Commuting — a further stress factor for working people: evidence from the European Community
- 190 Downloads
- 22 Citations
Summary
About 100 million workers in the European Community commute to and from work daily. A review of the available data shows that commuting has increased in recent decades as rising car ownership has produced a more dispersed pattern of residential and job locations. In general, average commuting durations are falling, although average commuting distances are increasing as a result of faster commuting modes. However, the number of very long duration journeys have also increased, albeit from a small level. Up to now most research has focused on transport and land use issues, while very few studies have dealt with its impact on health, safety and social life of the workers. The available data indicate commuting to be a stress factor not only because of transport modes, but also by its interference with living and working conditions: namely, reduction of time available for discretionary leisure activities and increased absenteeism at workplace. Long-term effects on health have not been adequately investigated. Well integrated policies and strategies concerning the different aspects of this problem (transport, health, work organisation, residential planning) must be developed both at the local and international levels to facilitate adequate solutions for this stressful condition.
Key words
Commuting Stress AbsenteeismPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
- Buzzard RB, Liddel FDK (1963) Coal-miners attendance at work. Medical Research Memorandum 3, National Coal Board Medical Service, LondonGoogle Scholar
- Cawley ME (1980) Aspects of rural urban integration in Western Ireland. Irish Geography 13:20–32Google Scholar
- Chambers P (1981) Absenteeism — correcting some popular fallacies. Work Management 34/6:44–53Google Scholar
- Consumers Association (1981) Track record, LondonGoogle Scholar
- Cram J (1981) Motivational research into London bus travel. Cooper Research and Marketing, LondonGoogle Scholar
- Daniels PW (1980) Office location and the journey to work: a comparative study of five urban areas. Saxon House, FarnboroughGoogle Scholar
- Del Sole G (1987) Elementi conoscitivi sul pendolarismo nelle aree metropolitane in Italia. In: Reale L, Purkiss C, Balestra E, Di Martino V (eds) Commuting — Study of its impact on living and working conditions. Istituto Italiano Medicina Sociale and European Foundation for the Improvement of Living and Working Conditions Publ. Roma. Dublin, pp 291–301Google Scholar
- Department of Employment (1974) Absenteeism. Manpower paper, 4, HMSO, LondonGoogle Scholar
- Drewett R, Rossi PH, Horgher J, Matthiessen T (1984) Settlement structure and change. Urban Eur Ser 1, Gower, FarnboroughGoogle Scholar
- ECOTER (1983) La pendolarita' per motivi di lavoro in Italia: una rassegna di studi ed esperienze. ECOTER, RomaGoogle Scholar
- European Conference of Ministers of Transport (1986) Changing patterns of urban travel. ECTM ParisGoogle Scholar
- Fielding E (1985) Urban change in Western Europe. Report to the Transport and Road Research Laboratory, Crowthorne, UKGoogle Scholar
- Fisch T, Forest F, Biener K (1976) Auswirkungen des Arbeitsweges auf die Gesundheit, insbesondere den Blutdruck. Soz Präventivemed 21/5:188–191Google Scholar
- Fryer JF (1978) Travel to work in Greater London. GLC Research Memorandum, RM 551, Greater London Council, LondonGoogle Scholar
- Golembiewski RT, Prochl CW (1978) A survey of empirical literature on flexible working hours: character and consequences of a major innovation. Acad Managem Rev 3/7:837–853Google Scholar
- Goodwin PD (1976) Human effort and the value of time. J Transport Econ Pol 10/1:3–15Google Scholar
- Hoinville G, Johnson E (1972) Commuter preferences. Social and Community planning summary report P237, SCPR, LondonGoogle Scholar
- Jones RM (1971) Absenteeism. Department of Employment, Manpower Papers No. 4, HMSO, LondonGoogle Scholar
- Juettner E (1976) Der Einfluss der Entfernung zwischen Wohn- und Arbeitsort auf die Erkrankungshäufigkeit. Z Ges Hyg 22/8:615–619Google Scholar
- Liepmann KK (1944) The journey to work: its significance for industrial and community life. Kegan Paul, Trench, Trubner and Co, LondonGoogle Scholar
- Luculescu S, Telniceanu L, Bungiu I (1977) Enquete concernant la migration dans le milieu industriel et ses consequences sur l'absentéisme. Santé Publ (Bucharest) 20/2:189–199Google Scholar
- Lundberg U (1975) Urban commuting: congestion and catecholamine excretion. University of Stockholm, Dept. of Psychol Rep 453, StockholmGoogle Scholar
- Madden JF (1977) A spatial theory of sex discrimination. J Reg Sci 17:369–380Google Scholar
- Marotel G (1980) Travailler a Paris, vivre a ... 100 km. Les migrants SCNF en grande Region Parisienne. Report intermédiare, IRT, ArceuilGoogle Scholar
- Neuloh O, Beig K (1973) Raumordnung und Pendlerfrage, Ergebnisse einer sozio-ökologischen Untersuchung mit empirischen Fallstudien. Manuskript, SaarbrückenGoogle Scholar
- Pahl RE (1975) Whose city? Penguin Books, Harmondsworth, TRRL, Crowthorne, UKGoogle Scholar
- Palmer CD, Harrison GA, Hiorns RW (1980) Sleep patterns and life style in Oxforshire villages. J Biosocial Sci 12:437–467Google Scholar
- Papiernik E (1981) Naissances prematures: les transports collectifs responsables. Transport Environ Cir 44:22–26Google Scholar
- Pickup L (1985) Women's gender role and its influence on travel behaviour. Built Environ 10/1:61–68Google Scholar
- Pickup L, Di Martino V (1987) Commuting. The European dimension. European Foundation for the Improvement of Living and Working Conditions, DublinGoogle Scholar
- Pickup L, Town SW (1983) A European study of commuting and its consequences. Eur Found for the Improvement of Living and Working Conditions, DublinGoogle Scholar
- Reale L, Purkiss C, Balestra E, Di Martino V (eds) (1987) Commuting — Study of its impact on living and working conditions. Istituto Italiano Medicina Sociale and European Foundation for the Improvement of Living and Working Conditions Publ, Roma DublinGoogle Scholar
- Steers RM, Rhodes SR (1978) Major influences on employee attendance — a process model. J Appl Psychol 63/4:391–407Google Scholar
- Szalai A (1966) The multinational comparative time budget research project: a venture in international research cooperation. Am Behav Sci 10:1–31Google Scholar
- Taylor PJ (1968) Personal factors associated with sickness absence. Br J Ind Med 25:106–118Google Scholar
- Taylor PJ, Pocock SJ (1972) Commuter travel and sickness absence of London office workers. Br J Prev Soc Med 26:165–172Google Scholar
- Town SW (1980) The social distribution of mobility and travel patterns. Transport and Road Research Laboratory, report LR 948, TRRL, Crowthorne UKGoogle Scholar
- Vernon HM, Bedford T, Warner CG (1931) Two studies of absenteeism in coal mines. Rep of Ind Health Res Board 62, HMSO, LondonGoogle Scholar
- Vidakovic V (1980) Mens-Tijd-Ruimte. Dienst Ruimtelijke Ordening, AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
- Vidakovic V (1983) Home-work relations and trip patterns. Verkeerschunde 34/1:19–25Google Scholar
- Wyatt S, Marriott R, Hughes DER (1943) A study of absenteeism among women. Rep Ind Health Res Bd, Emergency Rep No. 4, HMSO, LondonGoogle Scholar
- Wigan MR, Morris JM (1981) The transport implications of activity and time budget constraints. ARR Research Report 93, Australian Road Research Board, CanberraGoogle Scholar
- Young M, Willmott P (1968) Family and kinship in East London. Penguin, Harmonsworth, UKGoogle Scholar