Linking satellite and field survey data, through the use of gis, as implemented in Great Britain in the Countryside Survey 1990 project
- 58 Downloads
The Institute of Terrestrial Ecology (ITE) has been studying land use and the effects of land use on ecology for two decades. A series of national field surveys have been undertaken by the Land Use Section of ITE since 1978, the most recent being Countryside Survey 1990 (CS1990). The three-year project brought together field survey and remote sensing data which were analyzed using Geographical Information Systems (GIS). National and regional land-cover patterns were described and changes estimated.
The data collected by the field survey part of CS1990 recorded stratified samples based on a land classification. Thematic maps for surveyed 1-km squares covered physiography, agriculture and semi-natural vegetation, forestry, structures and boundaries. The same sites were surveyed in 1984 and 1990 with 14 000 digital maps produced describing both years. GIS was used to generate stock figures for each year, and overlay allowed change between survey dates to be estimated.
GIS was used to compare data collected from both field survey and satellite imagery so that both sets of information could be qualified when expressed as national figures.
This paper describes the historical development of the ITE Land Classification, examines the way in which data were collected for surveys, with particular reference to Countryside Survey 1990, and shows how satellite and field survey data can be linked through GIS.
KeywordsGeographical Information System Historical Development Geographical Information System Field Survey Stratify Sample
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- BarrC.J., BunceR.G.H., ClarkeR.T., FullerR.M., FurseM.T., GillespieM.K., GroomG.B., HallamC.J., HornungM., HowardD.C. and NessM.J.: 1993, ‘Countryside Survey 1990: main report’, Countryside 1990 Series, Dep. Environ., UK, Vol. 2, 174 pp.Google Scholar
- BarrC.J.: 1990, ‘Countryside Survey 1990 field handbook’, Institute of Terrestrial Ecology, UK, 46 pp.Google Scholar
- BarrC.J., BenefieldC.B., BunceR.G.H., RidsdaleH. and WhittakerM.: 1986, ‘Landscape changes in Britain’, Institute of Terrestrial Ecology, UK, 23 pp.Google Scholar
- Barr, C.J., Gillespie, M.K., and Howard, D.C.: 1994, ‘Hedgerow survey 1993 (Stock and change estimates of hedgerow length in England and Wales, 1990–1993)’, Report to the Dep. Environ., Institute of Terrestrial Ecology, UK, 25 pp.Google Scholar
- BunceR.G.H. and HealO.W.: 1984, ‘Landscape evaluation and the impact of changing land-use on the rural environment: the problem and an approach’, In: R.D.Roberts and T.M.Roberts (eds.), Planning and Ecology, Chapman and Hall, London, UK, pp. 164–188.Google Scholar
- Bunce, R.G.H., Howard, D.C., Clarke, R.T. and Lane, M.: 1991, ‘The ITE Land Classification: classification of all 1-km squares in GB’, Report to the Dep. Environ., Institute of Terrestrial Ecology, UK, 74 pp.Google Scholar
- FullerR.M., GroomG.B. and JonesA.R.: 1994a, ‘The LCM of Great Britain: an automated classification of Landsat Thematic Mapper data’, Photogrammetric Engineering & Remote Sensing 60, 553–562.Google Scholar
- FullerR.M., GroomG.B. and WallisS.M.: 1994b, ‘The availability of Landsat TM images for Great Britain’, International Journal of Remote Sensing 15, 1357–1362.Google Scholar
- Fuller, R.M., Jones, A.R. and Wyatt, B.K.: 1989a, ‘Remote sensing for ecological research: problem and possible solutions’, In: E.C. Barnett and K.A. Brown (eds.), Remote Sensing for Operational Applications, 15th annual Conference of the Remote Sensing Society, Reading, UK, pp. 155–164.Google Scholar
- FullerR.M., ParsellR.J., OliverM. and WyattG.: 1989b, ‘Visual and computer classifications of remotely sensed images: a case study of grasslands in Cambridgeshire’, International Journal of Remote Sensing 10, 1901–1917.Google Scholar
- FullerR.M. and ParsellR.J.: 1990, ‘Classification of TM imagery in the study of land use in lowland Britain: practical considerations for operational use’, International Journal of Remote Sensing 11, 1901–1917.Google Scholar
- Howard, D.C., Barr, C.J. and Fuller, R.M.: 1995, ‘Using GIS to link ecological information recorded from ground, air and space: examples from the Countryside 1990 project’, Journal of Biogeography 22, (in press).Google Scholar
- Howard, D.C. and Bunce, R.G.H.: 1996, ‘The Countryside Information System—a strategic level decision support system’, Environ. Monitor. and Assessm. (this volume).Google Scholar
- Prosser, M.V. and Wallace, H.L.: 1992, ‘1990 Countryside Survey: quality assurance exercise’, Report to Institute of Terrestrial Ecology, Ecological Surveys, Bangor, UK, 26 pp.Google Scholar
- Reynolds, A.E.: 1994, ‘Using GIS techniques to support siting of wind turbines: towards a quantitative estimate of the wind resources in the UK’, MA Thesis, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK, 70 pp.Google Scholar
- Scott, J.A.: 1993, ‘The potential for using a Geographical Information System to model the spread of bracken’, MSc Thesis, Department of Biology and Computer Science, University of York, UK, 99 pp.Google Scholar
- WyattB.K., Greatorex DaviesN., BunceR.G.H., FullerR.M. and HillM.O.: 1994, ‘Comparison of land cover definitions’, Countryside 1990 Series, Dep. Environ., UK, Vol. 4, 131 pp.Google Scholar