Springer Nature is making SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 research free. View research | View latest news | Sign up for updates

Influence of subtle substrate differences on feeding by shorebirds on intertidal mudflats

  • 274 Accesses

  • 67 Citations

Abstract

Shallow-feeding shorebirds, dowitchers (Limnodromus griseus and L. scolopaceus), western sandpipers (Calidris mauri), dunlin (C. alpina) and American avocets (Recurvirostra americana), reduced the density of their prey in mudflats with little sand but not in mudflats with a moderate admixture of sand. An experiment in Upper Newport Bay, Southern California, during October and November 1979 to explain the difference in density is described. The effect of sand on shorebird feeding was compared in the field by measuring the times spent feeding in plots where sand had or had not been added, respectively. Increasing the sand content to 14% from 2% in the top centimeter decreased the time spent in treated plots by all species compared to adjacent untreated plots. The prey species were small polychaete and oligochaete worms (0.25 to 1.25 mm wide) similar in diameter to sand grains (0.5 to 1.0 mm). In plots where sand had been added, avocets fed by pecking at the surface in addition to scything, the more common method of feeding on muddy substrates. The results suggest that sand interferes with the detection and or capture of prey that are similar in diameter to small sand grains and explains the differences in the effects of predation by these birds seen on mudflats with a moderate admixture of sand compared to the effects on mudflats with little sand. Differential success in prey capture between one microhabitat and the nest (rather than a reduction in competition, as suggested by some authors) might explain the different use of such habitats.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Literature Cited

  1. Baker, M. C. and A. E. M. Baker: Niche relationships among six species of shorebirds on the wintering and breeding grounds. Ecol. Monogr. 43, 193–212 (1973)

  2. Bloom, S. A., J. L. Simon and V. D. Hunter: Animal-sediment relations and community analysis of a Florida estuary. Mar. Biol. 13, 43–56 (1972)

  3. Burger, J., M. A. Howe, D. C. Caldwell and J. Chase: Effects of tide cycles on habitat selection and habitat partitioning by migrating shorebirds. Auk 94, 743–758 (1977)

  4. Carter, M. A.: Thrush predation on an experimental population of the snail Cepaea nemoralis (L.). Proc. Linn. Soc. Lond. 179, 241–249 (1968)

  5. Cody, M. L.: On the methods of resource division in grassland bird communities. Am. Nat. 102, 107–147 (1968)

  6. Enders, F.: Web-site selection by orb-web spiders, particularly Argiope aurantia, Lucus. Anim. Behav. 25, 694–712 (1977)

  7. Evans, P. R., D. M. Herdson, P. J. Knights and M. W. Pienkowski: Short-term effects on reclamation of part of Seal Sands, Teesmouth, on wintering waders and shelduck. I. Shorebird diets, invertebrate densities, and the impact of predation on the invertebrates. Oecologia 41, 183–206 (1979)

  8. Folk, R. L.: Petrology of sedimentary rocks, 170 pp. Austin, Texas: Hemphill's 1968

  9. Goss-Custard, J. D.: Factors affecting the diet and feeding rate of the redshank (Tringa totanus). In: Animal populations in relation to their food resources. British Ecological Society Symposium, No. 10, pp 101–110. Ed. by A. Watson, Oxford: Blaekwell Scientific Publications 1970

  10. Goss-Custard, J. D.: Predator responses and prey mortality in redshank, Tringa totanus (L.) and a preferred prey, Corophium volutator (Pallus). J. Anim. Ecol. 46, 21–35 (1977)

  11. Hamilton, R. B.: Comparative behavior of the American avocet (Recurvirostra americana) and the black-winged stilt (Himantopus h. mexicanus), 272 pp. Unpublished Ph.D. thesis, Berkeley: University of California 1968

  12. Levinton, J.: Stability and trophic structure in deposit-feeding and suspension-feeding communities. Am. Nat. 106, 472–486 (1972)

  13. Myers, J. P., S. L. Williams and F. A. Pitelka: An experimental analysis of prey availability for sanderlings (Aves: Scolopacidae) feeding on sandy beach crustaceans. Can. J. Zool. 58, 1564–1574 (1980)

  14. Quamme, M. L.: The impact of predation by shorebirds, benthic feeding fish, and the crab, Pachygrapsus crassipes, Randell 1839 on shallow living invertebrates in intertidal mudflats of two southern California lagoons, 139 pp. Unpublished Ph.D. thesis, Irvine: University of California 1980

  15. Quammen, M. L.: Predation by shorebirds, fish and crabs on invertebrates in intertidal mudflats; an experimental test. (Inpreparation)

  16. Recher, H. F.: Some aspects of the ecology of migrating shorebirds. Ecology 47, 393–407 (1966)

  17. Rhoads, D. C. and D. K. Young: The influence of deposit-feeding organisms on sediment stability and community trophic structure. J. mar. Res. 28, 150–178 (1970)

  18. Rosenzweig, M. L. and S. Winakur: Population ecology of desert rodent communities, habitats and environmental complexity. Ecology 50, 558–572 (1969)

  19. Sale, P. F.: Pertinent stimuli for habitat selection by juvenile manini Acanthurus triostegus sandvicensis. Ecology 50, 616–623 (1969)

  20. Sanders, H. L.: Benthic studies in Buzzards Bay. I. Animal sediment relationships. Limnol. Oceanogr. 3, 245–258 (1958)

  21. Sanders, H. L.: Benthic studies in Buzzards Bay. III. The structure of the soft-bottom community. Limnol. Oceanogr. 5, 138–153 (1960)

  22. Schneider, D.: Equalization of prey number by migratory shorebirds. Nature, Lond. 271, 353–354 (1978)

  23. Schneider, D. C. and B. A. Harrington: Timing of shorebird migration in relation to prey depletion. Auk 98, 81–84 (1981)

  24. Tjallingii, S. J.: Habitat selection of the avocet (Recurvirostra avocetta) in relation to feeding. In: Proceedings of the XVth International Ornithological Congress, pp 696–697. Ed. by K. H. Voous, London: E. J. Brill 1972

  25. Wecker, S. C.: The role of early experience in habitat selection by the prairie deer mouse Peromyscos maniculatus bairdi. Ecol. Monogr. 33, 307–325 (1963)

  26. Whitlatch, R. B.: Seasonal changes in the community structure of the macrobenthos inhabiting the intertidal sand and mudflats of Barnstable Harbor, Massachusetts. Biol. Bull. mar. biol. Lab., Woods Hole 152, 275–294 (1977)

  27. Woodin, S. A.: Polychaete abundance patterns in a marine soft sediment environment: the importance of biological interactions. Ecol. Monogr. 44, 171–187 (1974)

Download references

Author information

Additional information

Communicated by N. D. Holland, La Jolla

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Quammen, M.L. Influence of subtle substrate differences on feeding by shorebirds on intertidal mudflats. Mar. Biol. 71, 339–343 (1982). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00397050

Download citation

Keywords

  • Common Method
  • Polychaete
  • Prey Species
  • Sand Content
  • Prey Capture