Abstract
The equations governing heat and fluid flow in weld pools for the TIG fusion welding process are presented and this coupled system is solved numerically using finite differences. Electromagnetic forcing terms, buoyancy forces, shear forces on the pool surface due to the variation in surface tension with temperature and an additional uniform magnetic field applied normal to the workpiece are all included in our model and results are displayed indicating the relative importance of these four mechanisms.
Keywords
Magnetic Field Welding Surface Tension Fluid Flow Finite Difference
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
- 1.D. Rosenthal: The theory of moving sources of heat and its application to metal treatments. Trans. ASME. 68 (1946) 849–866.Google Scholar
- 2.H.S. Carslaw and J.C. Jaeger: Conduction of heat in solids, 2nd edn. Oxford: Clarendon Press (1959).Google Scholar
- 3.V. Kublanov and A. Erokhin: On metal motion in a stationary weld pool under the action of electromagnetic forces and gas flow velocity head in arc welding. Int. Inst. Weld. Doc. No. 212-318-74 (1974) 1–12.Google Scholar
- 4.I.E. Butsenieks, D.E. Peterson, V.I. Sharamkin and E.V. Shcherbinin: Magnetohydrodynamic fluid flows in a closed space with a nonuniform electric current. Magnetohydrodyn. 12 (1976) 70–74.Google Scholar
- 5.R.A. Woods and D.R. Milner: Motion in the weld pool in arc welding. Weld. J. 50 (1971); Res. Suppl. 163-s to 171-s.Google Scholar
- 6.S. Lundquist: On the hydromagnetic viscous flow generated by a diverging electric current. Ark. Fys. 40 (1969) 89–95.Google Scholar
- 7.J.A. Shercliff: Fluid motions due to an electric current source. J. Fluid Mech. 40 (1970) 241–250.Google Scholar
- 8.C. Sozou: On fluid motions induced by an electric current source. J. Fluid Mech. 46 (1971) 25–32.Google Scholar
- 9.C. Sozou and W.M. Pickering: Magnetohydrodynamic flow due to the discharge of an electric current in a hemispherical container. J. Fluid Mech. 73 (1976) 641–650.Google Scholar
- 10.J.G. Andrews and R.E. Craine: Fluid flow in a hemisphere induced by a distributed source of current. J. Fluid Mech. 84 (1978) 281–290.Google Scholar
- 11.D.R. Atthey: A mathematical model for fluid flow in a weld pool at high currents. J. Fluid Mech. 98 (1980) 787–801.Google Scholar
- 12.R.E. Craine and J.G. Andrews: The shape of the fusion boundary in an electromagnetically stirred weld pool. In: Proc. IUTAM Symposium on Metallurgical applications of Magnetohydrodynamics, The Metals Society (1984) pp. 301–313.Google Scholar
- 13.R.E. Craine and J.G. Andrews: The shape of the fusion boundary in an electromagnetically stirred weld pool. C.E.G.B. Lab. Note TPRD/M/1355/N84 (1984) 1–16.Google Scholar
- 14.G.M. Oreper and J. Szekely: Heat- and fluid-flow phenomena in weld pools. J. Fluid Mech. 147 (1984) 53–79.Google Scholar
- 15.Y. Fautrelle: Motion and pool profiles in arc welding. Actes du colloque módelisation et calcul en électromagnétisme et applications. A. Bossavit (1984) pp. 152–162.Google Scholar
- 16.C. Chan, J. Mazumder and M.M. Chen: A two-dimensional transient model for convection in laser melted pool. Met. Trans A 15 (1984) 2175–2184.Google Scholar
- 17.S. Kou and D.K. Sun: Fluid flow and weld penetration in stationary arc welds. Met. Trans A 16 (1985) 203–313.Google Scholar
- 18.S. Kou and Y.H. Wang: Weld pool convection and its effect. Weld. J. 65 (1986); Res. Suppl. 63-s to 70-s.Google Scholar
- 19.M.L. Lin and T.W. Eager: Influence of arc pressure on weld pool geometry. Weld. J. 64 (1985); Res. Suppl. 163-s to 169-s.Google Scholar
- 20.C.R. Heiple and J.R. Roper: Effect of Selenium on GTAW fusion zone geometry. Weld. J. 60 (1981); Res. Suppl. 143-s to 145-s.Google Scholar
- 21.C.R. Heiple and J.R. Roper: Mechanism for minor element effect on GTA fusion zone geometry. Weld. J. 61 (1982); Res. Suppl. 97-s to 102-s.Google Scholar
- 22.C.R. Heiple, J.R. Roper, R.T. Stagner and R.J. Aden: Surface active element effects on the shape of GTA, laser and electron beam welds. Weld. J. 62 (1983); Res. Suppl. 72-s to 77-s.Google Scholar
- 23.P. Burgardt and C.R. Heiple: Interaction between impurities and welding variables in determining GTA weld shape. Weld. J. 65 (1986); Res. Suppl. 150-s to 155-s.Google Scholar
- 24.K.C. Mills, B.J. Keene, R.F. Brooks and A. Olusanya: The surface tensions of 304 and 316 type stainless steels and their effects on weld penetration. In: Proc. Cent. Conf., Metallurgy Dept., Univ. of Strathclyde, June 1984, R1–R11.Google Scholar
- 25.B.J. Keene, K.C. Mills and R.F. Brooks: Surface properties of liquid metals and their effects on weldability. Mat. Sci. and Tech. 1 (1985) 568–571.Google Scholar
- 26.A.M. Boldyrev, N.P. Tolokonikov and E.B. Doroveev: Concerning the possibility of obtaining stable reversible motion of the molten metal in the weldpool with electromagnetic stirring. Weld. Prod. 22 (1975) 4–7.Google Scholar
- 27.R.A. Willgoss: Electromagnetic stirring: a potential aid to the close control of welding processes. C.E.G.B. Lab. Note RD/M/N1138 (1980) 1–12.Google Scholar
- 28.R.E. Craine and N.P. Weatherill: Fluid flow in a hemispherical container induced by a distributed source of current and a superimposed uniform magnetic field. J. Fluid Mech. 99 (1980) 1–11.Google Scholar
- 29.O.H. Nestor: High intensity and current density distributions at the anode of high current, inert gas arcs. J. Appl. Phys. 33 (1962) 1638–1648.Google Scholar
Copyright information
© Martinus Nijhoff Publishers 1987