Advertisement

Antonie van Leeuwenhoek

, Volume 70, Issue 2–4, pp 243–251 | Cite as

Lactococcus lactis and stress

  • Fabien Rallu
  • Alexandra Gruss
  • Emmanuelle Maguin
Metabolism

Abstract

It is now generally recognized that cell growth conditions in nature are often suboptimal compared to controlled conditions provided in the laboratory. Natural stresses like starvation and acidity are generated by cell growth itself. Other stresses like temperature or osmotic shock, or oxygen, are imposed by the environment. It is now clear that defense mechanisms to withstand different stresses must be present in all organisms. The exploration of stress responses in lactic acid bacteria has just begun. Several stress response genes have been revealed through homologies with known genes in other organisms. While stress response genes appear to be highly conserved, however, their regulation may not be. Thus, search of the regulation of stress response in lactic acid bacteria may reveal new regulatory circuits. The first part of this report addresses the available information on stress response in Lactococcus lactis.

Acid stress response may be particularly important in lactic acid bacteria, whose growth and transition to stationary phase is accompanied by the production of lactic acid, which results in acidification of the media, arrest of cell multiplication, and possible cell death. The second part of this report will focus on progress made in acid stress response, particularly in L. lactis and on factors which may affect its regulation. Acid tolerance is presently under study in L. lactis. Our results with strain MG1363 show that it survives a lethal challenge at pH 4.0 if adapted briefly (5 to 15 minutes) at a pH between 4.5 and 6.5. Adaptation requires protein synthesis, indicating that acid conditions induce expression of newly synthesized genes. These results show that L. lactis possesses an inducible response to acid stress in exponential phase.

To identify possible regulatory genes involved in acid stress response, we determined low pH conditions in which MG1363 is unable to grow, and selected at 37°C for transposition insertional mutants which were able to survive. About thirty mutants resistant to low pH conditions were characterized. The interrupted genes were identified by sequence homology with known genes. One insertion interrupts ahrC, the putative regulator of arginine metabolism; possibly, increased arginine catabolism in the mutant produces metabolites which increase the pH. Several other mutations putatively map at some step in the pathway of (p)ppGpp synthesis. Our results suggest that the stringent response pathway, which is involved in starvation and stationary phase survival, may also be implicated in acid pH tolerance.

Key words

stress acid pH adaptation acid-resistant mutants 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Abdelal AT (1979) Arginine catabolism by microorganisms. Ann. Rev. Microbiol. 33: 139–168.Google Scholar
  2. Araya T, Ishibashi N, Shimamura S, Tanaka K & H Takahashi (1993) Genetic and molecular analysis of the rpoD gene from Lactococcus lactis. Biosci. Biotech. Biochem. 57: 88–92Google Scholar
  3. Arnau J, Sorensen KI, Appel KF, Vogensen FK & K Hammer (1996) Analysis of heat shock gene expression in Lactococcus lactis MG1363. Microbiology, 142: 1685–1691Google Scholar
  4. van Asseldonk M, Simons A, Vissier H, de Vos WM & G Simons (1993) Cloning, nucleotide sequence, and regulatory analysis of the Lactococcus dnaJ gene. J. Bacteriol. 175: 1637–1644Google Scholar
  5. Baumberg S & U Klingel (1993) Biosynthesis of arginine, proline, and related compounds. In: Bacillus subtilis and Other Gram-Positive Bacteria. pp. 299–306 In: AL Sonenshein, R Losick, JA Hoch (Eds.), ASM pressGoogle Scholar
  6. Boutibonnes P, Gillot B, Auffray Y & B Thammavongs (1991) Heat shock induces thermotolerance and inhibition of lysis in a lysogenic strain of Lactococcus lactis. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 14: 1–9Google Scholar
  7. Burland V, G PlunkettIII, DL Daniels & FR Blattner (1993) DNA sequence and analysis of 136 kilobases of the Escherichia coli genome: organizational symmetry around the origin of replication. Genomics 16: 551–561Google Scholar
  8. Cashel M & K Rudd (1987) The stringent response, pp. 1410–1438 In: FC Neidhardt, JL Ingraham, KB Low, B Maganasik, M Schaechter and HE Umbarger (Ed.), Escherichia coli and Salmonella typhimurium: Cellular and Molecular Biology, Vol. 2. American Society for Microbiology, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
  9. Casiano-Colon A & RE Marquis (1988) Role of the arginine deiminase system in protecting oral bacteria and an enzymatic basis for acid tolerance. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 54: 1318–1324Google Scholar
  10. Duwat P, SD Ehrlich & A Gruss (1995) The recA gene of Lactococcus lactis: Characterization and involvement in oxidative and thermal stress. Mol. Microbiol. 17: 1121–1131Google Scholar
  11. Duwat P, S Sourice, SD Ehrlich & A Gruss (1995) The recA gene involvement in oxidative and thermal stress in Lactococcus lactis. In “Genetics of Streptococci, Enterococci and Lactococci’. Ferretti JJ, Gilmore MS, Klaenhammer TR & Brown F (Eds.), Dev. Biol. Stand. Basel Karger, publ. Vol 85. pp 455–467Google Scholar
  12. Eaton T., C. Shearman & M. Gasson. 1993. Cloning and sequence analysis of the dnaK region of L. lactis subsp. lactis. J. Gen. Microbiol. 139: 3253–3264Google Scholar
  13. Fang FC, Libby SJ, Buchmeir NA, Loewen PC, Switala J, Harwood J & D.G. Guiney. (1992) The alternative σ factor KatF (RpoS) regulates Salmonella virulence. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 89: 11978–11982Google Scholar
  14. Foster JW & HK Hall (1991) Inducible pH homeostasis and the acid tolerance response of Salmonella typhimurium. J. Bacteriol. 173: 5129–5135Google Scholar
  15. Foster JW (1993) The acid tolerance response of Salmonella typhimurium involves transient synthesis of key acid shock proteins. J. Bacteriol. 175: 1981–1987Google Scholar
  16. Gansel X, Hartke A, Boutibonnes P & Y Auffray (1993) Nucleotide sequence of the Lactococcus lactisNCDO 763 (ML3) rpoD gene. Biochem. et Biophysica Acta 1216: 115–118Google Scholar
  17. Gasson M (1983) Plasmid complements of Streptococcus lactis NCDO712 and other lactic Streptococci after protoplast-induced curing. J. Bacteriol. 154: 1–9Google Scholar
  18. Gentry DR, Hermandez VJ, Nguyen LH, Jensen DB & M Cashel (1993) Synthesis of the stationary-phase sigma factor ss is positively regulated by ppGpp. J. Bacteriol. 175: 7982–7989Google Scholar
  19. Georgopoulos C & WJ Welch (1993) Role of the major heat shock proteins as molecular chaperones. Ann. Rev. Cell. Biol. 9: 601–634Google Scholar
  20. Hall HK, Karem KL & JW Foster (1995) Molecular responses of microbes to environmental pH stress. Adv. Microbial Physiol. 37: 229–272Google Scholar
  21. Hartke A, S Bouche, X Gansel, P Boutibonnes & Y Auffray (1994) Starvation-induced stress resistance in Lactococcus lactis subsp. lactis IL 1403. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 60: 3474–3478Google Scholar
  22. Hartke A, Giard JC, Benachour A & Y Auffray (1995) The acid-stress response of Lactococcus lactis subsp. lactis IL 1403: Changes in protein synthesis and cross-protection. 7eme Colloque du Club des Bactéries Lactiques Paris 13–15 Septembre 1995. Aff. S5Google Scholar
  23. Hartke A, Bouché S, Boutibonnes P & Y Auffray (1996) UV-inducible proteins and UV-induced Cross-protection against acid, ethanol, H2O2 or heat treatments in Lactococcus lactis subsp. lactis (submitted).Google Scholar
  24. Hecker M, Schumann W & U Völker (1996) Heat-shock and general stress response in Bacillus subtilis. Mol. Microbiol. 19: 417–428Google Scholar
  25. Hengge-Aronis R (1993) The role of rpoS in early stationary-phase gene regulation in Escherichia coli K12. pp. 171–200 In: “Starvation in Bacteria” S Kellenberg (Ed.), Plenum PressGoogle Scholar
  26. Herman C, Ogura T, Tomoyasu T, Hirage S, Akiyama Y, Ito K, Thomas R, D'Ari R & P Bouloc (1993) Cell growth and λ phage development controlled by the same essential Escherichia coli gene ftsH/hflB. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 90: 10861–10865Google Scholar
  27. Herman C, D Thévenet, R D'Ari & P Bouloc (1995) Degradation of σ32, the heat shock regulator in Escherichia coli, is governed by HflB. Proc. Natl. Sci. USA. 92: 3516–3520Google Scholar
  28. Huang DC, Novel M, Huang XF & G Novel (1992) Nonidentity between plasmid and chromosomal copies of ISS1-like sequences in Lactococcus lactis subsp. lactis CNRZ270 and their possible role in chromosomal integration of plasmid genes. Gene 118, 39–46Google Scholar
  29. Israelson H, Madsen S, Vrang A, Hansen E & E Johansen (1995) Cloning and partial characterization of regulated promoters from Lactococcus lactis Tn917-lacZ integrants with the new promoter probe vector pAK80. Appl. and Environ. Microbiol. 61: 2540–2547Google Scholar
  30. Jensen PR & K Hammer. (1993) Minimal requirements for exponential growth of Lactococcus lactis; Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 59: 4363–4366Google Scholar
  31. Kashket ER (1987) Bioenergetics of lactic acid bacteria: cytoplasmic pH and osmotolerance. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 46: 233–244Google Scholar
  32. Kellenberg S. Starvation in Bacteria. Plenum Press. The reader is referred particularly to chapters 6 through 10Google Scholar
  33. Kihara A, Akiyama Y & K Ito (1995) FtsH is required for proteolytic elimination of uncomplexed forma of Sec Y, an essential protein translocase subunit. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 92: 4532–4536Google Scholar
  34. Kim SG & CA Batt (1993) Cloning and sequencing of the Lactococcus lactis subsp. lactis groESL operon. Gene 127: 121–126Google Scholar
  35. Kolter R (1993) The stationary phase of the bacterial life cycle. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 47: 855–874Google Scholar
  36. Kunji ERS, Ubbink T, Matin A, Poolman B & WN Konings (1993) Physiological responses to Lactococcus lactis ML3 to altering conditions of growth and starvation. Arch. Microbiol. 159: 372–379Google Scholar
  37. Lange R, Fischer D & R Hengge-Aronis (1995) Identification of transcriptional start sites and the role of ppGpp in the expression of rpoS, the structural gene for the ss subunit of RNA polymerase in Escherichia coli. J. Bacteriol. 177: 4676–4680Google Scholar
  38. Law J, Buist G, Haandrikman A, Kok J, Venema G & K Leenhouts (1995) A system to generate chromosomal mutations in Lactococcus lactis which allows fast analysis of targeted genes. J. Bacteriol. 177: 7011–7018Google Scholar
  39. LeBourgeois P, Lautier M, Mata M & P Ritzenthaler (1992) New tools for the physical mapping of Lactococcus lactis strains. Gene 11: 109–114Google Scholar
  40. Lee IS, Slonczewski JL & JW Foster (1994) A low- pH-inducible, stationary-phase acid tolerance response in Salmonella typhimurium. J. Bacteriol. 176: 1422–1426Google Scholar
  41. Lee IS, J Lin, HK Hall, B Bearson & JW Foster (1995) The stationary-phase sigma factor ss (RpoS) is required for a sustained acid tolerance response in virulent Salmonella typhimurium. Mol. Microbiol. 17: 155–167Google Scholar
  42. Loewen PC & R Hengge-Aronis (1994) The role of sima factor σ8 (KatF) in bacterial global regulation. Ann. Rev. Microbiol. 48: 53–80Google Scholar
  43. Maguin E, P Duwat, T Hege, D Ehrlich & A Gruss (1992) New thermosensitive plasmid for Gram-positive bacteria. J. Bacteriol. 174: 5633–5638Google Scholar
  44. Maguin E, H Prévost, SD Ehrlich & A Gruss (1996) Efficient insertional mutagenesis in Lactococci and other Gram-positive bacteria. J. Bacteriol. 178: 931–935Google Scholar
  45. Mãntsälä P & H Zalkin (1992) Cloning and sequence of Bacillus subtilis purA and guaA, involved in the conversion of IMP to AMP and GMP. J. Bacteriol 174: 1883–1890Google Scholar
  46. Marquis RE, GR Bender, DR Murray & A Wong (1987) Arginine deiminase system and bacterial adaptation to acid environments. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 53: 198–200Google Scholar
  47. Mechold V, Steiner K, Vettermann S & H Malke (1993) Genetic organization of the streptokinase region of the Streptococcus equisimilis H46A chromosome. Mol. Gen. Genet. 241: 129–140Google Scholar
  48. Nilsson D & AA Lauridsen (1992) Isolation of purine auxotrophic mutants of Lactococcus lactis and characterization of the gene hptencoding hypoxanthine guanine phosphoribosyltransferase. Mol. Gen. Genet. 235: 359–364Google Scholar
  49. Nilsson D, AA Lauridsen, T Tomoyasu & T Ogura (1994) A Lactococcus lactis gene encodes a membrane protein with putative ATPase activity that is homologous to the essential Escherichia coli ftsH gene product. Microbiol. 140: 2601–2610Google Scholar
  50. Nystrom T (1993) Global systems approach to the physiology of the starved cell. pp. 129–150. In: “Starvation in Bacteria” S Kellenberg (Ed.), Plenum PressGoogle Scholar
  51. Parsell DA & S Lindquist (1993) The function of heat- shock proteins in stress tolerance: degradation and reactivation of damaged proteins. Ann. Rev. Genet. 27: 437–496Google Scholar
  52. Piard JC & M Desmazeaud (1991) Inhibiting factors produced by lactic acid bacteria. 1-Oxygen metabolites and catabolism end-products. Lait. 71: 525–541Google Scholar
  53. Rowbury RJ, M Goodson & AD Wallace (1992) The PhoE porin and transmission of the chemical stimulus for induction of acid resistance (acid habituation) in Escherichia coli. J. Appl. Bacteriol. 72: 233–243Google Scholar
  54. Sanders JW, Leenhouts K, Haandrikman AJ, Venema G & J Kok (1995) Stress response in Lactococcus lactis: Cloning, expression analysis, and mutation of the superoxide dismutase gene. J. Bacteriol. 177: 5254–5260Google Scholar
  55. Slonczewski JL (1992) pH-regulated genes in enteric bacteria. ASM News. 58: 140–144Google Scholar
  56. Small P, D Blankenhorn, D Welty, E Zinser & J Slonczewski (1994) Acid and base resistance in Escherichia coli and Shigella flexneri: Role of rpoS and growth pH. J. Bacteriol. 176: 1729–1737Google Scholar
  57. Spira B, Silberstein N & E Yagil (1995) Guanosine 3′, 5′-Bispyrophosphate (ppGpp) synthesis in cells of Escherichia coli starved for Pi. J. Bacteriol. 177: 4053–4058Google Scholar
  58. Ullerup A, Saxild HH & D Nilsson (1995) Regulation of Lactococcus lactis ftsH expression. 7eme Colloque du Club des Bactéries Lactiques Paris 13–15 Septembre 1995. Aff. G8Google Scholar
  59. Visick JE & S Clarke (1995) Repair, refold, recycle: how bacteria can deal with spontaneous and environmental damage to proteins. Mol. Microbiol. 16: 835–845Google Scholar
  60. Yuan G & SL Wong (1995) Isolation and characterization of Bacillus subtilis groE regulatory mutants: Evidence for orf39 in the dnaK operon as a repressor gene in regulating the expression of both groE and dnaK. J. Bacteriol. 177: 6462–6468Google Scholar
  61. Zuber U & W Schuman (1994) CIRCE, a novel heat shock element involved in regulation of heat shock operon dnaK of Bacillus subtilis. 176: 1359–1363Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1996

Authors and Affiliations

  • Fabien Rallu
    • 1
  • Alexandra Gruss
    • 1
  • Emmanuelle Maguin
    • 1
  1. 1.Laboratoire de Génétique MicrobienneInstitut National de la Recherche AgronomiqueJouy en JosasFrance

Personalised recommendations