Early stages of chemically induced liver carcinogenesis by oral administration of the antihistaminic methapyrilene hydrochloride

  • G. Fischer
  • M. Altmannsberger
  • A. Schauer
  • N. Katz
Original Papers Experimental Oncology

Summary

The antihistaminic drug methapyrilene hydrochloride, which induces liver tumors in rats, was administrated orally to female Wistar rats. The animals were killed after 21, 38, 77, 119, 181, and 196 days. The activities of adenosine-5-triphosphatase (ATPase) and γ-glutamyltranspeptidase (γ-GT) in the liver were investigated histochemically. At 21 days, a homogeneous decrease of ATPase activity as well as a slight increase of γ-GT activity was found in the periportal zone. Additionally, after 38 days hepatocellular foci with reappearance of γ-GT occurred mainly in the periportal zone. After 119 days, foci with increased γ-GT activity as well as a significant reduction of ATPase activity could be observed predominantly in the periportal region. The size and number of these putative preneoplastic foci were increased according to the time of administration of methapyrilene hydrochloride. After 181 days of methapyrilene hydrochloride treatment three of five animals developed hyperplastic nodules with corresponding alterations of enzyme activities. Methapyrilene hydrochloride — a carcinogen with an unknown mechanism of reaction-produces preneoplastic changes that are analogous to the well known preneoplastic lesions in the liver observed after administration of other carcinogenic agents.

Key words

Methapyrilene Liver tumor Preneoplasia Adenosine-5-triphosphatase γ-Glutamyltranspeptidase 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bannasch P (1968) The cytoplasm of hepatocytes during carcinogensis. Rec Results Cancer Res 19:1–100Google Scholar
  2. Cameron R, Kellen J, Kolin A, Malkin A, Farber E (1978) γ-glutamyltransferase in putative premalignant liver cell populations during hepatocarcinogenesis. Cancer Res 38:823–829PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Farber E (1977) Experimentell liver carcinogenesis: A perspective. In: Remmer H, Bannasch P, Bolt HM, Popper H (eds) Primary liver tumors. 25th Falk Symposium. MTP Press, Lancaster (pp 357–375)Google Scholar
  4. Fischer G, Ullrich D, Katz N, Bock KW, Schauer A (1983) Immunohistochemical and biochemical detection of uridine-diphosphateglucuronyltransferase (UDP-GT) activity in putative preneoplastic liver foci. Virchows Arch [Cell Pathol] 42:193–200Google Scholar
  5. Gössner W, Friedrich-Freska M (1964) Histochemische Untersuchungen über die Glucose-6-Phosphatase in der Rattenleber während der Cancersierung durch Nitrosamine. Z Naturforsch [B] 19:862–863Google Scholar
  6. Goldfarb S (1973) A morphological and histochemical study of carcinogenesis of the liver in rats fed 3′-methyl-4-dimethyl-aminoazobenzene. Cancer Res 33:1119–1128PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Kalengayi MM, Desmet VJ (1975) Sequential histological and histochemical study of the rat liver during aflatoxin B1-induced carcinogenesis. Cancer Res 35:2845–2852PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Kitagawa T, Sugano H (1973) Combined enzyme histochemical and radioautographic studies on areas of hyperplasia in the liver of rats fed N-2-fluorenylacetamide. Cancer Res 33:2993–3001PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Lijinsky W, Taylor HW (1977) Feeding tests in rats on mixtures of nitrite with secondary tertiary amines of environmental importance. Food Cosmet Toxicol 15 (4):269–274PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Lijinski W, Reuber MD, Blackwell BN (1980) Liver tumours induced in rats by oral administration on the antihistaminic methapyrilene hydrochloride. Science 209:817–819PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Lijinski W, Muschik GM (1982) Distribution of the liver carcinogen methapyrilene in Fischer rats and its interaction with macromolecules. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 103:69–73PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Peraino C, Frey RJM, Grube DD (1978) Drug-induced enchancement of hepatic tumorigenesis. In: Slage TJ, Sivak A, Boutwell RK (eds) Mechanisms of tumor promotion and cocarcinogens. Raven Press, New York (Carcinogenesis Vol 2, pp 421–432)Google Scholar
  13. Pitot HC, Sirica AE (1980) The stages of initiation and promotion in hepatocarcinogenesis. Biochim Biophys Acta 605:191–215PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Rutenberg AM, Kim H, Fischbein JW, Harper JS, Wasserburg HC, Seligmann AM (1969) Histochemical and ultrastructural demonstration of gamma-glutamyl transpeptidase activity. J Histochem Cytochem 17:517–526PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Schauer A (1966) Histochemische und biochemische Untersuchungen bei der Cancerisierung mit Diaethylnitrosamin an der Rattenleber. Verh dtsch Ges Pathol 50:344–347Google Scholar
  16. Scherer E, Emmelot P (1975) Foci of altered liver cells induced by a single dose of diethylnitrosamine and partial hepatectomy: Their contribution to hepatocarcinogenesis in the rat. Eur J Cancer 11:145–154PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Wachstein M, Meisel E (1957) Histochemistry of hepatic phosphatases at a physiologic pH. Am J Clin Pathol 27:13–23PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Weisburger JH, Williams GM (1980) Chemical carcinogens. Doull J et al. (eds) Toxicology: The basic science of poisons, 2nd edn. Macmillan, New York, pp 84–138Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1983

Authors and Affiliations

  • G. Fischer
    • 1
  • M. Altmannsberger
    • 1
  • A. Schauer
    • 1
  • N. Katz
    • 2
  1. 1.Zentrum PathologieUniversity of GöttingenGöttingenFederal Republic of Germany
  2. 2.Zentrum BiochemieUniversity of GöttingenGöttingenFederal Republic of Germany

Personalised recommendations