Advertisement

Psychopharmacologia

, Volume 14, Issue 2, pp 95–105 | Cite as

An examination of the effects of stimulant and depressant drugs on escape/avoidance conditioning in strains of rats selectively bred for emotionality/non-emotionality

  • B. D. Gupta
  • H. C. Holland
Original Investigations

Summary

Two of the main hypotheses concerning the role of emotionality (as an excitatory state) in the determination of escape/avoidance conditioning are juxtaposed, and their explanatory force tested by the use of constitutionally differentiated levels of reactivity in rats and the interaction these constitutional states may have with different drugs (assumed to affect different neural structures) and different doses of such drugs. From an analysis of these main effects and their interactions a complex set of relationships emerge which suggest that all the variables employed, with the exception of “sex”, are likely to be relevant to a consideration of those factors subserving differences in conditioning and learning.

Key-Words

Emotionality Escape/Avoidance Drugs, and Drugs X Strain Interaction 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Breggin, P. R.: Sedative-like effects of epinephrine—a review. Arch. gen. Psychiat. 12, 255–259 (1965).Google Scholar
  2. Broadhurst, P. L.: Determinants of emotionality in the rat; 1. Situational factors. Brit. J. Psychol. 48, 1–12 (1957).Google Scholar
  3. —, and S. Levine: Behavioural consistency in strains of rats selectively bred for emotional elimination. Brit. J. Psychol. 54, 121–125 (1963).Google Scholar
  4. Eysenck, H. J.: The dynamics of anxiety and hysteria. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul 1957.Google Scholar
  5. —: Emotion as a determinant of integrative learning: an experimental study. Behav. Res. Ther. 1, 197–211 (1963).Google Scholar
  6. —: Extraversion and the acquisition of eyeblink and GSR conditioned responses. Psychol. Bull. 63, 258–270 (1965).Google Scholar
  7. Franks, C. M., and D. Trouton: Effects of amobarbital sodium and dexamphetamine sulphate on the conditioning of the eyeblink response. J. comp. physiol. Psychol. 51, 220–222 (1958).Google Scholar
  8. Gregory, K., B. D. Gupta, and H. C. Holland: The effects of drugs on activity in two strains of rats selectively bred for high and low emotionality. Life Sci. 6, 981–988 (1967).Google Scholar
  9. Gupta, B. D., and K. Gregory: The effects of drugs and their combinations on the rearing response in two strains of rats. Psychopharmacologia (Berl.) 11, 365–371 (1967).Google Scholar
  10. Hall, C. S.: The genetics of behavior. In Handbook of Experimental Psychology, pp. 304–329. Ed. S. S. Stevens. New York: Wiley 1951.Google Scholar
  11. Hearst, E., and R. E. Whalen: Facilitating effects of d-amphetamine on discriminated avoidance performance. J. comp. physiol. Psychol. 56, 124–128 (1963).Google Scholar
  12. Holland, H. C., and B. D. Gupta: Some correlated measures of activity and reactivity in two strains of rats selectively bred for differences in the acquisition of a conditioned avoidance response. Anim. Behav. 14, 574–580 (1966).Google Scholar
  13. — —: The effects of different doses of methylpentynol on escape/avoidance conditioning in two strains of rats selectively bred for high and low “emotionality”. Psychopharmacologia (Berl.) 9, 419–425 (1966a).Google Scholar
  14. — —: The effect of methylpentynol carbamate on the acquisition of a conditioned avoidance response (C.A.R.) Psychopharmacologia (Berl.) 10, 220–225 (1967).Google Scholar
  15. Holland, H. C., and B. D. Gupta: An examination of the effects of some central and autonomic nervous system stimulant and depressant drugs on one form of exploratory activity in rats. Life Sci. 6, 63–70 (1967a).Google Scholar
  16. Jay, G. E.: Genetic strains and stock. Methodology of mammalian genetics, pp. 83–126. Ed. W. J. Burdette. San Francisco: Holden-Day 1963.Google Scholar
  17. Joffe, J. M.: Avoidance learning and failure to learn in two strains of rats selectively bred for emotionality. Psychon. Sci. 1, 185–186 (1964).Google Scholar
  18. Krieckhaus, E. E.: Decrement in avoidance behaviour following mammilothalmic tracotomy in rats and subsequent recovery with d-amphetamine. J. comp. physiol. Psychol. 60, 31–35 (1965).Google Scholar
  19. Kosman, M. E., and R. W. Gerard: The effect of adrenaline on a conditioned avoidance response. J. comp. physiol. Psychol. 48, 506–508 (1955).Google Scholar
  20. Lat, J.: The relationship of the individual differences in the regulation of food intake, growth, and excitability of the central nervous system. Physiol. bohemoslov. 5, 38–42 (1956).Google Scholar
  21. Levine, S., and S. J. England: Temporal factors in avoidance learning. J. comp. physiol. Psychol. 53, 282–283 (1960).Google Scholar
  22. Owen, S.: The effect on avoidance response extinction in rats of CS continuation and emotional constitution. J. gen. Psychol. 103, 147–151 (1963).Google Scholar
  23. Powell, B. J., L. K. Martin, and D. K. Kamano: Failure to find improved shuttlebox avoidance performance using d-amphetamine sulphate. Psychol. Rep. 17, 330 (1965).Google Scholar
  24. Spence, K. W., and J. A. Taylor: Anxiety and strength of UCS as determinants of amount of eyelid conditioning. J. exp. Psychol. 42, 183–188 (1951).Google Scholar
  25. Yerkes, R. M., and J. D. Dodson: The relation of strength of stimulus to rapidity of habit formation. J. comp. neurol. Psychol. 18, 459–482 (1908).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1969

Authors and Affiliations

  • B. D. Gupta
    • 1
  • H. C. Holland
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Institute of PsychiatryLondon, S.E.5
  2. 2.Institute of PsychiatryThe Bethlem Royal HospitalBeckenhamEngland

Personalised recommendations