Planta

, Volume 179, Issue 4, pp 466–474

Non-hydraulic signals from maize roots in drying soil: inhibition of leaf elongation but not stomatal conductance

  • Imad N. Saab
  • Robert E. Sharp
Article

Abstract

Conditions of soil drying and plant growth that lead to non-hydraulic inhibition of leaf elongation and stomatal conductance in maize (Zea mays L.) were investigated using plants grown with their root systems divided between two containers. The soil in one container was allowed to dry while the other container was kept well-watered. Soil drying resulted in a maximum 35% inhibition of leaf elongation rate which occurred during the light hours, with no measurable decline in leaf water potential (ψw). Leaf area was 15% less than in control plants after 18 d of soil drying. The inhibition of elongation was observed only when the soil ψw declined to below that of the leaves and, thus, the drying soil no longer contributed to transpiration. However, midday root ψw in the dry container (-0.29 MPa) remained much higher than that of the surrounding soil (-1.0 MPa) after 15 d of drying, indicating that the roots in drying soil were rehydrated in the dark.

To prove that the inhibition of leaf elongation was not caused by undetectable changes in leaf water status as a result of loss of half the watergathering capacity, one-half of the root system of control plants was excised. This treatment had no effect on leaf elongation or stomatal conductance. The inhibition of leaf elongation was also not explained by reductions in nutrient supply.

Soil drying had no effect on stomatal conductance despite variations in the rate or extent of soild drying, light, humidity or nutrition. The results indicate that non-hydraulic inhibition of leaf elongation may act to conserve water as the soil dries before the occurrence of shoot water deficits.

Key words

Leaf elongation Root signals Root to shoot communication Soil drying Stomatal conductance Zea (root signals) 

Symbol

ψw

water potential

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bates, L.M., Hall, A.E. (1981) Stomatal closure with soil water depletion not associated with changes in bulk leaf water status. Oecologia 50, 62–65Google Scholar
  2. Blackman, P.G., Davies, W.J. (1985) Root to shoot communication in maize plants of the effects of soil drying. J. Exp. Bot. 36, 39–48Google Scholar
  3. Boyer, J.S., Knipling, E.B. (1965) Isopiestic technique for measuring leaf water potentials with a thermocouple psychrometer. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 54, 1044–1051Google Scholar
  4. Bradford, K.J., Hsiao, T.C. (1982) Physiological responses to moderate water stress. In: Encyclopedia of plant physiology, N.S., vol. 12B. Physiological plant ecology. II. Water relations and carbon assimilation, pp. 232–253. Lange, O.L., Nobel, P.S., Osmond, C.B., Zeigler, H., eds., Springer, New York Berlin HeidelbergGoogle Scholar
  5. Christ, R.A. (1978) The elongation rate of wheat leaves. II. Effect of sudden light change on the elongation rate. J. Exp. Bot. 29, 611–618Google Scholar
  6. Davies, W.J., Mansfield, T.A., Wellburn, A.R. (1980) A role for abscisic acid in drought endurance and drought avoidance. In: Plant growth substances 1979, pp. 242–253, Skoog, F., ed. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New YorkGoogle Scholar
  7. Davies, W.J., Metcalfe, J., Lodge, T.A., Rosa da Costa, A. (1986) Plant growth substances and the regulation of growth under drought. Aust. J. Plant Physiol. 13, 105–125Google Scholar
  8. Davies, W.J., Sharp, R.E. (1981) The root a sensitive detector of a reduction in water availability? In: Mechanisms of assimilate distribution and plant growth regulators, pp. 53–67, Kralovic, J., ed. Slovak Society of Agriculture, FragueGoogle Scholar
  9. Gollan, T., Passioura, J.B., Munns, R. (1986) Soil water status affects the stomatal conductance of fully turgid wheat and sunflower leaves. Aust. J. Plant. Physiol. 13, 459–464Google Scholar
  10. Hartung, W., Radin, J.W., Hendrix, D.L. (1988) Abscisic acid movement into the apoplast of water-stressed cotton leaves. Role of apoplastic pH. Plant. Physiol. 86, 908–913Google Scholar
  11. Hoagland, D.R., Arnon, D.I. (1938) The water culture method for growing plants without soil. Cire. Calif. Agric. Station 347, 39Google Scholar
  12. Kramer, P.J. (1988) Changing concepts regarding plant water relations. Plant Cell Environ. 11, 565–568Google Scholar
  13. Masle, J., Passioura, J.B. (1987) The effect of soil strength on the growth of young wheat plants. Aust. J. Plant Physiol. 14, 643–656Google Scholar
  14. Michelena, V.A., Boyer, J.S. (1982) Complete turgor maintenance at low water potentials in the elongation region of maize leaves. Plant. Physiol. 69, 1145–1149Google Scholar
  15. Munns, R. (1987) Does leaf turgor determine leaf expansion rates in dry or saline soil? In: Physiology of cell expansion during plant growth, pp. 241–242, Cosgrove, D.J., Knievel, D.P., eds. American Society of Plant Physiologists, Rockville, Md.Google Scholar
  16. Munns, R., King, R.W. (1988) Abscisic acid is not the only stomatal inhibitor in the transpiration stream of wheat plants. Plant. Physiol. 88, 703–708Google Scholar
  17. Passioura, J.B. (1988a) Root signals control leaf expansion in wheat seedlings growing in drying soil. Aust. J. Plant Physiol. 15, 687–693Google Scholar
  18. Passioura, J.B. (1988b) Response to Dr. P.J. Kramer's article, “Changing concepts regarding plant water relations”, vol. 11, No. 7, pp. 565–568. Plant Cell Environ 11, 569-571Google Scholar
  19. Paterson, N.W., Weyers, J.D.B., A'Brook, R. (1988) The effect of pH on stomatal sensitivity to abscisic acid. Plant Cell Environ 11, 83–89Google Scholar
  20. Radin, J.W., Hendrix, D.L. (1988) The apoplastic pool of abscisic acid in cotton leaves in relation to stomatal closure. Planta 174, 180–186Google Scholar
  21. Radin, J.W., Parker, L.L., Guinn, G. (1982) Water relations of cotton plants under nitrogen deficiency. V. Environmental control over abscisic acid accumulation and stomatal sensitivity to abscisic acid. Plant Physiol. 70, 1066–1070Google Scholar
  22. Rosa da Costa, A., Metcalfe, J., Lodge, T.A., Davies, W.J. (1987) Soil drying and the resulting chemical and hydraulic effects on leaf growth. In: Plant responses to stress, pp. 267–275, Tenhunen, J.D., Catarino, F.M., Lange, O.L., Oechel, W.C., eds. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New YorkGoogle Scholar
  23. Sharp, R.E., Davies, W.J. (1989) Regulation of growth and development of plants growing with a restricted supply of water. In: Plant under stress, pp. 72–93, Jones, H.G., Flowers, T.L., Jones, M.B., eds. Cambridge University Press, LondonGoogle Scholar
  24. Turner, N.C. (1986) Adaptation to water deficits: a changing perspective. Aust. J. Plant. Physiol. 13, 175–190Google Scholar
  25. Zhang, J., Schurr, U., Davies, W.J. (1987) Control of stomatal behaviour by abscisic acid which apparently orginates in the roots. J. Exp. Bot. 38, 1174–1181Google Scholar
  26. Zhang, J., Davies, W.J. (1989) Abscisic acid produced in dehydrating roots may enable the plant to measure the water status of the soil. Plant Cell Environ. 12, 73–81Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1989

Authors and Affiliations

  • Imad N. Saab
    • 1
  • Robert E. Sharp
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of AgronomyUniversity of MissouriColumbiaUSA

Personalised recommendations