Commuting — a further stress factor for working people: evidence from the European Community

I. A review
  • Giovanni Costal
  • Laurie Pickup
  • Vittorio Di Martino
Original Articles

Summary

About 100 million workers in the European Community commute to and from work daily. A review of the available data shows that commuting has increased in recent decades as rising car ownership has produced a more dispersed pattern of residential and job locations. In general, average commuting durations are falling, although average commuting distances are increasing as a result of faster commuting modes. However, the number of very long duration journeys have also increased, albeit from a small level. Up to now most research has focused on transport and land use issues, while very few studies have dealt with its impact on health, safety and social life of the workers. The available data indicate commuting to be a stress factor not only because of transport modes, but also by its interference with living and working conditions: namely, reduction of time available for discretionary leisure activities and increased absenteeism at workplace. Long-term effects on health have not been adequately investigated. Well integrated policies and strategies concerning the different aspects of this problem (transport, health, work organisation, residential planning) must be developed both at the local and international levels to facilitate adequate solutions for this stressful condition.

Key words

Commuting Stress Absenteeism 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Buzzard RB, Liddel FDK (1963) Coal-miners attendance at work. Medical Research Memorandum 3, National Coal Board Medical Service, LondonGoogle Scholar
  2. Cawley ME (1980) Aspects of rural urban integration in Western Ireland. Irish Geography 13:20–32Google Scholar
  3. Chambers P (1981) Absenteeism — correcting some popular fallacies. Work Management 34/6:44–53Google Scholar
  4. Consumers Association (1981) Track record, LondonGoogle Scholar
  5. Cram J (1981) Motivational research into London bus travel. Cooper Research and Marketing, LondonGoogle Scholar
  6. Daniels PW (1980) Office location and the journey to work: a comparative study of five urban areas. Saxon House, FarnboroughGoogle Scholar
  7. Del Sole G (1987) Elementi conoscitivi sul pendolarismo nelle aree metropolitane in Italia. In: Reale L, Purkiss C, Balestra E, Di Martino V (eds) Commuting — Study of its impact on living and working conditions. Istituto Italiano Medicina Sociale and European Foundation for the Improvement of Living and Working Conditions Publ. Roma. Dublin, pp 291–301Google Scholar
  8. Department of Employment (1974) Absenteeism. Manpower paper, 4, HMSO, LondonGoogle Scholar
  9. Drewett R, Rossi PH, Horgher J, Matthiessen T (1984) Settlement structure and change. Urban Eur Ser 1, Gower, FarnboroughGoogle Scholar
  10. ECOTER (1983) La pendolarita' per motivi di lavoro in Italia: una rassegna di studi ed esperienze. ECOTER, RomaGoogle Scholar
  11. European Conference of Ministers of Transport (1986) Changing patterns of urban travel. ECTM ParisGoogle Scholar
  12. Fielding E (1985) Urban change in Western Europe. Report to the Transport and Road Research Laboratory, Crowthorne, UKGoogle Scholar
  13. Fisch T, Forest F, Biener K (1976) Auswirkungen des Arbeitsweges auf die Gesundheit, insbesondere den Blutdruck. Soz Präventivemed 21/5:188–191Google Scholar
  14. Fryer JF (1978) Travel to work in Greater London. GLC Research Memorandum, RM 551, Greater London Council, LondonGoogle Scholar
  15. Golembiewski RT, Prochl CW (1978) A survey of empirical literature on flexible working hours: character and consequences of a major innovation. Acad Managem Rev 3/7:837–853Google Scholar
  16. Goodwin PD (1976) Human effort and the value of time. J Transport Econ Pol 10/1:3–15Google Scholar
  17. Hoinville G, Johnson E (1972) Commuter preferences. Social and Community planning summary report P237, SCPR, LondonGoogle Scholar
  18. Jones RM (1971) Absenteeism. Department of Employment, Manpower Papers No. 4, HMSO, LondonGoogle Scholar
  19. Juettner E (1976) Der Einfluss der Entfernung zwischen Wohn- und Arbeitsort auf die Erkrankungshäufigkeit. Z Ges Hyg 22/8:615–619Google Scholar
  20. Liepmann KK (1944) The journey to work: its significance for industrial and community life. Kegan Paul, Trench, Trubner and Co, LondonGoogle Scholar
  21. Luculescu S, Telniceanu L, Bungiu I (1977) Enquete concernant la migration dans le milieu industriel et ses consequences sur l'absentéisme. Santé Publ (Bucharest) 20/2:189–199Google Scholar
  22. Lundberg U (1975) Urban commuting: congestion and catecholamine excretion. University of Stockholm, Dept. of Psychol Rep 453, StockholmGoogle Scholar
  23. Madden JF (1977) A spatial theory of sex discrimination. J Reg Sci 17:369–380Google Scholar
  24. Marotel G (1980) Travailler a Paris, vivre a ... 100 km. Les migrants SCNF en grande Region Parisienne. Report intermédiare, IRT, ArceuilGoogle Scholar
  25. Neuloh O, Beig K (1973) Raumordnung und Pendlerfrage, Ergebnisse einer sozio-ökologischen Untersuchung mit empirischen Fallstudien. Manuskript, SaarbrückenGoogle Scholar
  26. Pahl RE (1975) Whose city? Penguin Books, Harmondsworth, TRRL, Crowthorne, UKGoogle Scholar
  27. Palmer CD, Harrison GA, Hiorns RW (1980) Sleep patterns and life style in Oxforshire villages. J Biosocial Sci 12:437–467Google Scholar
  28. Papiernik E (1981) Naissances prematures: les transports collectifs responsables. Transport Environ Cir 44:22–26Google Scholar
  29. Pickup L (1985) Women's gender role and its influence on travel behaviour. Built Environ 10/1:61–68Google Scholar
  30. Pickup L, Di Martino V (1987) Commuting. The European dimension. European Foundation for the Improvement of Living and Working Conditions, DublinGoogle Scholar
  31. Pickup L, Town SW (1983) A European study of commuting and its consequences. Eur Found for the Improvement of Living and Working Conditions, DublinGoogle Scholar
  32. Reale L, Purkiss C, Balestra E, Di Martino V (eds) (1987) Commuting — Study of its impact on living and working conditions. Istituto Italiano Medicina Sociale and European Foundation for the Improvement of Living and Working Conditions Publ, Roma DublinGoogle Scholar
  33. Steers RM, Rhodes SR (1978) Major influences on employee attendance — a process model. J Appl Psychol 63/4:391–407Google Scholar
  34. Szalai A (1966) The multinational comparative time budget research project: a venture in international research cooperation. Am Behav Sci 10:1–31Google Scholar
  35. Taylor PJ (1968) Personal factors associated with sickness absence. Br J Ind Med 25:106–118Google Scholar
  36. Taylor PJ, Pocock SJ (1972) Commuter travel and sickness absence of London office workers. Br J Prev Soc Med 26:165–172Google Scholar
  37. Town SW (1980) The social distribution of mobility and travel patterns. Transport and Road Research Laboratory, report LR 948, TRRL, Crowthorne UKGoogle Scholar
  38. Vernon HM, Bedford T, Warner CG (1931) Two studies of absenteeism in coal mines. Rep of Ind Health Res Board 62, HMSO, LondonGoogle Scholar
  39. Vidakovic V (1980) Mens-Tijd-Ruimte. Dienst Ruimtelijke Ordening, AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
  40. Vidakovic V (1983) Home-work relations and trip patterns. Verkeerschunde 34/1:19–25Google Scholar
  41. Wyatt S, Marriott R, Hughes DER (1943) A study of absenteeism among women. Rep Ind Health Res Bd, Emergency Rep No. 4, HMSO, LondonGoogle Scholar
  42. Wigan MR, Morris JM (1981) The transport implications of activity and time budget constraints. ARR Research Report 93, Australian Road Research Board, CanberraGoogle Scholar
  43. Young M, Willmott P (1968) Family and kinship in East London. Penguin, Harmonsworth, UKGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1988

Authors and Affiliations

  • Giovanni Costal
    • 1
  • Laurie Pickup
    • 2
  • Vittorio Di Martino
    • 3
  1. 1.Institute of Occupational MedicineUniversity of Verona, Policlinic HospitalVeronaItaly
  2. 2.Transport Studies UnitOxford UniversityUK
  3. 3.European Foundation for the Improvement of Living and Working ConditionsDublinIreland

Personalised recommendations