The influence of simulated inflorescence design on feeding behavior of 3 male Eugenes fulgens (Rivoli's hummingbird) and one female Lampornis clemenciae (Bluethroated hummingbird) was studied in the laboratory using artificial flowers. Five two-dimensional and three three-dimensional arrangements provided constant rewards per artificial flower. Visits to two-dimensional arrangements had more flower visits per feeding bout, proportionally more flower revisits, and shorter time between flowers than visits to three-dimensional arrangements. This suggests inflorescence design may influence pollen movement by hummingbirds.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Price includes VAT for USA
Subscribe to journal
Immediate online access to all issues from 2019. Subscription will auto renew annually.
This is the net price. Taxes to be calculated in checkout.
Bawa KS (1980) Evolution of dioecy in flowering plants. Ann Rev Ecol Syst 11:15–39
Corbet SA, Fallows CM, Harrison T, Hartley G (1981) Why do nectar-foraging bees and wasps work upwards on inflorescences? Oecologia 51:79–83
Daniel WW (1978) Applied Nonparametric Statistics. Houghton Mifflin, New York
Dunn OJ (1964) Multiple comparisons using rank sums. Technometrics 6:241–252
Hartling LK, Plowright RC (1979) Foraging by bumble bees on patches of artificial flowers: a laboratory study. Can J Zool 57:1866–1870
Hodges CM (1981) Optimal foraging in bumblebees: hunting by expectation. Anim Behav 29:1166–1171
Marden JH, Waddington KD (1981) Floral choice by honey bees in relation to the relative distances to flowers. Physiol Entomol 6:431–435
Morse DH (1980) The effect of nectar abundance on foraging patterns of bumble bees. Ecol Entomol 5:53–59
Pyke GH (1978) Optimal foraging in hummingbirds: testing the marginal value theorem. Amer Zool 18:739–752
Pyke GH (1979) Optimal foraging in bumblebees: rule of movement between flowers within inflorescences. Anim Behav 27:1167–1181
Pyke GH (1982) Foraging in bumblebees: rule of depature from an inflorescence. Can J Zool 60:417–428
Thomson JD, Maddison WP, Plowright RC (1982) Behavior of bumble bee pollinators of Aralia hispida Vent. (Araliaceae). Oecologia 54:326–336
Waddington KD (1980) Flight patterns of foraging bees relative to density of artificial flowers and distribution of nectar. Oecologia 44:199–204
Waddington KD, Heinrich B (1981) Patterns of movement and floral choice by foraging bees. In: (A. Kamil and T Sargent, eds) Foraging Behavior: Ecological, Ethological and Psychological Approaches. Garland Press, NY
Willson MF, Rathke BJ (1974) Adaptive design of the floral display in Asclepias syriaca L. Amer Midland Natur 92:47–57
Wolf LL, Hainsworth FR (1977) Temporal patterns of hummingbird feeding. Anim Behav 25:976–989
Wyatt R (1982) Inflorescence architecture: how flower number, arrangement, and phenology affect pollination and fruit-set. Amer J Bot 69:585–594
About this article
Cite this article
Hainsworth, F.R., Mercier, T. & Wolf, L.L. Floral arrangements and hummingbird feeding. Oecologia 58, 225–229 (1983). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00399221
- Artificial Flower
- Pollen Movement
- Flower Visit
- Constant Reward
- Floral Arrangement