Marine Biology

, Volume 74, Issue 3, pp 319–326 | Cite as

Meiofaunal abundance and vertical zonation in a sublittoral soft bottom, with a test of the Haps corer

  • P. Jensen


Total meiofauna abundance was estimated to be 4.7×106 individuals m-2 in a sublittoral soft bottom when sampled by SCUBA diving in the Øresund. Nematode abundance was 4.5×106 (equal to 1.4 g organic carbon), harpacticoid copepods 148×103, kinorhynchs 45×103 and ostracods 28×103·m-2. Three main groups of metabolic types are proposed. Almost all harpacticoid copepods, kinorhynchs and ostracods were found in the uppermost flocculent bottom layer and among the nematodes the non-selective detritus feeding species dominated; nematodes in this layer were mainly small. Epistrate feeding nematodes dominated between 1 and 4 cm depth; the size of nematodes varied greatly (less than 0.1 μl and up to 65 μl) with a mean body volume of 2.6 to 3.7 μl. Non-selective deposit feeding nematodes dominated totally deeper than 4-cm depth, i.e. in and below the redox-potential-discontinuity (RPD) layer. They were of median size and in species composition different from those above 4-cm depth. Haps corer samples underestimated nematode and harpacticoid copepod numbers in the top cm; the abundances were 66 and 48% respectively of those obtained by divers. Therefore, this sampling gear cannot be recommended for meiofauna studies on muddy bottoms covered with a flocculent detritus layer.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literature cited

  1. Andrassy, I.: Die Rauminhalts und Gewichtsbestimmung der Fadenwürmer (Nematoden). Acta zool. Hung. 11, 1–5 (1956)Google Scholar
  2. Ankar, S. and R. Elmgren: The benthic macro-and meiofauna of the Askö—Landsort Area (Northern Baltic Proper). A stratified random sampling survey. Contr. Askö Lab. 11, 1–115 (1976)Google Scholar
  3. Arlt, G.: Vertical and horizontal microdistribution of the meiofauna in the Greifswalder Bodden. Oikos suppl. 15, 105–111 (1973)Google Scholar
  4. Boucher, G.: Distribution quantitative et qualitative des nématodes todes d'une station de vase terrigene côtière de Banyuls-sur-Mer Cah. Biol. Mar. 13, 457–474 (1972)Google Scholar
  5. Boucher, G.: Premières données écologiques sur les nématodés libres marins d'une station de vase côtière de Banyuls. Vie et Milieu 23 (1B), 69–100 (1973)Google Scholar
  6. Coull, B. C., G. F. R. Hicks and J. B. J. Wells: nematode/copepod ratios for monitoring pollution: A rebuttal. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 12, 378–381 (1981)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Edmonson, W. T. and G. G. Winberg (eds): A manual on methods for the assessment of secondary productivity in fresh waters, 358 pp. IBP Handbook No. 17. Oxford and Edinburgh 1971Google Scholar
  8. Elmgren, R.: Methods for sampling sublittoral soft bottom meiofauna. Oikos suppl. 15, 112–120 (1973)Google Scholar
  9. Findlay, S. and Tenore, K. R.: Effect of a free-living marine nematode (Diplolaimella chitwoodi) on detrital carbon mineralization. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 8, 161–166 (1982)Google Scholar
  10. Gerlach, S. A.: On the importance of marine meiofauna for benthos communities. Oecologia 6, 176–190 (1971)Google Scholar
  11. Gerlach, S. A.: Food-chain relationships in subtidal silty sand marine sediments and the role of meiofauna in stimulating bacterial productivity. Oecologia 33, 55–69 (1978)Google Scholar
  12. Gerlach, S. A. and M. Schrage: Life cycles in marine meiobenthos. Experiments at various temperatures with Monhystera disjuncta and Theristus pertenuis. Mar. Biol. 9, 274–280 (1971)Google Scholar
  13. Gray, J. S.: The ecology of marine sediments, 185 pp. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press 1981Google Scholar
  14. Hakala, I.: A new model of the Kajak bottom sampler, and other improvements in the zoobenthos sampling technique. Ann. Zool. Fennici 8, 422–426 (1971)Google Scholar
  15. Holme, N. A. and A. D. McIntyre (eds): Methods for the study of marine benthos, 334 pp. IBP Handbrook No. 16. Oxford and Edinburgh 1971Google Scholar
  16. Holopainen, I. J. and J. Sarvala: Efficiencies of two corers in sampling soft-bottom invertebrates. Ann. Zool. Fennici 12, 280–284 (1975)Google Scholar
  17. Jensen, K.: Comparison of two bottom samplers for benthos monitoring. Env. Techn. Letters 2, 81–84 (1981)Google Scholar
  18. Jensen, P.: Nematodes from the Øresund, Denmark. Spatial distribution patterns and determination of sample size. Proc. 3rd int. Meiofauna Conf. Hamburg, Aug. 1977 (Abstract) 1977Google Scholar
  19. Jensen, P.: Four nematoda Araeolaimida from the Øresund with remarks on the oesophageal structures in Aegialoalaimus. Cah. Biol. Mar. 19, 221–231 (1978a)Google Scholar
  20. Jensen, P.: Revision of Microlaimidae, erection of Molgolaimidae fam. n., and remarks on the systematic position of Paramicrolaimus (Nematoda, Desmodorida). Zool. Scr. 7, 159–173 (1978b)Google Scholar
  21. Jensen, P.: Revision of Comesomatidae (Nematoda). Zool. Scr. 8, 81–105 (1979)Google Scholar
  22. Jensen, P.: Species, distribution and a microhabitat theory for marine mud dwelling Comesomatidae (Nematoda) in European waters. Cah. Biol. Mar. 22, 231–241 (1981)Google Scholar
  23. Jensen, P.: Ecology of benthic and epiphytic nematodes. Hydrobiologia (In press)Google Scholar
  24. Jensen, P.: Reproductive ecology and carbon production of the free-living marine nematode Chromadorita tenuis (in preparation)Google Scholar
  25. Juario, J. V.: Neue freilebende Nematoden aus dem sublittoral der Deutschen Bucht. Veröff. Inst. Meeresforsch. Bremerh. 14, 275–303 (1974)Google Scholar
  26. Juario, J. V.: Nematode species composition and seasonal fluctuation of a sublittoral meiofauna community in the German Bight. Veröff. Inst. Meeresforsch. Bremerh. 15, 283–337 (1975)Google Scholar
  27. Kajak, Z.: Analysis of quantitative benthic methods. Ekologia Polska (A) 11, 1–56 (1963)Google Scholar
  28. Kanneworff, E. and W. Nicolaisen: The “Haps”. A frame-supported bottom corer. Ophelia 10, 119–129 (1973)Google Scholar
  29. Keynäs, K. and L. Keynäs: Meiofauna in soft bottom sediments at Tvärminne, northern Baltic. Methods and preliminary results. Mem. Soc. Fauna Flora Fenn. 54, 65–68 (1978)Google Scholar
  30. Lorenzen, S.: Die Nematodenfauna im Verklappungsgebiet für Abwasser nordwestlich von Helgoland. I. Araeolaimida und Monhysterida. Zool. Anz. 187, 223–248 (1971)Google Scholar
  31. McIntyre, A. D.: Deficiency of gravity corers for sampling meiobenthos and sediments. Nature, Lond. 321, 260 (1971)Google Scholar
  32. Raffaelli, D. G.: Monitoring with meiofauna.—A reply to Coull. Hicks and Wells (1981) and additional data. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 12, 381–382 (1981)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Raffaelli, D. G. and C. F. Mason: Pollution monitoring with meiofauna, using the ratio of nematodes to copepods. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 12, 158–163 (1981)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Scheibel, W.: Submarine experiments on benthic colonization of sediments in the western Baltic Sea. I. Technical layout. Mar. Biol. 28, 159–164 (1974)Google Scholar
  35. Scheibel, W.: Quantitative Untersuchungen am Meiobenthos eines Profils unterschiedlicher Sedimente in der westlichen Ostsee. Helgol. wiss. Meeresunters. 28, 305–312 (1976)Google Scholar
  36. Scheibel, W. and H. Rumohr: Meiofaunaentwicklung auf künstlichen Weichböden in der Kieler Bucht. Helgol. wiss. Meeresunters. 32, 305–312 (1979)Google Scholar
  37. Soyer, J.: Bionomie benthique du plateau continental de la côte catalane français. 3 Les peuplements de Copépodes Harpacticoides (Crustacea). Vie et Milieu 21 (1B), 337–551 (1970)Google Scholar
  38. Thorson, G.: Bottom communities. In: Treatise on marine ecology and palecology. Ed. by J. W. Hedgeperth, Geol. Soc. Amer. Mem. 67, 461–534 (1957)Google Scholar
  39. Vrancken, G., L. K. Thielemans, C. Heip and M. Vandycke: Aspects of the life cycle of Monhystera parelegantula (Nematoda, Monhysteridae). Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 6, 67–72 (1981)Google Scholar
  40. Warwick, R. M.: The nematode/copepod ratio and its use in pollution ecology. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 12, 329–333 (1981a)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Warwick, R. M.: The influence of temperature and salinity on energy partitioning in the marine nematode Diplolaimelloides bruciei. Oecologia 51, 318–325 (1981b)Google Scholar
  42. Warwick, R. M. and J. B. Buchanan: The meiofauna off the coast of Northumberland. I. The structure of the nematode population. J. mar. biol. Ass. U.K. 50, 129–146 (1970)Google Scholar
  43. Wieser, W.: Die Beziehung zwischen Mundhöhlengestalt, Ernährungsweise und Vorkommen bei freilebenden marinen Nematoden. Ark. Zool. (Ser. 2) 4, 439–484 (1953)Google Scholar
  44. Wieser, W.: Benthic studies in Buzzard Bay. II. The meiofauna. Limnol. Oceanogr. 5, 121–137 (1960)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1983

Authors and Affiliations

  • P. Jensen
    • 1
  1. 1.Marine Biological LaboratoryUniversity of CopenhagenHelsingørDenmark

Personalised recommendations