The ITE Land classification: Providing an environmental stratification of Great Britain
- 89 Downloads
The surface of Great Britain (GB) varies continuously in land cover from one area to another. The objective of any environmentally based land classification is to produce classes that match the patterns that are present by helping to define clear boundaries. The more appropriate the analysis and data used, the better the classes will fit the natural patterns. The observation of inter-correlations between ecological factors is the basis for interpreting ecological patterns in the field, and the Institute of Terrestrial Ecology (ITE) Land Classification formalises such subjective ideas. The data inevitably comprise a large number of factors in order to describe the environment adequately. Single factors, such as altitude, would only be useful on a national basis if they were the only dominant causative agent of ecological variation.
The ITE Land Classification has defined 32 environmental categories called ‘land classes’, initially based on a sample of 1-km squares in Great Britain but subsequently extended to all 240 000 1-km squares. The original classification was produced using multivariate analysis of 75 environmental variables. The extension to all squares in GB was performed using a combination of logistic discrimination and discriminant functions. The classes have provided a stratification for successive ecological surveys, the results of which have characterised the classes in terms of botanical, zoological and landscape features.
The classification has also been applied to integrate diverse datasets including satellite imagery, soils and socio-economic information. A variety of models have used the structure of the classification, for example to show potential land use change under different economic conditions. The principal data sets relevant for planning purposes have been incorporated into a user-friendly computer package, called the ‘Countryside Information System’.
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- BarrC.J., BunceR.G.H., ClarkeR.T., FullerR.M., FurseM.T., GillespieM.K., GroomG.B., HallamC.J., HornungM., HowardD.C. and NessM.J.: 1993, ‘Countryside Survey 1990 Main Report, Countryside Series 1990, Volume II’, Dep. Environ., London, UK, 174 pp.Google Scholar
- Bell, B.G., Murray, T.D., Howard, D.C. and Bunce, R.G.H.: 1989, ‘The environmental constraints on the UK resource for wind energy’, Report to the Energy Technology Support Unit, Institute of Terrestrial Ecology, Grange-over-Sands, UK, 26 pp.Google Scholar
- BestR.H.: 1981, Land Use and Living Space, Methuen, London, UK, 197 pp.Google Scholar
- BunceR.G.H.: 1978, ‘Land classification for ecological survey’, In: G.C.Barrow (ed.), The Assessment of Ecological and Recreational Resources at the Regional and National Scales, Recreation Ecology Research Group, London, UK, pp. 11–14.Google Scholar
- BunceR.G.H. and HealO.W.: 1984, ‘Landscape evaluation and the impact of changing land-use on the rural environment: the problem and an approach’, In: R.D.Roberts and T.M.Roberts (eds.), Planning and Ecology, Chapman and Hall, London, UK, pp. 164–188.Google Scholar
- BunceR.G.H. and ShawM.W.: 1973, ‘A standardised procedure for ecological survey’, Journal of Environmental Management 1, 239–258.Google Scholar
- Bunce, R.G.H., Clarke, R.T., Lane, A.M.J. and Howard, D.C.: 1991, ‘The ITE Land Classification; the classification of all squares in Great Britain’, Report to the Dep. Environ., Institute of Terrestrial Ecology, Grange-over-Sands, UK, 74 pp.Google Scholar
- CresswellP., HarrisS., BunceR.G.H. and JefferiesD.J.: 1989, ‘The badger (Meles meles) in Britain: present status and future population changes’, Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 38, 91–101.Google Scholar
- Dartington Institute: 1989, ‘Forestry on British farmland: an economic comparison’, Report to the Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food, Dartington Institute, Devon, UK, 94 pp.Google Scholar
- HarleyJ.B.: 1975, ‘Ordnance Survey maps—a descriptive manual’, Ordnance Survey, Southampton, UK, 200 pp.Google Scholar
- Harvey, D.R., Barr, C.J., Bell, M., Bunce, R.G.H., Edwards, D., Errington, A.J., Jollans, J.L., McLintock, J.H., Thompson, A.M.M. and Tranter, R.B.: 1986, ‘Countryside implications for England and Wales of possible changes in the Common Agricultural Policy’, Report to Department of the Environment and Development Commission, Centre for Agricultural Strategy, Reading, UK, 313 pp.Google Scholar
- HillM.O.: 1979, ‘TWINSPAN-A FORTRAN program for arranging multivariate data in an ordered two-way table by classification of the individuals and attributes’, Dep. of Ecology & Systematics, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York, 90 pp.Google Scholar
- HillM.O., BunceR.G.H. and ShawM.W.: 1975, ‘Indicator species analysis, a divisive polythetic method of classification, and its application to a survey of native pinewoods in Scotland’, Journal of Ecology 63, 597–613.Google Scholar
- Howard, D.C. and Bunce, R.G.H.: 1996, ‘The Countryside Information System—a strategic level decision support system’, Environ. Monitor. and Assessm. (this volume).Google Scholar
- KishL.: 1965, Survey Sampling, John Wiley and Sons, New York, 643 pp.Google Scholar
- Tranter, R.B., Jones, P.J. and Miller, F.A.: 1989a, ‘Some socio-economic characteristics of farmers and their farm businesses in Great Britain by ecological zones as characterized by the ITE Land Classification system’, Report to Dep. Environ., Centre for Agricultural Strategy, Reading, UK, 28 pp.Google Scholar
- Tranter, R.B., Tayler, R.S. and Jones, P.J.: 1989b, ‘The potential for alternative crops for agriculture with likely social, economic and ecological consequences’, Report to Dep. Environ., Centre for Agricultural Strategy, Reading, UK, 22 pp.Google Scholar
- ZonneveldI.S.: 1989, ‘The land unit—a fundamental concept in landscape ecology, and its applications’, Landscape Ecology 3, 67–86.Google Scholar