, Volume 162, Issue 3, pp 268–275 | Cite as

The effect of nitrogen supply on growth and water-use efficiency of xylem-tapping mistletoes

  • E. -D. Schulze
  • J. R. Ehleringer


Xylem-tapping mistletoes are known to have normally a higher rate of transpiration and lower water-use efficiency than their hosts. The relationships between water relations, nutrients and growth were investigated for Phoradendron juniperinum growing on Juniperus osteosperma (a non-nitrogen-fixing tree) and for Phoradendron californicum growing on Acacia greggii (a nitrogen-fixing tree). Xylem sap nitrogen contents were approximately 3.5 times higher in the nitrogen-fixing host than in the non-nitrogen-fixing host. The results of the present study show that mistletoe growth rates were sevenfold greater on a nitrogen-fixing host. At the same time, however, the differences in water-use efficiency between mistletoes and their hosts, which were observed on the non-nitrogen-fixing host did not exist when mistletoes were grown on hosts with higher nitrogen contents in their xylem sap. Growth rates and the accumulation of N, P, K, and Ca as well as values for carbon-isotope ratios of mistletoe tissues support the hypothesis that the higher transpiration rates of mistletoes represent a nitrogen-gathering mechanism.

Key words

Host parasite interactions Mistletoe Nutrient relations (mistletoes) Phoradendron Water relations (mistletoes) 



carbon-isotope ratio


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Atsatt, P.R. (1983) Host-parasite interaction in higher plants. In: Encyclopedia of plant physiology, N.S., vol. 12C: Physiological plant ecology III, pp. 519–535. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New YorkGoogle Scholar
  2. Farquhar, G.D., Ball, M.C., von Caemmerer, S., Roksandic, Z. (1982a) Effect of salinity and humidity on δ13C value of halophytes — evidence for diffusional isotope fractionation determined by the ratio of intercellular/atmospheric partial pressure of CO2 under different environmental conditions. Oecologia (Berlin) 52, 121–124Google Scholar
  3. Farquhar, G.D., O'Leary, M.H., Berry, J.A. (1982b) On the relationship between carbon isotope discrimination and the intercellular carbon dioxide concentration in leaves. Aust. J. Plant Physiol. 9, 121–137Google Scholar
  4. Glatzel, G. (1983) Mineral nutrition and water relations of hemiparasitic mistletoes: a question of partitioning. Experiments with Loranthus europaeus on Quercus petraea and Quercus robur. Oecologia (Berlin) 56, 193–201Google Scholar
  5. Hartel, O. (1937) Über den Wasserhaushalt von Viscum album L. Ber. Dtsch. Bot. Ges. 55, 310–321Google Scholar
  6. Kamerling, Z. (1910) Verdunstungsversuche mit tropischen Loranthaceae. Ber. Dtsch. Bot. Ges. 32, 17–24Google Scholar
  7. Körner, C., Scheel, J., Bauer, H. (1979) Maximum leaf diffusive conductance in vascular plants. Photosynthetica 13, 45–82Google Scholar
  8. Lamont, B.B., Southall, K.J. (1982) Distribution of mineral nutrients between the mistletoe, Amyema preissii, and its host, Acacia acuminata. Ann. Bot. (London) 40, 721–725Google Scholar
  9. Leonard, O.A., Hull, R.J. (1965) Translocation relationships in and between mistletoes and their hosts. Hilgardia 37, 115–153Google Scholar
  10. Lillivek, H.A. (1970) The determination of total organic nitrogen. In: Methods in food analysis, pp. 601–616, Joslyn, M.A., ed. Academic Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  11. Munz, P.A. (1959) A California Flora. University of California Press, BerkeleyGoogle Scholar
  12. Nicoloff, T. (1923) Contribution à la physiologie de la nutrition des parasites végétaux supérieurs. Rev. Gen. Bot. 35, 545–552Google Scholar
  13. Schulze, E.-D. (1982) Plant life forms and their carbon, water and nutrient relations. In: Encyclopedia of plant physiology, N.S., vol. 12B: Physiological plant ecology II, pp. 615–676, Lange, O.L., Nobel, P.S., Osmond, C.B., Ziegler, H., eds. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New YorkGoogle Scholar
  14. Schulze, E.-D., Hall, A.E. (1982) Stomatal responses, water loss and CO2 assimilation rates of plants in contrasting environments. In: Encyclopedia of plant physiology, N.S. vol 12B: Physiological plant ecology II, pp. 181–230, Lange, O.L., Nobel, P.S., Osmond, C.B., Ziegler, H., eds. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New YorkGoogle Scholar
  15. Schulze, E.-D., Turner, N.C., Glatzel, G. (1984) Carbon, water and nutrient relations of two mistletoes and their hosts: a hypothesis. Plant Cell Environ. 7, 293–299Google Scholar
  16. Tieszen, L.L., Hein, D., Quortrup, S., Troughton, J., Imbamba, S. (1979) Use of δ13C values to determine vegetation selectivity in East African herbivores. Oecologia (Berlin) 37, 351–359Google Scholar
  17. Wolfe, E.V. (1880) Aschenanalysen von landwirtschaftlichen Produkten, II. Teil. Weigant Hempel, Parey, BerlinGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1984

Authors and Affiliations

  • E. -D. Schulze
    • 1
    • 2
  • J. R. Ehleringer
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Lehrstuhl für Pflanzenökologie der UniversitätBayreuthGermany
  2. 2.Department of BiologyUniversity of UtahSalt Lake CityUSA

Personalised recommendations