Marine Biology

, Volume 70, Issue 2, pp 157–164

Chaotic genetic patchiness in an intertidal limpet, Siphonaria sp.

  • M. S. Johnson
  • R. Black
Article

Abstract

Variation of 4 polymorphic enzymes was studied for 2 yr (1978 and 1979) in an undescribed species of Siphonaria, a pulmonate limpet, from a rocky shore at Rottnest Island, Western Australia. Depending on the locus, significant genetic differences were found among sites along 50 m of shore, between high and low portions of the shore within sites, between adults and recruits, and between recruits in the 2 yr. This genetic heterogeneity does not follow a simple, consistent pattern, but forms a shifting, ephemeral genetic patchiness best described as chaotic. This patchiness may result from temporal variation of numbers and genotypes of recruits, which leads to the proposal that planktonic dispersal, although causing uniformity on a large scale, can give rise to fine-scale genetic patchiness.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literature Cited

  1. Berger, E.: Gene-enzyme variation in three sympatric species of Littorina. Biol. Bull. mar. biol. Lab., Woods Hole 145, 83–90 (1973)Google Scholar
  2. Black, R.: Competition between intertidal limpets: an intrusive niche on a steep resource gradient. J. Anim. Ecol. 48, 401–411 (1979)Google Scholar
  3. Black, R., K. Fisher, A. Hill and P. McShane: Physical and biological conditions on a steep intertidal gradient at Rottnest Island, Western Australia. Aust. J. Ecol. 4, 67–74 (1979)Google Scholar
  4. Black, R. and M. S. Johnson: Genetic differentiation independent of intertidal gradients in the pulmonate limpet Siphonaria kurracheensis. Mar. Biol. 64, 79–84 (1981)Google Scholar
  5. Doyle, R. W.: Choosing between darkness and light: the ecological genetics of photic behaviour in the planktonic larva of Spirorbis borealis. Mar. Biol. 25, 311–317 (1974)Google Scholar
  6. Flowerdew, M. W. and D. J. Crisp: Allelic esterase isozymes, their variation with season, position on the shore and stage of development in the cirripede Balanus balanoides. Mar. Biol. 35, 319–325 (1976)Google Scholar
  7. Giesel, J. T.: On the maintenance of a shell pattern and behaviour polymorphism in Acmaea digitalis, a limpet. Evolution, Lawrence, Kansas 24, 98–119 (1970)Google Scholar
  8. Gillespie, J. H. and C. H. Langley: A general model to account for enzyme variation in natural populations. Genetics, Austin, Tex. 76, 837–848 (1974)Google Scholar
  9. Hedrick, F. W., M. E. Ginevan and E. P. Ewing: Genetic polymorphism in heterogeneous environments. A. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 7, 1–32 (1976)Google Scholar
  10. Johnson, M. S.: Adaptive lactate dehydrogenase variation in the crested blenny, Anoplarchus. Heredity, Lond. 27, 205–226 (1971)Google Scholar
  11. Johnson, R. G.: Temperature variation in the infaunal environment of a sand flat. Limnol. Oceanogr. 10, 114–120 (1965)Google Scholar
  12. Johnson, R. G.: Salinity of interstitial water in a sandy beach. Limnol. Oceanogr. 12, 1–7 (1967)Google Scholar
  13. Koehn, R. K., R. Milkman and J. B. Mitton: Population genetics of marine pelecypods. IV. Selection, migration and genetic differentiation in the blue mussel, Mytilus edulis. Evolution, Lawrence, Kansas 30, 2–31 (1976)Google Scholar
  14. Koehn, R. K., F. J. Turano and J. B. Mitton: Population genetics of marine pelecypods. II. Genetic differences in microhabitats of Modiolus demissus. Evolution, Lawrence, Kansas 27, 100–105 (1973)Google Scholar
  15. Levins, R.: Evolution in changing environments, 120 pp. Princeton: Princeton University Press 1968Google Scholar
  16. Levinton, J. S. and D. L. Fundiller: An ecological and physiological approach to the study of biochemical polymorphisms. Proc. 9th Eur. mar. Biol. Symp. 165–178 (1975). (Ed. by H. Barnes. Aberdeen: Aberdeen University Press)Google Scholar
  17. Levinton, J. S. and H. H. Lassen: Selection, ecology and evolutionary adjustment within bivalve mollusc populations. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. (Ser. B) 284, 403–415 (1978)Google Scholar
  18. Milkman, R. and R. K. Koehn: Temporal variation in the relationship between size, numbers, and an allele-frequency in a population of Mytilus edulis. Evolution, Lawrence, Kansas 31, 103–115 (1977)Google Scholar
  19. Newell, R. C.: Biology of intertidal animals, 781 pp. Faversham, Kent, U.K.: Marine Ecological Surveys Ltd. 1979Google Scholar
  20. Nichols, E. A. and F. H. Ruddle: A review of enzyme polymorphism, linkage and electrophoretic conditions for mouse and somatic cell hybrids in starch gels. J. Histochem. Cytochem. 21, 1066–1081 (1973)Google Scholar
  21. Scheltema, R. S.: Larval dispersal as a means of genetic exchange between geographically separated populations of shallow water benthic marine gastropods. Biol. Bull. mar. biol. Lab., Woods Hole 140, 284–322 (1971)Google Scholar
  22. Selander, R. K., M. H. Smith, S. Y. Yang and W. E. Johnson: Biochemical polymorphism and systematics in the genus Peromyscus. I. Variation in the old-field mouse Peromyscus polionotus. Stud. Genet., Austin, Tex. 6, 49–90 (1971)Google Scholar
  23. Simpson, G. G., A. Roe and R. C. Lewontin: Quantitative zoology, 400 pp. New York: Harcourt, Brace&Co. 1960Google Scholar
  24. Struhsaker, J. W.: Selection mechanisms associated with intraspecific shell variation in Littorina picta (Prosobranchia: Mesogastropoda). Evolution, Lawrence, Kansas 22, 459–480 (1968)Google Scholar
  25. Tracey, M. L., N. F. Bellet and C. D. Gravem: Excess allozyme homozygosity and breeding population structure in the mussel Mytilus californianus. Mar. Biol. 32, 303–311 (1975)Google Scholar
  26. Zouros, E., S. M. Singh and H. E. Miles: Growth rate in oysters: an overdominant phenotype and its possible explanations. Evolution, Lawrence, Kansas 34, 856–867 (1980)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1982

Authors and Affiliations

  • M. S. Johnson
    • 1
  • R. Black
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of ZoologyUniversity of Western AustraliaNedlandsAustralia

Personalised recommendations