Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology

, Volume 22, Issue 1, pp 49–59

Copulatory tactics in relation to sperm competition in Rocky Mountain bighorn sheep

  • John T. Hogg
Article

Summary

Sperm competition arises in the bighorn mating system because receptive ewes are some-times defended and mated in sequence by a series of increasingly dominant rams and because subordinate (coursing) rams commonly succeed in forcing matings with defended ewes. To identify potential components in a male strategy of sperm competition, the social circumstances and schedule of copulation among free-ranging bighorns were investigated. Three such components emerged: (i) Defending and coursing rams copulated with estrous ewes at extraordinarily high rates, presumably to increase the proportion of their own versus rivals' sperm present at fertilization by simple numerical preponderance at insemination. (ii) Coursing but not defending rams concentrated copulations later in the period of estrus (sensu this study). Evidence from domestic sheep suggests that this may correspond to the period of maximum female fertility. A greater risk and/or reduced benefit associated with forced versus cooperative copulation may force coursing rams to restrict copulation to periods of highest fertility, whereas defending rams may gain even from copulations outside this period. (iii) Defending rams copulated at unusually high rates immediately after bouts of successful coursing. Such “retaliatory” copulations were associated with reduced amounts of courtship and were more likely to occur if the defending ram had copulated infrequently recently. The number of retaliatory copulations was independent of the number of preceding forced copulations, probably because defending rams rationed ejaculates in anticipation of future coursing. The function of retaliation is not clear, although the literature on domestic sheep suggests the possibility of some form of mechanical displacement of rival sperm. Unlike females of many ungulate species, bighorn ewes were typically receptive to cooperative copulation over a period of days. Although persistent courtship by defending rams may coerce such extended receptivity, it is also possible that ewes, facing unavoidable forced matings by coursing rams, gain genotypic benefits for offspring by providing prolonged copulatory access to relatively dominant defending rams.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Abele LG, Gilchrist S (1977) Homosexual rape and sexual selection in acanthocephalan worms. Science 197:81–83Google Scholar
  2. Altmann J (1974) The observational study of behaviour: sampling methods. Behaviour 49:227–267Google Scholar
  3. Amir D, Schindler H (1972) Conception rate of ewes after artificial insemination at different times during estrus. J Reprod Fert 28:261–264Google Scholar
  4. Anderson JL (1980) The social organisation and aspects of behaviour of the nyala Tragelaphus angasi Gray, 1849. Z Säugetierk 45:90–123Google Scholar
  5. Asdell SA (1964) Patterns of mammalian reproduction, 2nd ed. Cornell University Press, IthacaGoogle Scholar
  6. Bedford JM (1970) Sperm transport, capacitation and fertilization. In: Balin H, Glasser S (eds) Reproductive biology. Excerpta Medica, Amsterdam, pp 338–392Google Scholar
  7. Bergerud AT (1974) Rutting behaviour in Newfoundland caribou. In: Geist V, Walther FR (eds) The behaviour of ungulates and its relation to management. IUCN, Morges, pp 395–435Google Scholar
  8. Cheng KM, Burns JT, McKinney F (1983) Forced copulation in captive mallards. III Sperm competition. Auk 100:302–310Google Scholar
  9. Clutton-Brock TH, Guinness FF, Albon SD (1982) Red deer: behavior and ecology of two sexes. University of Chicago Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  10. Colas G, Courot M (1979) Storage of ram semen. In: Tomes GL, Robertson DE, Lightfoot RJ (eds) Sheep breeding. Butterworths, London, pp 521–532Google Scholar
  11. Devine MC (1975) Copulatory plugs in snakes: enforced chastity. Science 187:844–845Google Scholar
  12. Devine MC (1977) Copulatory plugs, restricted mating opportunities and reproductive competition among male garter snakes. Nature 267:345–346Google Scholar
  13. Devine MC (1984) Potential for sperm competition in reptiles: behavioral and physiological consequences. In: Smith RL (ed) Sperm competition and the evolution of animal mating systems. Academic Press, Orlando, pp 509–521Google Scholar
  14. Dewsbury DA (1982) Ejaculate cost and male choice. Am Nat 119:601–610Google Scholar
  15. Dewsbury DA (1984) Sperm competition in muroid rodents. In: Smith RL (ed) Sperm competition and the evolution of animal mating systems. Academic Press, Orlando, pp 547–571Google Scholar
  16. Dewsbury DA (1985) Interactions between males and their sperm during multimale copulatory episodes of deer mice (Peromyscus maniculatus). Anim Beh 33:1266–1274Google Scholar
  17. Dewsbury DA, Hartung TG (1980) Copulatory behavior and differential reproduction of laboratory rats in a two-male, one-female competitive situation. Anim Beh 28:92–102Google Scholar
  18. Dziuk P (1970) Estimation of optimum time for insemination of gilts and ewes by double-mating at certain times relative to ovulation. J Reprod Fert 22:277–282Google Scholar
  19. Estes RD (1972) The role of the vomeronasal organ in mammalian reproduction. Mammalia 36:315–341Google Scholar
  20. Geist V (1971) Mountain sheep: a study in behavior and evolution. University of Chicago Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  21. Grubb P, Jewell PA (1973) The rut and the occurrence of oestus in the Soay sheep on St Kilda. J Reprod Fert, Suppl 19:491–502Google Scholar
  22. Harcourt AH, Harvey PH, Larson SG, Short RV (1981) Testis weight, body weight and breeding system in primates. Nature 293:55–57Google Scholar
  23. Hogg JT (1984) Mating in bighorn sheep: multiple creative male strategies. Science 225:526–529Google Scholar
  24. Hogg JT (1987) Intrasexual competition and mate choice in Rocky Mountain bighorn sheep. Ethology 75:119–144Google Scholar
  25. Jewell PA, Hall SJG, Rosenberg MM (1986) Multiple mating and siring success during natural oestrus in the ewe. J Reprod Fert 77:81–89Google Scholar
  26. Jones RC, Martin ICA, Lapwood KR (1969) Studies of artificial insemination of sheep: the effects on fertility of diluting ram semen, stage of estrus of the ewe at insemination, and injection of synthetic oxytocin. Aust J Agric Res 20:141–150Google Scholar
  27. Kitchen DW (1974) Social behavior and ecology of the pronghorn. Wildl Monogr 38:1–96Google Scholar
  28. Knight TW (1984) Testicular growth and size in rams from flocks with different reproductive potential. NZ J Agri Res 27:179–187Google Scholar
  29. Lanier DL, Estep DQ, Dewsbury DA (1979) Role of prolonged copulatory behavior in facilitating reproductive success in a competitive mating situation in laboratory rats. J Comp Physiol Psychol 93:781–792Google Scholar
  30. Lott DF (1981) Sexual behaviour and intersexual strategies in American bison. Z Tierpsychol 56:97–114Google Scholar
  31. Martin PA, Reimers TJ, Lodge JR, Dziuk PJ (1974) The effect of ratios and numbers of spermatozoa mixed from two males on proportions of offspring. J Reprod Fert 39:251–258Google Scholar
  32. Matthews MK, Adler NT (1977) Facilitative and inhibitory influences of reproductive behavior on sperm transport in rats. J Comp Physiol Psychol 91:727–741Google Scholar
  33. Matthews MK, Adler NT (1978) Systematic interrelationship of mating, vaginal plug position, and sperm transport in the rat. Physiol Behav 20:303–309Google Scholar
  34. Matthews MK, Adler NT (1979) Relative efficiency of sperm transport and number of sperm ejaculated in the female rat. Biol Reprod 20:540–544Google Scholar
  35. Mattner PE (1963) Spermatozoa in the genital tract of the ewe. II Distribution after coitus. Aust J Biol Sci 16:688–694Google Scholar
  36. Mattner PE, Braden WH (1963) Spermatozoa in the genital tract of the ewe. I Rapidity of transport. Aust J Biol Sci 16:473–481Google Scholar
  37. Owen-Smith RN (1975) The social ethology of the white rhinoceros Ceratotherium simum (Burchell 1817). Z Tierpsychol 38:337–384Google Scholar
  38. Parker GA (1970) Sperm competition and its evolutionary consequences in the insects. Biol Rev 45:525–567Google Scholar
  39. Parker GA (1973) Courtship persistence and female-guarding as male time investment strategies. Behaviour 48:157–183Google Scholar
  40. Parker GA (1984) Sperm competition and the evolution of animal mating strategies. In: Smith RL (ed) Sperm competition and the evolution of animal mating systems. Academic Press, Orlando, pp 2–60Google Scholar
  41. Parker GA, Smith JL (1975) Sperm competition and the evolution of the precopulatory passive phase behavior in Locusta migratoria migratorioides. J Ent 49:155–171Google Scholar
  42. Parsons SD, Hunter GL (1967) Effect of the ram on duration of oestrus in the ewe. J Reprod Fert 14:61–70Google Scholar
  43. Raynaud F (1972) Physiologie du transport des spermatozoides dans le col uterin de la brebis dans diverses conditions experimentales. Thèse, 3ème cycle, ParisGoogle Scholar
  44. Robinson TJ (1973) Factors involved in the failure of sperm transport and survival in the female reproductive tract. J Reprod Fert, Suppl 18:103–109Google Scholar
  45. Saacke RG, Vinson WE, O'Connor ML, Chandler JE, Mullins J, Amann RP, Marshall CE, Wallace RA, Vincel WN, Kellgren HC (1980) The relationship of semen quality and fertility: a heterospermic study. Proc VIII Tech Conf Artif Insem Reprod NAAB, pp 71–78Google Scholar
  46. Schindler H, Amir D (1972) Length of oestrus, duration of phenomena related to oestrus, and ovulation time in the local fat-tailed Awassi ewe. J Agric Sci 78:151–156Google Scholar
  47. Schindler H, Amir D (1973) Conception rate of ewes in relation to sperm dose and time of insemination. J Reprod Fert 34:191–196Google Scholar
  48. Smith RL (1979) Repeated copulation and sperm precedence: paternity assurance for a male brooding waterbug. Science 205:1029–1031Google Scholar
  49. Smith RL (1984) Human sperm competition. In: Smith RL (ed) Sperm competition and the evolution of animal mating systems. Academic Press, Orlando, pp 601–659Google Scholar
  50. Sokal RR, Rohlf FJ (1981) Biometry, 2nd ed. Freeman, San Francisco, pp 704–709Google Scholar
  51. Thibault C (1973) Sperm transport and storage in vertebrates. J Reprod Fert, Suppl 18:39–53Google Scholar
  52. Trimberger GW, Davis HP (1943) Conception rate in dairy cattle by artificial insemination at various stages of oestrus. Res Bull Neb Agri Exp Stn 129:1–14Google Scholar
  53. Waage JK (1979) Dual function of the damselfly penis: sperm removal and transfer. Science 203:916–918Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1988

Authors and Affiliations

  • John T. Hogg
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of ZoologyUniversity of MontanaMissoulaUSA
  2. 2.Craighead Wildlife-Wildlands Institute, Inc.MissoulaUSA

Personalised recommendations