Archive for History of Exact Sciences

, Volume 41, Issue 2, pp 139–156 | Cite as

Evaluations of the beta probability integral by bayes and price

Article

Summary

The contribution of Bayes to statistical inference has been much discussed, whereas his evaluations of the beta probability integral have received little attention, and Price's improvements of these results have never been analysed in detail. It is the purpose of the present paper to redress this state of affairs and to show that the Bayes-Price approximation to the two-sided beta probability integral is considerably better than the normal approximation, which became popular under the influence of Laplace, although it had been stated by Price.

The Bayes-Price results are obtained by approximating the skew beta density by a symmetric beta density times a factor tending to unity for n → ∞, the two functions having the same maximum and the same points of inflection. Since the symmetric beta density converges to the normal density, all the results of Laplace based on the normal distribution can be obtained as simple limits of the results of Bayes and Price. This fact was not observed either by Laplace or by Todhunter.

Keywords

Normal Distribution Normal Density Statistical Inference Normal Approximation Simple Limit 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bayes, T. (1764). An essay towards solving a problem in the doctrine of chances. Phil. Trans. 1763, 53, 370–418. Reprinted in facsimile in Two Papers by Bayes, ed. W. E. Deming, 1940. Reprinted in Biometrika, 1958, 45, 293–314, and in Pearson & Kendall, eds., 1970. Translated into German with a commentary by H. E. Timerding, 1908.Google Scholar
  2. Bayes, T. (1765). A demonstration of the second rule in the Essay towards the Solution of a Problem in the Doctrine of Chances, published in the Philosophical Transactions, Vol. LIII. Communicated by the Rev. Mr. Richard Price, in a letter to Mr. John Canton, M.A., F.R.S. Phil. Trans. 54, 1764, 296–325.Google Scholar
  3. Bernoulli, J. (1713). Ars Conjectandi. Thurnisius, Basilea. Reprinted by Editions Culture et Civilisation, Bruxelles, 1968, and in Die Werke von Jakob Bernoulli, Band 3, Birkhäuser, Basel, 1975.Google Scholar
  4. Dale, A. I. (1982). Bayes or Laplace? An examination of the origin and early applications of Bayes' theorem. Arch. Hist. Ex. Sci. 27, 23–47.Google Scholar
  5. Dale, A. I. (1986). A newly-discovered result of Thomas Bayes. Arch. Hist. Ex. Sci. 35, 101–113.Google Scholar
  6. Deming, W. E., ed. (1940). Facsimiles of two papers by Bayes. With commentaries by W. E. Deming and E. C. Molina. The Graduate School, The Department of Agriculture. Washington.Google Scholar
  7. Hald, A. (1990). A History of Probability and Statistics and Their Applications before 1750. Wiley, New York.Google Scholar
  8. Moivre, A. de (1738). The Doctrine of Chances. The second edition, fuller, clearer, and more correct than the first. Woodfall, London. Reprinted by Cass, London, 1967.Google Scholar
  9. Moivre, A. de (1756). The Doctrine of Chances. The third edition, fuller, clearer, and more correct than the former. Millar, London, Reprinted by Chelsea, New York, 1967.Google Scholar
  10. Laplace, P. S. de (1774). Mémoire sur la probabilité des causes par les événements. Mém. Acad. Roy. Sci. Paris 6, 621–656. Reprinted in Oeuvres 8, 1891, 27–65. Translated into English with an Introduction by S. M. Stigler in Statistical Science 1986, 1, 359–378.Google Scholar
  11. Pearson, E. S., & M. Kendall, eds. (1970). Studies in the History of Statistics and Probability 1. Griffin, London.Google Scholar
  12. Price, R. (1764). Introduction and Appendix to Bayes' Essay. Phil. Trans., 53, 370–375 and 404–418.Google Scholar
  13. Price, R. (1765). A demonstration of the second rule in Bayes' Essay. Phil. Trans. 1764 54, 296–297 and 310–325.Google Scholar
  14. Simpson, T. (1740). The Nature and Laws of Chance. The Whole after a new, general, and conspicuous Manner, and illustrated with a great Variety of Examples. Cave, London. Reprinted 1792.Google Scholar
  15. Stigler, S. M. (1986). The History of Statistics: The Measurement of Uncertainty before 1900. Harvard Univ. Press., Cambridge, Massachusetts.Google Scholar
  16. Timerding, H. E. (1908). Versuch zur Lösung eines Problems der Wahrscheinlichkeitsrechnung. Von Thomas Bayes. Ostwald's Klassiker der exacten Wissenschaften, Nr. 169. Engelmann, Leipzig.Google Scholar
  17. Todhunter, I. (1865). A History of the Mathematical Theory of Probability from the Time of Pascal to that of Laplace. Macmillan, London. Reprinted by Chelsea, New York, 1949.Google Scholar
  18. Wishart, J. (1927). On the approximate quadrature of certain skew curves, with an account of the researches of Thomas Bayes. Biometrika 19, 1–38, correction 19, 442.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1990

Authors and Affiliations

  • A. Hald
    • 1
  1. 1.VirumDenmark

Personalised recommendations