985, ‘The Evolution of the Corporate Social Performance Model’, Academy of Management Review 10(4), 758–769.

  36. Willie, E.: 1989, ‘Ethics at the Heart of Business: Report of a Study of Company Codes of Ethics’, Ashridge Management Research Group.

  37. Wiseman, J.: 1982, ‘An Evaluation of Environmental Disclosures Made in Corporate Annual Reports’, Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal 3(1), 38–53.

  38. Wood, D. J.: 1991a, ‘Corporate Social Performance Revisited’, Academy of Management Review 16(4), 691–718.

  39. Wood, D. J. 1991b, ‘Social Issues in Management: Theory and Research in Corporate Social Performance’, Journal of Management 17(2), 383–406.

Download references

Author information

Additional information

Diana C. Robertson is an Assistant Professor of Organisational Behaviour and Business Ethics at the London Business School. She was previously Assistant Professor of Legal Studies at The Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania. In 1990, she was awarded the University of Pennsylvania Provost's Award for Distinguished Teaching, and in 1992 she received a Wharton School Undergraduate Teaching Award. Her research interests include the impact of corporate policy, particularly codes of ethics, and compensation and control systems on employees' ethical behaviour, and the diffusion of ethical practices among corporations. She has published articles in the Sloan Management Review, Journal of Business Ethics, Organization Science, and Business Ethics Quarterly.

Professional Nigel Nicholson is Chairman of the Organisational Behaviour Group and Director of the Centre for Organisation Research at London Business School. Previously, he led investigations into Individual and Organisational Change at Sheffield University's Social & Applied Psychology Unit, and has also held visiting appointments at American, Canadian and German universities. He has published eight books and over 65 articles on a wide range of topics, and been honoured with an award from the Academy of Management for his contribution to theory.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Robertson, D.C., Nicholson, N. Expressions of corporate social responsibility in U.K. firms. J Bus Ethics 15, 1095–1106 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00412050

Download citation

Keywords

  • Economic Growth
  • Corporate Social Responsibility
  • Social Responsibility
  • Operating Environment
  • Government Regulation