Marine Biology

, Volume 65, Issue 1, pp 13–16 | Cite as

Appropriate use of regression analysis in marine biology

  • E. A. Laws
  • J. W. Archie
Article

Abstract

The Model I linear regression theory is often used in the analysis of data under conditions when the Model II theory is clearly needed. Implications derived from the use of the two theories can differ greatly when there is not a high degree of correlation between the X and Y variables. The geometric mean Model II method is easy to use, and is probably needed in the analysis of most field data, since the X variable in field data is rarely under the control of the investigator.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literature Cited

  1. Banse, K.: Determining the carbon-to-chlorophyll ratio of natural phytoplankton. Mar. Biol. 41, 199–212 (1977)Google Scholar
  2. Bartlett, M. S.: Fitting a straight line when both variables are subject to error. Biometrics 5 207–212 (1949)Google Scholar
  3. Berkson, J. B.: Are there two regressions? J. Am. statist. Ass. 45, 164–180 (1950)Google Scholar
  4. Champalbert, G. et R. Gaudy: Etude de la respiration chez des copépodes de niveaux bathymétriques variés dans la région sud marocaine et canarienne. Mar. Biol. 12, 159–169 (1972)Google Scholar
  5. Clarke, M. R. B.: The reduced major axis of a bivariate sample. Biometrika 67, 441–446 (1980)Google Scholar
  6. Crow, E. L., F. A. Davis, and M. W. Maxfield: Statistics manual, 288 pp. New York: Dover Publications 1960Google Scholar
  7. Gould, S. J.: Allometry and size in ontogeny and phylogeny. Biol. Rev. 41, 587–640 (1966)Google Scholar
  8. Gould, S. J. and D. S. Woodruff: Natural history of Cerion VIII: Little Bahama Bank—a revision based on genetics, morphometrics, and geographic distribution. Bull. Mus. comp. Zool. Harv. 148, 371–415 (1978)Google Scholar
  9. Ikeda, T.: Relationships between respiration rate and body size in marine plankton animals as a function of the temperature of habitat. Bull. Fac. Fish. Hokkaido Univ. 21, 91–112 (1970)Google Scholar
  10. Kuhry, B. and L. F. Marcus: Bivariate linear models in biometry. Syst. Zool. 26, 201–209 (1977)Google Scholar
  11. Ricker, W. E.: Linear regressions in fishery research. J. Fish. Res. Bd Can. 30, 409–434 (1973)Google Scholar
  12. Ricker, W. E.: A note concerning Professor Jolicoeur's comments. J. Fish. Res. Bd Can. 32, 1494–1498 (1975)Google Scholar
  13. Sokal, R. R. and F. J. Rohlf: Biometry. The principles and practice of statistics in biological research, 776 pp. San Francisco: W. H. Freeman & Co. 1969Google Scholar
  14. Steele, J. H. and I. E. Baird: Further relations between primary production, chlorophyll, and particulate carbon. Limnol. Oceanogr. 7, 42–47 (1962)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1981

Authors and Affiliations

  • E. A. Laws
    • 1
  • J. W. Archie
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Oceanography and ZoologyUniversity of HawaiiHonoluluUSA

Personalised recommendations