Advertisement

Prevalence of dry eye in Japanese eye centers

  • T. Hikichi
  • A. Yoshida
  • Y. Fukui
  • T. Hamano
  • M. Ri
  • K. Araki
  • K. Horimoto
  • E. Takamura
  • K. Kitagawa
  • M. Oyama
  • Y. Danjo
  • S. Kondo
  • H. Fujishima
  • I. Toda
  • K. Tsubota
Clinical Investigation

Abstract

• Background: The purpose of the investigation was to ascertain the prevalence of dry eye in new outpatients. • Methods: A total of 2127 consecutive new outpatients seen in eight Japanese centers from April 1992 to January 1993 underwent comprehensive examinations, including double vital staining and measurement of tear film break-up time, basal tear secretion, and tear clearance. Dry eye was diagnosed if patients had abnormalities of both the tear film and the ocular surface. • Results: Three hundred fifty-nine patients (17%) had dry eye. There was no seasonal pattern for dry eye. The condition was significantly more common in Tokyo than in suburban areas (P < 0.01). The prevalence of dry eye in visual display terminal (VDT) users and contact lens (CL) wearers was significantly higher than in non-VDT users and non-CL wearers (P < 0.05 and P < 0.02, respectively). • Conclusion: Our findings suggest that dry eye is one of the most common ocular disorders encountered by physicians. Furthermore, if patients use VDTs or wear CLs, the likelihood of dry eye occurring is higher.

Keywords

Public Health Seasonal Pattern Contact Lens Visual Display Ocular Surface 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Bloch KJ, Buchanan WW, Whol ML, Bunin JJ (1965) Sjögren's syndrome: a clinical, pathological, and serological study of sixty-two cases. Medicine (Baltimore) 44:187–231Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Brennan NA, Efron N (1986) Symptomatology of HEMA contact lens wear. Optom Vis Sci 66:834–838Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bron AJ (1985) Duke-Elder Lecture. Prospects for the dry eye. Trans Ophthalmol Soc UK 104:801–826PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Farris RL (1986) The dry eye: its mechanisms and therapy, with evidence that contact lens is a cause. CLAO J 12:234–246PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Farris RL (1987) Contact lens wear in the management of the dry eye. Int Ophthalmol Clin 27:54–60PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Foreman J (1991) San Francisco passes ordinance regulating VDT use. Arch Ophthalmol 109:477PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Gilbard JP, Gray KL, Rossi SR (1986) A proposed mechanism for increased tear-film osmolarity in contact lens wearers. Am J Ophthalmol 102:505–507PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Golding TR, Efron N, Brennant NA (1990) Soft lens lubricants and prelens tear film stability. Optom Vis Sci 67:461–465PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Hamano H, Hoary M, Mitsunaga S, Kojima S, Maeshima J (1982) Tear secretion test (preliminary report). Jpn J Clin Ophthalmol 124:103–107Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Holly FJ, Lemp MA (1977) Tear physiology and dry eyes. Surv Ophthalmol 22:69–87CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Leibowitz HM, Krueger DE, Maunder LR, Milton RC, Kini MM, Kahn HA, Nickerson RJ, Pool J, Colton TL, Ganley JP, Loewenstein IJ, Dawber TR (1980) The Framingham Eye Study monograph. Surv Ophthalmol 24:350–365CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Lemp MA (1987) Tear film: new concepts and implications for the management of the dry eye. Trans New Orleans Acad Ophthalmol 53–64Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Lemp MA, Chacko B (1991) Diagnosis and treatment of tear deficiencies. In: Tasman W (ed) Clinical ophthalmology, vol 4. Lippincott, Philadelphia, pp 1–13Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Ono M, Yoshino K, Yamada K, Tsubota K (1991) Tear fluid clearance test. Jpn J Clin Ophthalmol 45:1143–1147Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Rolando M, Refojo MF, Kenyon KR (1983) Increased tear evaporation in eyes with keratoconjunctivitis sicca. Arch Ophthalmol 101:557–558PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Toda I, Tsubota K (1993) Practical double vital staining for ocular surface evaluation. Cornea 12:366–367PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Tsubota K (1989) The effect of wearing spectacles on the humidity of the eye. Am J Ophthalmol 108:92–93PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Tsubota K, Nakamori K (1993) Dry eyes and video display terminals. N Engl J Med 328:584CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    van Bijsterveld OP (1969) Diagnostic tests in the sicca syndrome. Arch Ophthalmol 82:10–14PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1995

Authors and Affiliations

  • T. Hikichi
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
  • A. Yoshida
    • 1
  • Y. Fukui
    • 3
  • T. Hamano
    • 4
  • M. Ri
    • 4
  • K. Araki
    • 4
  • K. Horimoto
    • 4
  • E. Takamura
    • 5
  • K. Kitagawa
    • 6
  • M. Oyama
    • 6
  • Y. Danjo
    • 7
  • S. Kondo
    • 8
  • H. Fujishima
    • 9
    • 10
  • I. Toda
    • 9
  • K. Tsubota
    • 9
    • 10
  1. 1.Department of OphthalmologyAsahikawa Medical CollegeAsahikawaJapan
  2. 2.Schepens Retina AssociatesBostonUSA
  3. 3.Department of OphthalmologyKushiro Red Cross HospitalKushiroJapan
  4. 4.Department of OphthalmologyOsaka Seamen's Insurance HospitalOsakaJapan
  5. 5.Department of OphthalmologyTokyo Women's Medical CollegeTokyoJapan
  6. 6.Department of OphthalmologyKanazawa Medical CollegeKanazawaJapan
  7. 7.Department of OphthalmologyOsaka National HospitalOsakaJapan
  8. 8.Department of OphthalmologyKumamoto University Faculty of MedicineKumamotoJapan
  9. 9.Department of Ophthalmology, Tokyo Dental CollegeIchikawa General HospitalIchikawaJapan
  10. 10.Department of OphthalmologyKameda General Hospital Makuhari ClinicChibaJapan

Personalised recommendations