Planta

, Volume 175, Issue 3, pp 291–304 | Cite as

Immunocytochemical localization of cytokinins in Craigella tomato and a sideshootless mutant

  • L. Sossountzov
  • R. Maddiney
  • B. Sotta
  • I. Sabbagh
  • Y. Habricot
  • M. Bonnet
  • E. Miginiac
Article

Abstract

Post-embedding immunocytochemical techniques using peroxidase-antiperoxidase or immunoglobulin G-gold as markers were used for the localization of cytokinins (CKs) in two isogenic lines, Craigella (C) and Craigella lateral suppressor (Cls), of tomato Lycopersicon esculentum Mill. Terminal buds, nodes, hypocotyl segments and root tips were submitted to a periodate-borohydride procedure, to obtain the coupling of isopentenyladeosine and zeatin riboside to cellular proteins, followed by a fixative step with a paraformaldehyde and glutaraldehyde mixture. Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay tests performed on ovalbumin-coated microtitration plates have shown that this method was effective for CK riboside and base coupling to proteins. Paraffin-wax- or Spurr's-resin-embedded sections were cleared of wax or resin before incubation with anti-zeatin riboside or anti-isopentenyladenosine antibodies. The procedure was thoroughly investigated and many controls were done in order to eliminate artefacts. The immunostaining patterns observed along the plants showed a basipetally decreasing gradient of CKs along the stem and in the roots. Immunolabelling was higher in the actively growing regions of the stem bud and root apices. Terminal buds of Cls appeared to be less immunoreactive than C, whereas no differences were detected in root-tip immunolabelling. The staining patterns are consistent with the idea that root and bud apices have a different CK metabolism. The absence of axillary bud formation in Cls is correlated with low CK levels in the organogensis sites.

Key words

Cytokinin (PAP and immunogold localization) Lycoperiscon (mutant, cytokinin) Mutant (sideshootless tomato) 

Abbreviations

C

Craigella, isogenic line

CK

cytokinin

Cls

Craigella lateral suppressor

EDC

1-(3-dimethylaminopropyl)3-ethylcarbodiimide hydrochloride

ELISA

enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay

2iP

isopentenyladenine

2iPA

isopentenyladenosine

PAP

peroxidase-anti-peroxidase

PFAG

paraformaldehyde/glutaraldehyde mixture

Z

zeatin

ZR

zeatin riboside

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Cahill, D.M., Weste, G.M., Grant, B.R. (1986) Changes in cytokinin concentrations in xylem extrudate following infection of Eucalyptus marginata Donn ex Sm with Phytophthora cinnamomi rands. Plant Physiol. 81, 1103–1109Google Scholar
  2. Chen, C.-M., Petschow, B. (1978) Cytokinin biosynthesis in cultured rootless tobacco plants. Plant Physiol. 62, 861–865Google Scholar
  3. Childs, G.V. (1983) The use of multiple methods to validate immunocytochemical stains. J. Histochem. Cytochem. 31, 168–176Google Scholar
  4. Childs, V., Unabia, G., Ellison, D. (1986) Immunocytochemical studies of pituitary hormones with PAP, ABC, and immunogold techniques: Evolution of technology of best fit the antigen. Am. J. Anat. 175, 307–330Google Scholar
  5. De Waele, M., De Mey, J., Renmans, W., Labeur, E., Reynaert, Ph., Van Camp, B. (1986) Immunogold-silver staining of lymphocyte surface antigens on cells in suspension and in lymph node cryostat sections. J. Microsc. 143, 151–160Google Scholar
  6. Eberle, J., Wang, T.L., Cook, S., Wells, B., Weiler, E.W. (1987) Immunoassay and ultrastructural localization of isopentenyladenine and related cytokinins using monoclonal antibodies. Planta 172, 289–297Google Scholar
  7. Erlanger, B.F., Beiser, S.M. (1964) Antibodies specific for ribonucleosides and ribonucleotides and their reaction with DNA. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 52, 68–74Google Scholar
  8. Hanker, J.S., Yates, P.E., Metz, C.B., Rustioni, A. (1977) A new specific, sensitive and non carcinogenic reagent for the demonstration of horse-radish peroxidase. Histochem. J. 9, 789–792Google Scholar
  9. Holgate, C.S., Jackson, P., Cowen, P.N., Bird, C.C. (1983) Immunogold-silver staining. New method of immunostaining with enhanced sensitivity. J. Histochem. Cytochem. 31, 938–944Google Scholar
  10. Koda, Y., Okazawa, Y. (1980) Cytokinin production by Asparagus shoot apex cultured in vitro. Physiol. Plant. 49, 193–197Google Scholar
  11. Leroux, B., Maldiney, R., Miginiac, E., Sossountzov, L., Sotta, B. (1985) Comparative quantitation of abscisic acid in plant extracts by gas-liquid chromatography and an enzymelinked immunosorbent assay using the avidin-biotin systems. Planta 166, 524–529Google Scholar
  12. Letham, D.S. (1978) Cytokinins. In: Phytohormones and related compounds: a comprehensive treatise, vol. 1, pp. 205–263, Letham, D.S., Goodwin, P.B., Higgins T.V.J., eds. Elsevier/North-Holland Biomedical Press, Amsterdam Oxford New YorkGoogle Scholar
  13. Maldiney, R., Leroux, B., Sabbagh, I., Sotta, B., Sossountzov, L., Miginiac, E. (1986a) A biotin-avidin-based enzyme immunoassay to quantify three phytohormones: auxin, abscisic acid and zeatin-riboside. J. Immunol. Meth. 90, 151–158Google Scholar
  14. Maldiney, R., Pelèse, F., Pilate, G., Sotta, B., Sossountzov, L., Miginiac, E. (1986b) Endogenous levels of abscisic acid, indole-3-acetic acid, zeatin and zeatin-riboside during the course of adventitous root formation in cuttings of Craigella and Craigella lateral suppressor tomatoes. Physiol. Plant. 68, 426–430Google Scholar
  15. Mapelli, S., Lombardi, L. (1982) A comparative auxin and cytokinin study in normal and to-2 mutant tomato plants. Plant Cell Physiol. 23, 751–757Google Scholar
  16. Mazia, D., Brewer, P.A., Alfert, M. (1953) THe cytochemical staining and measurement of protein with mercuric bromphenol blue. Biol. Bull. 104, 57–67Google Scholar
  17. Palmer, M.V., Wong, O.C. (1985) Identification of cytokinins from xylem exudate of Phaseolus vulgaris L. Plant Physiol. 79, 296–298Google Scholar
  18. Palmer, M.V., Horgan, R., Wareing, P.F. (1981) Cytokinin metabolism in Phaseolus vulgaris L. Identification of endogenous cytokinins and metabolism of [8-14C]dihydrozeatin in stems of decapitated plants. Planta 153, 297–302Google Scholar
  19. Pengelly, W.L., Meins, F., Jr. (1977) A specific radioimmunoassay for nanogram quantities of the auxin, indole-3-acetic acid. Planta 136, 173–180Google Scholar
  20. Petrusz, P. (1983) Essential requirements for the validity of immunocytochemical staining procedures. J. Histochem. Cytochem. 31, 177–179Google Scholar
  21. Petrusz, P., Ordinneau, P., Finley, J.C.W. (1980) Criteria of reliability for light microscopic immunocytochemical staining. Histochem. J. 12, 333–348Google Scholar
  22. Scopsi, L., Larsson, L.I. (1985) Increased sensitivity in immunocytochemistry. Effects of double application of antibodies and of silver intensification on immunogold and peroxidase-antiperoxidase staining techniques. Histochemistry 82, 321–329Google Scholar
  23. Skene, D.S., Browning, G., Jones, H.G. (1987) Model systems for the immunolocalization of cis, trans abscisic acid in plant tissues. Planta 172, 192–199Google Scholar
  24. Sossountzov, L., Sotta, B., Maldiney, R., Sabbagh, I., Miginiac, E. (1986) Immunoelectron-microscopy localization of abscisic acid with colloidal gold on Lowicryl-embedded tissues of Chenopodium polyspermum L. Planta 168, 471–481Google Scholar
  25. Sotta, B., Pilate, G., Pelèse, F., Sabbagh, I., Bonnet, M., Maldiney, R. (1987) An avidin-biotin solid phase ELISA for femtomole isopentenyladenine and isopentenyladenosine measurements in HPLC purified plant extracts. Plant Physiol. 84, 571–573Google Scholar
  26. Sotta, B., Sossountzov, L., Maldiney, R., Sabbagh, I., Tachon, P., Miginia, E. (1985) Abscisic acid localization by light microscopic immunohistochemistry in Chenopodium polyspermum L. Effect of water stress. J. Histochem. Cytochem. 33, 201–208Google Scholar
  27. Spurr, A.R., (1969) A low viscosity epoxy resin embedding medium for electronmicroscopy. J. Ultrastruct. Res. 26, 31–43Google Scholar
  28. Sternberger, L.A., Hardy, P.H., Jr., Cuculis, J.J., Meyer, H.G. (1970) The unlabelled antibody enzyme method of immunohistochemistry. Preparation and properties of soluble antigen-antibody complex (horseradish peroxidase-anti-horseradish peroxidase) and its use in identification of Spirochetes. J. Histochem. Cytochem. 18, 315–333Google Scholar
  29. Swaab, D.F. (1982) Comments on the validity of immunocytochemical methods. In: Cytochemical methods in neuroanatomy, pp. 423–440, Palay, S.L., Chan-Palay, V., eds. A.R. Liss, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  30. Tucker, D.J. (1976) Endogenous growth regulators in relation to side shoot development in the tomato. New Phytol. 77, 561–568Google Scholar
  31. Tucker, D.J. (1977) Hormonal regulation of lateral bud growth in the tomato. Plant. Sci. Lett. 8, 105–111Google Scholar
  32. Tucker, D.J. (1979) Apical dominance in the tomato: Some further observations on isogenic lines showing varying degrees of side-shoot development. Ann. Bot. 43, 571–577Google Scholar
  33. Tucker, D.J. (1981) Axillary bud formation in two isogenic lines of tomato showing different degrees of apical dominance. Ann Bot. 48, 837–843Google Scholar
  34. Van Leeuwen, F. (1986) Pitfalls in immunocytochemistry with special reference to the specificity problems in the localization of neuropeptides. Am. J. Anat. 175, 363–377Google Scholar
  35. Weiler, E.W. (1980) Radioimmunoassays for trans-zeatin and related cytokinins. Planta 149, 155–162Google Scholar
  36. Weiler, E.W. (1984) Immunoassay of plant regulators. Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol. 35, 85–95Google Scholar
  37. Weiler, E.W., Ziegler, H. (1981) Determination of phytohormones in phloem exudate from tree species by radioimmunoassay. Planta 152, 168–170Google Scholar
  38. Yensen, J. (1968) Removal of epoxy resin from histological sections following halogenation. Stain Technol. 43, 344–346Google Scholar
  39. Zavala, M.E., Brandon, D.L. (1983) Localization of a phytohormone using immunocytochemistry. J. Cell Biol. 97, 1235–1239Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1988

Authors and Affiliations

  • L. Sossountzov
    • 1
    • 2
  • R. Maddiney
    • 1
    • 2
  • B. Sotta
    • 1
    • 2
  • I. Sabbagh
    • 1
    • 2
  • Y. Habricot
    • 1
    • 2
  • M. Bonnet
    • 1
    • 2
  • E. Miginiac
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Institut de Physiologie Végétale, CNRSUniversité P. et M. CurieParis Cedex 05France
  2. 2.Laboratoire de Physiologie Végétale, T53 E5Université P. et M. CurieParis Cedex 05France

Personalised recommendations