Journal of Business Ethics

, Volume 15, Issue 12, pp 1313–1320

The relationship of board member diversity to organizational performance

  • Julie I. Siciliano
Article

Abstract

Wider diversity in board member characteristics has been advocated as a means of improving organizational performance by providing boards with new insights and perspectives. With data from 240 YMCA organizations, a board diversity index was constructed and compared to multiple measures of board member diversity. Results revealed higher levels of social performance and fundraising results when board members had greater occupational diversity. Gender diversity compared favorably to the organization's level of social performance but a negative association surfaced for level of funds raised. The diversity in board member age groupings was linked to higher levels of donations.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Aldrich, H. E.: 1979, Organizations and Environments (Prentice-Hall, Inc., Englewood Cliffs, NJ).Google Scholar
  2. Babchuk, N., R. Marsey and C. W. Gordon: 1960, ‘Men and Women in Community Agencies: A Note on Power and Prestige’, American Sociological Review 25, 399–403.Google Scholar
  3. Baysinger, B. D. and H. N. Bulter: 1985, ‘Corporate Governance and the Board of Directors: Performance Effects of Changes in Board Composition’, Journal of Law, Economics and Organizations I(1), 101–124.Google Scholar
  4. Bere, J. F.: 1991, ‘The Director as Servant and Leader’, Directors and Boards 15(3), 7–8.Google Scholar
  5. Chaganti, R. S., V. Mahjan and S. Sharma: 1985, ‘Corporate Board Size, Composition and Corporate Failure in Retailing Industry’, Journal of Management Studies 22(4), 400–417.Google Scholar
  6. Cochran, P. L., R. A. Wood and T. B. Jones: 1985, ‘The Composition of Boards of Directors and Incidence of Golden Parachutes’, Academy of Management Journal 28, 664–671.Google Scholar
  7. Fryxell, G. E. and L. D. Lerner: 1989, ‘Contrasting Corporate Profiles: Women and Minority Representation in Top Management Positions’, Journal of Business Ethics 8, 341–352.Google Scholar
  8. Hiner, O. S.: 1967, ‘The Size of Company Boards’, Management International Review 7(4), 69–81.Google Scholar
  9. Houle, C. O.: 1990, ‘Who Should Be on Your Board?’, Nonprofit World 8(1), 33–35.Google Scholar
  10. Jones, M.: 1984, ‘Shaping Up the Y’, Toronto Business Journal.Google Scholar
  11. Kohn, P. F. and K. P. Mortimer: 1983, ‘Selecting Effective Trustees’, Change 15(5), 30–37.Google Scholar
  12. Kramer, R. M.: 1981, Voluntary Agencies in the Welfare State (University of California Press, Berkeley, CA).Google Scholar
  13. Mahoney, A. L.: 1991, ‘Technology, Governance and the Year 2000’, Association Management 43(5), 45–50.Google Scholar
  14. Middleton, M.: 1987, ‘Nonprofit Boards of Directors: Beyond the Governance Function’, in W. W. Powell (ed.) The Nonprofit Sector: A Research Handbook, 141–153.Google Scholar
  15. Nason, J.: 1977, Trustees and the Future of Foundations (Council on Foundations, New York, NY).Google Scholar
  16. Nonprofit Times: 1989, ‘YMCA Chief Defends Tax Exemption, Discusses New Activism’ Nov., 10–14.Google Scholar
  17. Oleck, H. L.: 1980, Nonprofit Corporations, Organizations and Associations 4th ed. (Prentice-Hall, Inc., Englewood Cliffs, NJ).Google Scholar
  18. Preffer, J.: 1972, ‘Size and Composition of Corporate Boards of Directors: The Organization and its Environment’, Administrative Science Quarterly 17, 218–228.Google Scholar
  19. Pfeffer, J.: 1973, ‘Size, Composition and Function of Hospital Boards of Directors: A Study of Organization Environment Linkage’, Administrative Science Quarterly 18, 349–363.Google Scholar
  20. Pfeffer, J. and G. R. Salancik: 1978, The External Control of Organizations: A Resource Dependence Perspective (Harper & Row, New York, NY).Google Scholar
  21. Pittsburgh v. Board of Property Assessment, 564 A2d 1026: 1989.Google Scholar
  22. Provan, K. G.: 1980, ‘Board Power and Organizational Effectiveness Among Human Service Agencies’, Academy of Management Journal 23, 221–236.Google Scholar
  23. Vance, S. C.: 1978, ‘Corporate Governance: Assessing Corporate Performance by Boardroom Attributes’ Journal of Business Research 6, 203–220.Google Scholar
  24. Widmer, C.: 1989, ‘Minority Participation on Boards of Directors of Human Service Agencies: Some Evidence and Suggestions, in R. D. Herman and J. Van Til (eds.), Nonprofit Boards of Directors: Analyses and Applications (Transaction Publishers, New Brunswick, NJ), pp. 139–151.Google Scholar
  25. Worthy, J. C. and R. P. Neuschel: 1984, Emerging Issues in Corporate Governance (Northwestern University Press, Evanston, IL).Google Scholar
  26. YMCA v. Department of Revenue, 784 P2d 1086: 1989.Google Scholar
  27. Zahra, S. A. and J. A. Pearce II.: 1989, ‘Boards of Directors and Corporate Financial Performance: A Review and Integrative Model’, Journal of Management 15(2), 291–334.Google Scholar
  28. Zahra, S. A. and W. W. Stanton: 1988, ‘The Implications of Board of Directors' Composition for Corporate Strategy and Performance’, International Journal of Management 5(2), 229–236.Google Scholar
  29. Zald, M. N.: 1967, ‘Urban Differentiation, Characteristics of Boards of Directors and Organizational Effectiveness’, American Journal of Sociology 73, 261–272.Google Scholar
  30. Zald, M. N.: 1969, ‘The Power and Function of Boards of Directors, A Theoretical Synthesis’, American Journal of Sociology 75, 97–111.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1996

Authors and Affiliations

  • Julie I. Siciliano
    • 1
  1. 1.School of BusinessWestern New England CollegeSpringFieldUSA

Personalised recommendations