Advertisement

Springer Nature is making Coronavirus research free. View research | View latest news | Sign up for updates

Cato on chauntecleer: Chaucer's sophisticated audience

  • 41 Accesses

  • 1 Citations

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Works Cited

  1. Brewer, Derek. “Chaucer: What Is The Nun's Priest's Tale Really About?” Trames 2 (April 1979), 9–25.

  2. Symbolic Stories: Traditional Narratives of the Family Drama in English Literature. Totowa: Rowman, 1980.

  3. Brusendorff, Aage. “He Knew Nat Catoun for His Wit Was Rude.” Studies in English Philology: A Miscellany in Honor of Frederick Kalaeber. Ed. Kemp, Malone and Martin, B. Ruud. Minneapolis: U of Minnesota P, 1929. 320–39.

  4. Burrow, John. Ricardian Poetry: Chaucer, Gower, Langland and the Gawain Poet. London: Routledge, 1971.

  5. Chaucer, Geoffrey. The Works of Geoffrey Chaucer. Ed. F. N. Robinson. 2nd ed. Boston: Houghton, 1957.

  6. Disticha Catonis. Ed. Marcus Boas and H.J. Botschuyver. Amsterdam: North Holland, 1952.

  7. Langland William. Piers Plowman: An Edition of the C-Text. Ed. Derek Pearsall. London: Arnold, 1978.

  8. Mehl, Dieter. “The Audience of Chaucer's Troilus and Criseyde.” Chaucer and Middle English Studies in Honour of Rossell Hope Robbins. Ed. Beryl Rowland. London: Routledge, 1971. 173–89.

  9. Ong, Walter J., S.J. “The Writer's Audience Is Always a Fiction.” PMLA 90 (1975): 9–21.

  10. Piers Plowman: The A Version: Will's Vision of Piers Plowman and Do-Well. Ed. George Kane. London: Athlone, 1960.

  11. Piers Plowman: The B Version: Will's Visions of Piers Plowman, Do-Well, Do-Better and Do-Best. Ed. George Kane and E. Talbot Donaldson. London: Athlone, 1975.

  12. Pratt, Robert A.. “Some Latin Sources of the Nonnes Preest on Dreams.” Speculum 52 (1977): 538–70.

  13. Rickert, Edith “Chaucer at School.” Modern Philology 29 (1932): 257–74.

Download references

Author information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Thomas, P.R. Cato on chauntecleer: Chaucer's sophisticated audience. Neophilologus 72, 278–283 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00399681

Download citation

Keywords

  • Comparative Literature
  • Historical Linguistic
  • Sophisticated Audience