Planta

, Volume 155, Issue 1, pp 76–81 | Cite as

Tolerance of Borya nitida, a poikilohydrous angiosperm, to heat, cold and high-light stress in the hydrated state

  • Suzan E. Hetherington
  • Robert M. Smillie
Article

Abstract

Borya nitida Labill., a plant able to colonize rock outcrops and shallow sands in areas of high incident solar radiation in Western Australia, was examined for its tolerance to extremes of temperature, and to intense visible radiation. Stress injury to the leaves from heat, chilling or photoinhibitory light was followed by the decrease in in-vivo variable chlorophyll fluorescence. Heat injury was also ascertained by an increase in the “constant” fluorescence. Borya nitida leaves were extremely heat tolerant when heated at 1° C min-1. In-vivo variable chlorophyll fluorescence was detectable up to 55° C, several degrees higher than either maize or barley which are, respectively, adapted to warm and cool climates. An increase in “constant” fluorescence occurred above 50° C in B. nitida. This compares with values in the literature of 48–49° C for three desert plants from Death Valley, California, and 44–48° C for ten species of tropical plants. Unlike the Death-Valley plants, the high degree of heat tolerance found in B. nitida did not require prior acclimation by growth at high temperatures. Borya nitida was also tolerant of a chilling temperature of 0° C. Plants grown at a low photon fluence rate (120 μmol m-2s-1) were irreversibly photoinhibited by light at 650 μmol m-2s-1. Plants grown in sunlight resisted photoinhibition; however, the capacity to withstand photoinhibition was no greater than that of plants from less extreme environments.

Key words

Borya Chlorophyll fluorescence (and stress) Desert plant Photoinhibition Temperature stress (cold, heat) 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Björkman, O. (1975) Thermal stability of the photosynthetic apparatus in intact leaves. Carnegie Inst. Washington Yearb. 74, 748–751Google Scholar
  2. Critchley, C., Smillie, R.M. (1981) Leaf chlorophyll fluorescence as an idicator of high light stress (photoinhibition) in Cucumis sativus L. Aust. J. Plant Physiol. 8, 133–141Google Scholar
  3. Emmett, J.M., Walker, D.A. (1969) Thermal uncoupling in choroplasts. Biochim. Biophys. Acta. 180, 424–425PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Gaff, D.F., Churchill, D.M. (1976) Borya nitida Labill. — an Australian species in the Liliaceae with desiccation-tolerant leaves. Aust. J. Bot. 24, 209–224Google Scholar
  5. Gaff, D.F., Hallam, N.D. (1974) Resurrecting desiccated plants. In: Mechanism of regulation of plant growth, Bieleski, R.L., Furguson, A.R., Cresswell, M.M., eds. R. Soc. N.Z. Bull. 12, 389–393Google Scholar
  6. Gaff, D.F., Zee, S.-Y., O'Brien, T.P. (1976) The fine structure of dehydrated and reviving leaves of Borya nitida Labill. —a desiccation-tolerant plant. Aust. J. Bot. 24, 225–236Google Scholar
  7. Geiger, R. (1965) Die Atmosphäre der Erde. Perthes, DarmstadGoogle Scholar
  8. Hetherington, S.E. (1981) The effect of dehydration on chloroplast structure and function in Borya nitida. Ph. D. thesis, Monash University, Clayton, Vic., AustraliaGoogle Scholar
  9. Holt, A.S., French, C.S. (1946) The photochemical production of oxygen and hydrogen ion by isolated chloroplasts. Arch. Biochem. 9, 25–43Google Scholar
  10. Kaniuga, Z., Sochanowicz, B., Zabek, J., Krzystyniak, K. (1978) Photosynthetic apparatus in chilling-sensitive plants. I. Reactivation of Hill reaction activity inhibited in the cold and dark storage of detached leaves and intact plants. Planta 140, 121–128Google Scholar
  11. Kok, B. (1956) On the inhibition of photosynthesis by intense light. Biochim. Biophy. Acta. 21, 234–244Google Scholar
  12. Lange, O.L. (1953) Hitze- und Trockenresistenz der Flechten in Beziehung zu ihrer Verbreitung. Flora 140, 39–97Google Scholar
  13. Lavorel, J., Etienne, A.-L. (1971) In vivo chlorophyll fluorescence. In: Primary processes of photosynthesis, pp. 203–268, Barber, J. ed. Elsevier/North-Holland Biomedical Press, AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
  14. Margulies, M.M. (1972) Effect of cold-storage of bean leaves on photosynthetic reactions of isolated chloroplasts. Inability to donate electrons to photosystem II and relation to manganese content. Biochim. Biophys. Acta. 267, 96–103PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Molotkovsky, Y.G., Zheskova, I.M. (1965) The influence of heating on the morphology and photochemical activity of isolated chloroplasts. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 20, 411–415PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Papageorgiou, G. (1975) Chlorophyll fluorescence: An intrinsic probe of photosynthesis. In: Bioenergetics of photosynthesis, pp. 319–371, Govindjee, ed. Academic Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  17. Pearcy, R.W., Berry, J.A., Fork, D.C. (1977) Effects of growth temperature on the thermal stability of the photosynthetic apparatus of Atriplex lentiformis (Torr.) Wats. Plant Physiol. 59, 873–878Google Scholar
  18. Powles, S.B., Critchley, C. (1980) The effect of ligh intnsity during growth on photoinhibition of intact bean leaflets. Plant Physiol. 65, 1181–1187Google Scholar
  19. Powles, S.B., Osmond, C.B. (1978) Inhibition of the capacity and efficiency of photosynthesis in bean leaflets illuminated in a CO2-free atmosphere at low O2: a possible role for photorespiration. Aust. J. Plant Physiol. 5, 619–629Google Scholar
  20. Powles, S.B., Osmond, C.B., Thorne, S.W. (1979) Photoinhibition of intact attached leaves of C3 plants illuminated in the absence of both carbon dioxide and of photorespiration. Plant Physiol. 64, 982–988Google Scholar
  21. Rogers, R.W. (1971) Distribution of the lichen Chondropsis semiviridis in relation to its heat and drought resistance. New Phytol. 70, 1069–1077Google Scholar
  22. Santarius, K.A., Müller, M. (1979) Investigations on heat resistance of spinach leaves. Planta 146, 529–538Google Scholar
  23. Schreiber, U., Berry, J.A. (1977) Heat-induced changes of chlorophyll fluorescence in intact leaves correlated with damage of the photosynthetic apparatus. Planta 136, 233–238Google Scholar
  24. Smillie, R.M. (1979) The useful chloroplast: a new approach for investigating chilling stress in plants. In: Low temperatures stress in crop plants, pp. 187–202, Lyons, J.M., Graham, D., Raison, J.K., eds. Academic Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  25. Smillie, R.M., Gibbons, G.C. (1981) Heat tolerance and heat hardening in crop plants measured by chlorophyll fluorescence. Carlsberg Res. Commun. 46, 395–403Google Scholar
  26. Smillie, R.M., Nott, R. (1979) Heat injury in leaves of alpine, temperate and tropical plants. Aust. J. Plant Physiol. 6, 135–141Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1982

Authors and Affiliations

  • Suzan E. Hetherington
    • 1
    • 3
  • Robert M. Smillie
    • 2
    • 3
  1. 1.Botany DepartmentMonash UniversityClaytonAustralia
  2. 2.Plant Physiology UnitCSJRO Division of Food ResearchSydneyAustralia
  3. 3.School of Biological SciencesMacquarie UniversitySyndneyAustralia

Personalised recommendations