Psychopharmacologia

, Volume 14, Issue 2, pp 115–123 | Cite as

A comparison of LSD-25 with (−)-Δ9-trans-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) and attempted cross tolerance between LSD and THC

  • Harris Isbell
  • D. R. Jasinski
Original Investigations

Summary

  1. 1.

    The objective and subjective effects of 0.5 and 1.5 mcg/kg of LSD intramuscularly were compared with those of 75 and 225 mcg/kg of (-)-Δ9-trans-tetrahydrocannabinol by smoking in the same eight subjects.

     
  2. 2.

    The objective effects of LSD and THC differed markedly. LSD increased body temperature, systolic and diastolic blood pressure, lowered the threshold for the knee-jerk, and dilated the pupils. THC had none of these effects but caused more marked tachycardia than did LSD.

     
  3. 3.

    The subjective effects of the two drugs could not be readily distinguished by the methods used. Both LSD and THC are psychotomimetic drugs.

     
  4. 4.

    Patients tolerant to LSD were not cross-tolerant to THC, indicating that the mental effects of the two drugs are probably mediated by different mechanisms.

     

Key-Words

Cannabis Marihuana (−)-Δ9-TetrahydrocannabinoI Lysergic Acid Diethylamide LSD Tolerance LSD and THC Cross-Tolerance 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Abramson, H. A., M. E. Jarvik, M. R. Kauffman, C. Kornetsky, A. Levine, and M. Wagner: Lysergic acid diethylamide (LSD-25): I. Physiological and perceptual responses. J. Psychol. 39, 3–60 (1955).Google Scholar
  2. Adams, R., S. MacKenzie, Jr., and S. Loewe: Tetrahydrocannabinol homologs with doubly branched alkyl groups in the 3-position. XVIII. J. Amer. chem. Soc. 70, 664–668 (1948).Google Scholar
  3. Chopra, R. N., and G. S. Chopra: Present position of hemp drug addiction in India. Indian med. Ees. Mem. 31, 1–119 (1939).Google Scholar
  4. Edwards, A. L.: Statistical analyses for students in psychology and education. New York: Rhinehart and Co. 1946.Google Scholar
  5. Finney, D. J.: Statistical method in Bioassay, Ed. 2. New York: Hafner Publishing Co. 1964.Google Scholar
  6. Haertzen, C. A.: Development of scales on batterns of drug effects using the addition research center inventory (ARCI). Psychol. Rep. 18, 163–194 (1966).Google Scholar
  7. Isbell, H., C. W. Gorodetzsky, D. Jasinki, U. Claussen, F. v. Spulak, and F. Korte: Effects of (−)-Δ 9trans-tetrahydrocannabinol in man. Psychopharmacologia (Berl.) 11, 184–188 (1967).Google Scholar
  8. Lewin, L.: Phantastica: Narcotic and stimulating drugs, their use and abuse. (Translated from German.) New York: E. P. Dutton 1964.Google Scholar
  9. Winter, C. A., and L. Flataker: Studies on heptazone (6-morpholino-4,4-diphenyl-3-heptanone hydrochloride) in comparison with other analgesic drugs. J. Pharmacol. exp. Ther. 98, 305–317 (1950).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1969

Authors and Affiliations

  • Harris Isbell
    • 1
    • 2
  • D. R. Jasinski
    • 3
  1. 1.Departments of Medicine and PharmacologyUniversity of Kentucky, Medical CenterLexington
  2. 2.Department of Health, Education and WelfareN.I.M.H. Addiction Research CenterLexingtonUSA
  3. 3.NIMH Addiction Research Center Lexington

Personalised recommendations