Familial factors determine the development of diabetic nephropathy in patients with IDDM
- 161 Downloads
To evaluate familial factors in the development of diabetic nephropathy in insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (IDDM) we examined concordance for diabetic nephropathy in families with multiple IDDM siblings. Families (n=110) were identified through Joslin Clinic patients (probands) with a sibling having IDDM. To be eligible, the probands' and siblings' ages at IDDM diagnosis were less than 21 years, and IDDM duration was more than 15 years for probands and more than 10 years for siblings. Mean post-pubertal diabetes duration was 23 years for probands (n=110) and 21 years for siblings (n=125). Nephropathy history was determined by medical record review for deceased patients and those with persistent proteinuria or end-stage renal disease to ascertain the date of onset of persistent proteinuria. For patients without documented nephropathy, the albumin/creatinine ratio was measured in multiple urine samples. The cumulative incidence of persistent proteinuria according to post-pubertal duration of IDDM was determined by life-table analysis. For probands and siblings combined, the cumulative incidence of advanced diabetic nephropathy after 30 years of IDDM was 35%, but the risk in siblings varied according to the proband's renal status. The cumulative risk in siblings after 25 years of IDDM (post-puberty) was 71.5% if the proband had persistent proteinuria but only 25.4% if the proband did not (p<0.001). A difference of nearly 50% in the risk to IDDM siblings, depending upon the IDDM proband's renal status, is consistent with a major gene effect that predisposes an individual with IDDM to develop advanced diabetic nephropathy.
KeywordsInsulin-dependent diabetes mellitus genetics of diabetic nephropathy family studies
Insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 3.Krolewski AS, Warram JH, Rand LI, Kahn CR (1987) Epidemiologic approach to studies on etiology of IDDM and its complications. N Engl J Med 317: 140–145Google Scholar
- 6.Khoury MJ, Flanders WD, Greenland S, Adams MJ (1989) On the measurement of susceptibility in epidemiologic studies. Am J Epidemiology 129: 183–190Google Scholar
- 7.Risch N (1990) Linkage strategies for genetically complex traits. II. The power of affected relative pairs. Am J Hum Gen 46: 229–241Google Scholar
- 11.Rothman KJ (1986) Modern epidemiology. Little Brown & Company, BostonGoogle Scholar
- 12.SAS Institute Inc. (1985) SAS/STATTM Guide for Personal Computers. Version 6 Edition. SAS Institute, Cary, NCGoogle Scholar
- 17.Krolewski AS, Warram JH, Christlieb AR (1994) Hypercholesterolemia — a determinant of renal function loss and deaths in IDDM patients with nephropathy. Kidney Int 45:S125-S131Google Scholar
- 18.Quinn M, Krolewski AS (1995) Familial clustering of glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1) in IDDM siblings. Diabetes 44[Suppl 1]:787A (abstract)Google Scholar
- 19.Ward R (1990) Familial aggregation and genetic epidemiology of blood pressure. In: Laragh JH, Brenner BM (eds) Hypertension: pathophysiology, diagnosis and management, vol 1. Raven Press, New York, pp 81–100Google Scholar
- 23.Peto J (1980) Genetic predisposition to cancer. In: Cairns J, Lyon JL, Skolnick M (eds) Cancer incidence in defined populations. Banbury Report No. 4; Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, NY, pp 203–213Google Scholar