Journal of Business Ethics

, Volume 15, Issue 6, pp 623–634 | Cite as

Can business ethics enhance corporate governance? Evidence from a survey of UK insurance executives

  • S. R. Diacon
  • C. T. Ennew
Article

Abstract

This paper seeks to explore the implementation of corporate ethical culture and policies as an adjunct to formal forms of corporate governance. The insurance industry utilises a variety of external governance structures, but is almost unique in that stock companies (which are exposed to an external market for corporate control) and mutual companies (which are owned by a subset of their customers) are in active competition. A questionnaire survey of senior executives in U.K. insurance companies was undertaken to explore the implementation of ethical policies and codes, to investigate ethical attitudes, and to analyze the extent to which these policies and attitudes varied among companies. The results suggest that ethical policies have a higher profile and ethical attitudes and behaviour are more positive in mutual as opposed to stock insurance companies. These findings support the contention that a strong corporate ethical culture may be utilised to enhance formal corporate governance instruments.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. ABI: 1994, Quarterly Statistics and Research Review, Association of British Insurers, No 1, April.Google Scholar
  2. Armitage, S. and P. Kirk: 1994, ‘The Performance of proprietary Compared with Mutual Life Offices’, The Service Industries Journal 14(2), 238–261.Google Scholar
  3. Boose, M.: 1993, ‘Investment Returns of Life Insurers: Tests of Agency Theory and its Alternatives’, Managerial Finance 10(6), 18–33.Google Scholar
  4. Cadogan, I. and R. Lewis: 1992, ‘Do Insurers Know Best? An Empirical Examination of the Extent that Insurers comply with their Statement of Practice and Whether They are a Satisfactory Substitute for Reform of the Law’, Anglo-American Law Review 21, 123–137.Google Scholar
  5. Cadbury, A.: 1992, (Chairman) Committee on the Financial Aspects of Corporate Governance: Report (Moorgate Place, London).Google Scholar
  6. Carter, R.: 1993, Study on the Use of the Word Mutual in the Insurance Industry (Lautro, London).Google Scholar
  7. Carter, R., B. Chiplin and M. Lewis: 1986, Personal Financial Markets (Philip Allan, Oxford).Google Scholar
  8. Diacon, S. R. and N. O'Sullivan: 1993, ‘Managerial Discretion and Performance in Large U.K. Life Insurance Groups’, paper presented at the 20th Seminar of the European Group of Risk and Insurance Economists, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.Google Scholar
  9. Ennew, C., A. McGregor and S. Diacon: 1993, ‘Ethical Aspects of the Marketing of Savings and Investment Products’, Business Ethics: A European Review 3, 123–129.Google Scholar
  10. Fields, J.: 1988, ‘Expense Preference Behavior in Mutual Life Insurers’, Journal of Financial Services Research 1, 113–129.Google Scholar
  11. Furnham, A. and B. Gunter: 1993, Corporate Assessment: Auditing a Company's Personality (Routledge, London).Google Scholar
  12. Graves, D.: 1972 ‘The Impact of Culture on Managerial Attitudes, Beliefs and Behaviour in England and France’, Journal of Management Studies 1, 40–56.Google Scholar
  13. Graves, D.: 1986, Corporate Culture — Diagnosis and Change: Auditing and Changing the Culture of Organizations (Frances Pinter, London).Google Scholar
  14. Hansmann, H.: 1985, ‘The Organisation of Insurance Companies: Mutual versus Stock’, Journal of Law, Economics and Organization 1, 125–153.Google Scholar
  15. Hausman,, D and M. McPherson: 1993, ‘Taking Ethics Seriously: Economics and Contemporary Moral Philosophy’, Journal of Economic Literature 31, 671–731.Google Scholar
  16. Ingham H. and S. Thompson: 1993, Profit Related Pay? An Investigation into CEO Compensation in the U.K. Insurance Industry, Paper presented at the U.K. Insurance Economists Conference (Nottingham).Google Scholar
  17. Johnston, E. A.: 1989, ‘The Appointed Actuary’, Journal of the Institute of Actuaries 116, 27–100.Google Scholar
  18. Kay, J.: 1991, ‘The Economics of Mutuality’, Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics 62(3), 309–318.Google Scholar
  19. Keasey, K and M. Wright: 1993, ‘Issues in Corporate Accountability and Governance: AN Editorial’, Accounting and Business Research 23(91a), 291–303.Google Scholar
  20. King, S.: 1988, ‘Insurance and Ethics: Boycott or Survival’, CPCU Journal, Dec., 230–235Google Scholar
  21. Knights, D. and H. Willmott: 1993, ‘It's a Very Foreign Discipline: The Genesis of Expenses Control in a Mutual Life Insurance Company’, British Journal of Management 4, 1–18.Google Scholar
  22. Kroll, M., P. Wright and P. Theerathorn.: 1993, ‘Whose Interests Do Hired Top Managers Pursue? An Examination of Select Mutual and Stock Life Insurers’, Journal of Business Research 26, 133–148.Google Scholar
  23. Lamm-Tennant, J. and L. Starks: 1993, ‘Stock Versus Mutual Ownership Structures: The Risk Implications’, Journal of Business 66, 29–46.Google Scholar
  24. Lewis, M. and B. Chiplin: 1986, ‘Characteristics of Markets for Personal Financial Services’, in Carter, Chiplin and Lewis (eds.), Personal, Financial Markets (Philip Allan, Oxford), pp. 27–47.Google Scholar
  25. Light, D.: 1992, ‘The Practice and Ethics of Risk-rated Health Insurance’, Journal of the American Medical Association 267 (May), 2503–2508.Google Scholar
  26. Mayers, D. and C. Smith: 1988, ‘Ownership Structure Across Lines of Property-Casualty Insurance’, Journal of Law and Economics 31, 351–378.Google Scholar
  27. Mayers, D. and C. Smith: 1992, ‘Executive Compensation in the Life Insurance Industry’, Journal of Business 65, 51–74.Google Scholar
  28. Murphy, P.: 1989, ‘Creating Ethical Corporate Structures’, Sloan Management Review 30(2), 81–87.Google Scholar
  29. Murphy, P., J. Smith and J. Daley: 1992, ‘Executive Attitudes, Organizations Size and Ethical Issues: Perspectives on a Service Industry’, Journal of Business Ethics 11, 11–19.Google Scholar
  30. Rechner, P., C. Sundaramurthy and D. Dalton: 1993, ‘Corporate Governance Predictors of Adoption of Anti-takeover Amendments: An Empirical Analysis’, Journal of Business Ethics 12, 371–378.Google Scholar
  31. Scott, M.: 1994, ‘Ethics Spotlight on Salesmen’, The Observer, London, 3 April, p. 14.Google Scholar
  32. Sinclair, A.: 1993, ‘Approaches to Organisational Culture and Ethics’, Journal of Business Ethics 12, 63–73.Google Scholar
  33. Smith, A.: 1776, The Wealth of Nations, Canaan Edition.Google Scholar
  34. Smith, B. and M. Stutzer: 1990, ‘Adverse Selection, Aggregate Uncertainty, and the Role for Mutual Insurance Contracts’, Journal of Business 63, 493–510.Google Scholar
  35. Stead, W., D. Worrell and J. Stead: 1990, ‘An Integrative Model for Understanding and Managing Ethical Behavior in Business Organizations’, Journal of Business Ethics 9, 233–242.Google Scholar
  36. Tricker, R.: 1984, Corporate Governance (Gower, Vermont, USA).Google Scholar
  37. Tyson, T.: 1992, ‘Does Believing that Everyone Else is Less Ethical Have an Impact on Work Behaviour?’, Journal of Business Ethics 11, 707–717.Google Scholar
  38. Walsh, J. and J. Seward: 1990, ‘On the Efficiency of Internal and External Corporate Control Mechanism’, Academy of Management Review 15, 421–458.Google Scholar
  39. Williamson, O.: 1964, The Economics of Discretionary Behavior: Managerial Objectives in a Theory of the Firm (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, USA).Google Scholar
  40. Williamson, O.: 1980, ‘The Organization of Work: A Comparative Institutional Assessment’, Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 1, 5–38.Google Scholar
  41. Williamson, O.: 1986, Economic Organization: Firms, Markets and Policy Control (Wheatsheaf, Brighton, U.K.).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1996

Authors and Affiliations

  • S. R. Diacon
    • 1
  • C. T. Ennew
    • 1
  1. 1.School of Management & FinanceUniversity of NottinghamUniversity ParkUnited Kingdom

Personalised recommendations