, Volume 70, Issue 6, pp 272–281 | Cite as

A new solution to the problem of the subjective vertical

  • Horst Mittelstaedt


Based on new evidence and the extensive literature, this report develops an outline of a comprehensive theory of the subjective vertical (SV) in humans. Traditionally the large deviations of the SV from veridicality are attributed to a failure on the part of the gravity systems to correctly perform the necessary coordinate transformation on the visual system. It is experimentally demonstrated, however, that in the control of posture the gravity systems do in fact work close to perfection in positions where the deviations of the SV from the physical vertical are almost largest. Since also the visual system is known to process angular information veridically in the respective range, the intervention of a third agent is suggested, namely a tendency to shift the SV towards the person's own longitudinal axis (“idiotropic vector”). The predictions of the theory are confirmed experimentally, proving that not only the visual but also the haptic zenith is shifted towards the long axis by strongly correlated amounts, when the head is pitched backwards. The theory is also shown to be compatible with, or amenable to typical properties of the SV response characteristic [1], quantitative neurological data on primate gravity receptors [2], a theory of postural control worked out earlier [3], and a particular type of non-linear interaction also found in other orientation systems [4].


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Schöne, H., Udo de Haes, H.A., in: Biokybernetik, Band III, p. 172 (Drischesl, H., Tiedt, N., eds.). Jena: Fischer 1971Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Fernandez, C., Goldberg, J.M.: J. Neurophysiol. 39, 970 (1976)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Mittelstaedt, H.: Fortschr. Zool. 23, 128 (1975)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Mittelstaedt, H., in: Biophysik, p. 822 (Hoppe, W., et al., eds.). Berlin-Heidelberg-New York: Springer 1982Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Schmitz, H.: System der Philosophie, Band III/l: Der Raum. Bonn: Bouvier 1974Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Bischof, N., in: Handbook of Sensory Physiology, p. 155 (Autrum, H., et al., eds.). Berlin-Heidelberg-New York: Springer 1974Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Mittelstaedt, H., in: Vorträge der Erlanger Physiologentagung 1970, p. 162–171 (Keidel, W.D., Plattig, K.H., eds.). Berlin-Heidelberg-New York: Springer 1971Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Aubert, H.: Virchows Arch. 20, 381 (1861)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Correia, M.J., et al.: Acta Oto-laryng. Suppl. 230, 3 (1968)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Ormsby, C.C., Young, L.R.: Aviat. Space Environ. Med. 47, 159 (1976)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Schöne, H.: Orientierung im Raum. Stuttgart: Wiss. Verlagsges. 1980Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Howard, I.P.: Human Visual Orientation. New York-Brisbane-Toronto: Wiley 1982Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Reese, E.P.: Summary report No. SDC 131-1-5. Psychophysical Res. Unit. Massachusetts: Mount Holyoke College 1953Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Muller, P.E., et al.: U.S.A.F. WADC. Techn. Rep. No. 55–375 (1955)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Keene, G.C.: J. Gen. Psychol. 69, 37 (1963)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Lechner-Steinleitner, S.: Psychol. Res. 40, 65 (1978)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Lechner-Steinleitner, S., Schöne, H.: ibid. 41, 305 (1980)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Udo de Haes, H.A.: Percept. Psychophys. 8, 137 (1970)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Udo de Haes, H.A., Schoene, H.: Acta Oto-laryng. 69, 25 (1970)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Schöne, H., Parker, D.: Naturwissenschaften 54, 288 (1967)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Schöne, H., Parker, D.E., Mortag, H.G.: ibid. 54, 288 (1967)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Mittelstaedt, H.: Symp. Soc. Exp. Biol. 18, 365 (1964)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Edrich, W.: Anim. Behav. 25, 342 (1977)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Mittelstaedt, H., in: Kybernetik 1977, p. 144 (Hauske, G., Butenandt, E., eds.). München-Wien: Oldenbourg 1978Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Mittelstaedt, H., in: Multimodal Convergences in Sensory Systems, Sonderband Fortschr. Zool. (Horn, E., ed.). Stuttgart: Fischer (in press)Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Luneburg, R.K.: Mathematical Analysis of Binocular Vision. Princeton Univ. Press 1948Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Luneburg, R.K., in: Studies and Essays, Courant Anniversary Volume. New York: Interscience 1948Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Mittelstaedt, H., in: Behavioural Physiology and Neuroethology. Roots and growing points (Huber, F., Markl, H., eds.). Berlin-Heidelberg-New York: Springer (in press)Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Dichgans, J.M., Diener, H.C., Brandt, Th.: Acta Otolaryng. 78, 391 (1974)Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Young, L.R., Oman, C.M., Dichgans, J.M.: Aviat. Space Env. Med. 46 (3), 264 (1975)Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Graybiel, A., Kellogg, R.S.: Aerospace Med. 38, 1099 (1967)Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Yakovleva, I.Ya., et al.: Kosm. Biol. Aviakosm. Med. 1, 19. English translation in: Space Biol. Aerospace Med. New York (1981)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1983

Authors and Affiliations

  • Horst Mittelstaedt
    • 1
  1. 1.Max-Planck-Institut für VerhaltensphysiologieSeewiesen

Personalised recommendations