Environmental Monitoring and Assessment

, Volume 39, Issue 1–3, pp 417–434 | Cite as

Forest dynamics modelling under natural fire cycles: A tool to define natural mosaic diversity for forest management

  • Sylvie Gauthier
  • Alain Leduc
  • Yves Bergeron
Global to Local Modelling


In natural boreal forests, disturbances such as fire and variation in surficial deposits create a mosaic of forest stands with different species composition and age. At the landscape level, this variety of stands can be considered as the natural mosaic diversity. In this paper, we describe a model that can be used to estimate the natural diversity level of landscapes. We sampled 624 stands for tree species composition and surficial deposits in eight stand-age classes corresponding to eight fire episodes in the region of Lake Duparquet, Abitibi, Québec at the southern fringe of the Boreal Forest. For six surficial deposit types, stand composition data were used to define equations for vegetation changes with time for a chronosequence of 230 years for four forest types. Using Van Wagner's (1978) model of age class distribution of stands, the proportion of each forest type for several lengths of fire cycle were defined. Finally, for real landscapes (ecological districts) of the ecological region of the “Basses-Terres d'Amos”, the proportion of forest types were weighted by the proportion of each surficial deposit type using ecological map information. Examples of the possible uses of the model for management purposes, such as biodiversity conservation and comparisons of different landscapes in terms of diversity and sensitivity to fire regime changes, are discussed.


Forest Type Boreal Forest Biodiversity Conservation Landscape Level Forest Dynamic 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. AttiwillP.M.: 1994a, ‘The disturbance of forest ecosystems: the ecological basis for conservative management’, For. Ecol. Manage. 63, 247–300.Google Scholar
  2. AttiwillP.M.: 1994b, ‘Ecological disturbance and the conservative management of eucalypt forests in Australia’, For. Ecol. Manage. 63, 301–346.Google Scholar
  3. BakerW.L.: 1989, ‘Landscape ecology and nature reserve design in the Boundary Waters Canoe Area, Minnesota’, Ecology 70, 23–35.Google Scholar
  4. Béland, M.: 1990, ‘Le cadre écologique forestier du Québec: réalisation et applications dans un secteur de l'Abitibi’, M.Sc. Dissertation, Université du Québec à Montréal, Québec.Google Scholar
  5. BergeronY.: 1991, ‘The influence of island and mainland lakeshore landscapes on boreal forest fire regimes’, Ecology 72, 1980–1992.Google Scholar
  6. BergeronY., BouchardA., GangloffP. and CamiréC.: 1983, ‘La classification écologique des milieux forestiers de la partie ouest des cantons d'Hébécourt et de Roquemaure, Abitibi, Québec’, Etudes écologiques 9, Laboratoire d'écologie forestière, Université Laval, Québec.Google Scholar
  7. BergeronY. and BouchardA.: 1984, ‘Use of ecological groups in analysis and classification of plant communities in a section of western Québec’, Vegetatio 56, 45–63.Google Scholar
  8. BergeronY. and DansereauR.-P.: 1993, ‘Predicting the composition of Canadian southern boreal forest in different fire cycles’, J. Veg. Sci. 4, 827–832.Google Scholar
  9. BonanG.B. and ShugartH.H.: 1989, ‘Environmental factors and ecological processes in boreal forests’, Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 20, 1–28.Google Scholar
  10. Canadian Forest Service: 1993, The State of Canada's Forests 1993, Natural Resources Canada, Ottawa, Ontario.Google Scholar
  11. CarletonT.J. and MaycockP.F.: 1978, ‘Dynamics of the boreal forest south of James Bay’, Can. J. Bot. 56, 1157–1173.Google Scholar
  12. ClarkJ.S.: 1988, ‘Effects of climate change on fire regime in northwestern Minnesota’, Nature 334, 233–235.Google Scholar
  13. CogbillC.V.: 1985, ‘Dynamics of the boreal forests of the Laurentian Highlands, Canada’, Can. J. For. Res. 15, 252–261.Google Scholar
  14. DansereauR.-P. and BergeronY.: 1993, ‘Fire history in the southern boreal forest of northwestern Quebec’, Can. J. For. Res. 23, 25–32.Google Scholar
  15. EngelmarkO., KullmanL. and BergeronY.: 1994, ‘Fire and age structure of scots pine and norway spruce in northern sweden during the past 700 years’, New Phytol. 126, 163–168.Google Scholar
  16. FormanR.T.T. and GodronM.: 1986, Landscape Ecology, Wiley & Sons, New York, USA.Google Scholar
  17. FranklinJ.F.: 1993, ‘Preserving biodiversity: species, ecosystems, or landscapes’, Ecol. Appl. 3, 202–205.Google Scholar
  18. FryerG.I. and JohnsonE.A.: 1988, ‘Reconstructing fire behavior and effects in a subalpine forest’, J. Appl. Ecol. 25, 1063–1072.Google Scholar
  19. FultonM.R.: 1993, ‘Rapid simulation of vegetation stand dynamics with mixed life-forms’, In: A.M.Solomon and H.H.Shugart (eds.), Vegetation Dynamics and Global Change, Chapman & Hall, New York, pp. 251–271.Google Scholar
  20. Gauthier, S.: 1991, ‘Structure génétique et sérotinisme de populations de pin gris (Pinus banksiana Lamb.) soumises à deux régimes des feux distincts’, Ph.D. Thesis, Université de Montréal, Québec.Google Scholar
  21. HansenA.J., SpiesT.A., SwansonF.J. and OhmannJ.L.: 1991, ‘Conserving biodiversity in managed forests: lessons from natural forests’, BioScience 41, 382–392.Google Scholar
  22. HeinselmanM.L.: 1981, ‘Fire and succession in the conifer forests of northern North America’, In: D.H.West, H.H.Shugart and D.B.Botkin (eds.), Forest Succession: Concept and Applications, Springer-Verlag, New York, pp. 375–405.Google Scholar
  23. JohnsonE.A.: 1992, Fire and Vegetation Dynamics: Studies from the North American Boreal Forests, Cambridge Studies in Ecology, Cambridge University Press, New York, 129 pp.Google Scholar
  24. MladenoffD.J., WhiteM.A., PastorJ. and CrowT.R.: 1993, ‘Comparing spatial pattern in unaltered old-growth and disturbed forest landscapes’, Ecol. Appl. 3, 294–306.Google Scholar
  25. NossR.F.: 1983, ‘A regional landscape approach to maintain diversity’, BioScience 33, 700–706.Google Scholar
  26. NossR.F.: 1987, ‘Protecting natural areas in fragmented landscapes’, Natural Areas Journal 7, 2–13.Google Scholar
  27. PickettS.T.A. and WhiteP.S.: 1985, The Ecology of Natural Disturbance and Patch Dynamics, Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
  28. PimentelD., StachowU., TakacsD.A., BrubakerH.W., DumasA.R., MeaneyJ.J., O NeilJ.A.S., OnsiD.E. and CorziliusD.B.: 1991, ‘Conserving biological diversity in agricultural/forestry systems’, BioScience 42, 354–362.Google Scholar
  29. PrenticeI.C. and LeemansR.: 1990, ‘Pattern and process and the dynamics of forest structure: a simulation approach’, J. Ecol. 78, 340–355.Google Scholar
  30. RebertusA.J., BurnsB.R. and VeblenT.T.: 1991, ‘Stand dynamics of Pinus flexilis-dominated subalpine forests in the Colorado Front Range’, J. Veg. Sci. 2, 445–458.Google Scholar
  31. RobitailleA.: 1989, ‘Cartographie des districts écologiques: normes et techniques’, Ministère de l'Energie et des Ressources, Service de l'inventaire forestier, Division écologique, Québec.Google Scholar
  32. RommeW.H.: 1982, ‘Fire and landscape diversity in subalpine forests of Yellowstone National Park’, Ecol. Monogr. 52, 199–221.Google Scholar
  33. RoweJ.S.: 1972, Forest Regions of Canada, Environ. Can., Ottawa, Ontario.Google Scholar
  34. ShannonC.E.: 1948, ‘A mathematical theory of communication’, Bell System Tech. J. 27, 379–423.Google Scholar
  35. ShugartH.H.: 1984, A Theory of Forest Dynamics, The Ecological Implications of Forest Succession Models, Springer-Verlag, New York.Google Scholar
  36. SimsR.A., TowillW.D., BaldwinK.A. and WickwareG.M.: 1989, Field Guide to Forest Ecosystems Classification for Northwestern Ontario, Ont. Min. Nat. Res., Toronto, Ontario.Google Scholar
  37. StocksB.J.: 1985, ‘Forest fire behavior in spruce budworm-killed balsam fir’, In: Recent Advances in Spruce Budworm Research Proc. CANUSA Spruce Budworm Res. Symp., Sept. 16–20, 1984, Bangor, ME., Govt. Can., Can. For. Serv., Ottawa, Ontario, pp. 188–199.Google Scholar
  38. StocksB.J. and SimardA.J.: 1993, ‘Forest fire management in Canada’, J. Disaster Manage. 5, 21–27.Google Scholar
  39. TurnerM.G. and RommeW.H.: 1994, ‘Landscape dynamics in crown fire ecosystems’, Landscape Ecol. 9, 59–77.Google Scholar
  40. TurnerM.G., RommeW.H., GardnerR.H., O NeillR. and KratzT.K.: 1993, ‘A revised concept of landscape equilibrium: disturbance and stability on scaled landscapes’, Landscape Ecol. 8, 213–227.Google Scholar
  41. VanWagnerC.E.: 1978, ‘Age-class distribution and the forest fire cycle’, Can. J. For. Res. 8, 220–227.Google Scholar
  42. ViereckL.A.: 1983, ‘The effects of fire in black spruce ecosystems of Alaska and northern Canada’, In: R.W.Wein and D.A.MacLean (eds.), The Role of Fire in Northern Circumpolar Ecosystems, John Wiley & Sons, New York, pp. 201–220.Google Scholar
  43. VincentJ.S. and HardyL.: 1977, ‘L'évolution et l'extinction des lacs glaciaire Barlow and Ojibway en territoire québécois’, Géogr. Phys. Quat. 31, 357–372.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1996

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sylvie Gauthier
    • 1
  • Alain Leduc
    • 2
  • Yves Bergeron
    • 2
  1. 1.Petawawa National Forestry InstituteCanadian Forest ServiceChalk RiverCanada
  2. 2.Groupe de Recherche en Ecologie Forestière (GREF)Université du Québec à MontréalMontréalCanada

Personalised recommendations