Advertisement

Marine Biology

, Volume 47, Issue 2, pp 177–189 | Cite as

Studies on the functional role of tintinnids in the Southern California Bight. I. Grazing and growth rates in laboratory cultures

  • J. F. Heinbokel
Article

Abstract

Five species of tintinnids, Amphorella quadrilineata (Claparède and Lachmann, 1858), Tintinnopsis cf. beroidea Stein (1867), T. cf. acuminata Daday (1887), Eutintinnus pectinis (Kofoid and Campbell, 1929), and Helicostomella subulata (Ehrenberg, 1833), were isolated from Southern California coastal waters and maintained in laboratory cultures which were used to investigate, several aspects of the feeding dynamics and population growth rates of this group of planktonic ciliates. Data are most complete for the latter three species. Both E. pectinis and H. subulata displayed ingestion and growth rates which increased with increasing food concentration until a maximum rate was obtained which then remained essentially constant as food levels increased further. Maximum hourly ingestion was equivalent to approximately 10 to 20% of the body weight of the tintinnids. T. cf. acuminata showed no such maximum ingestion rate, as ingestion rates increased throughout the entire range of food concentrations used. The dependence of growth rate of T. cf. acuminata on food concentration also differed from the other species, being characterized by a broad region of maximum growth at intermediate food levels with reduced growth at both lower and higher food concentrations. Maximum observed growth rates represented doubling times of approximately 12 h for both E. pectinis and T. cf. acuminata and 24 h for H. subulata. The data suggested gross growth efficiencies exceeding 50% over much of the range of food concentrations used. No strong evidence supporting the existence of feeding thresholds or “switching” behavior was collected during these experiments, although apparently selective feeding was observed in one experiment with E. pectinis.

Keywords

Food Concentration Ingestion Rate Food Level Population Growth Rate Laboratory Culture 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literature Cited

  1. Beers, J.R., F.M.H. Reid and G.L. Stewart: Microplankton of the North Pacific Central Gyre. Population structure and abundance, June, 1973. Int. Revue ges. Hydrobiol. 60, 607–638 (1975)Google Scholar
  2. —, M.R. Stevenson, R.W. Eppley and E.R. Brooks: Plankton populations and upwelling off the coast of Peru, June 1969. Fish. Bull. U.S. 69, 859–876 (1971)Google Scholar
  3. — and G.L. Stewart: Micro-zooplankton in the euphotic zone at five locations across the California Current. J. Fish. Res. Bd Can. 24, 2053–2068 (1967)Google Scholar
  4. ——: The ecology of the plankton off La Jolla, California, in the period April through September, 1967. Part VI. Numerical abundance and estimated biomass of microzooplankton. Bull. Scripps Instn Oceanogr. (New Ser.) 17, 67–87 (1970)Google Scholar
  5. ——: Micro-zooplankters in the plankton communities of the upper waters of the eastern tropical Pacific. Deep-Sea Res. 18, 861–883 (1971)Google Scholar
  6. Blackbourn, D.J.: The feeding biology of tintinnid Protozoa and some other inshore microzooplankton, 224 pp. Ph.D. Thesis, University of British Columbia 1974Google Scholar
  7. Caperon, J.: Population growth in micro-organisms limited by food supply. Ecology 48, 715–722 (1967)Google Scholar
  8. Corner, E.D.S., R.N. Head and C.C. Kilvington: On the nutrition and metabolism of zooplankton. VIII. The grazing of Biddulphia cells by Calanus helgolandicus. J. mar. biol. Ass. U.K. 52, 847–861 (1972)Google Scholar
  9. ———: and L. Pennycuick: On the nutrition and metabolism of zooplankton. X. Quantitative aspects of Calanus helgolandicus feeding as a carnivore. J. mar. biol. Ass. U.K. 56, 345–358 (1976)Google Scholar
  10. Curds, C.R. and A. Cockburn: Studies on the growth and feeding of Tetrahymena pyriformis in axenic and monoxenic culture. J. gen. Microbiol. 54, 343–358 (1968)Google Scholar
  11. ——: Continuous monoxenic culture of Tetrahymena puriformis. J. gen. Microbiol. 66, 95–108 (1971)Google Scholar
  12. Eppley, R.W., R.H. Holmes and J.D.H. Strickland: Sinking rates of marine phytoplankton measured with a fluorometer. J. exp. mar. Biol. Ecol. 1, 191–208 (1967)Google Scholar
  13. Fenchel, T.: The ecology of marine microbenthos. III. The reproductive potential of ciliates. Ophelia 5, 123–136 (1968)Google Scholar
  14. —: Intrinsic rate of natural increase: the relationship with body size. Oecologia 14, 317–326 (1974)Google Scholar
  15. Frost, B.W.: Effects of size and concentration of food particles on the feeding behavior of the marine planktonic copepod Calanus pacificus. Limnol. Oceanogr. 17, 805–815 (1972)Google Scholar
  16. —: A threshold feeding behavior in Calanus pacificus. Limnol. Oceanogr. 20, 263–266 (1975)Google Scholar
  17. Gold, K.: Some observations on the biology of Tintinnopsis sp. J. Protozool. 15, 193–194 (1968)Google Scholar
  18. —: Methods for growing Tintinnida in continuous culture. Am. Zool. 13, 203–208 (1973)Google Scholar
  19. Hamilton, R.D. and J.E. Preslan: Observations on the continuous culture of a planktonicphagotrophic protozoan. J. exp. mar. Biol. Ecol. 5, 94–104 (1970)Google Scholar
  20. Heal, O.W.: Quantitative studies on soil amoeba. In: Progress in soil biology, pp 120–126. Ed. by O. Graff and J.E. Satchel. Amsterdam: North Holland Publishing Co. 1967Google Scholar
  21. Hirota, J.: Laboratory culture and metabolism of the planktonic ctenophore, Pleurobrachia bachei A. Agassiz. In: Biological oceanography of the Northern North Pacific Ocean, pp 465–484. Ed. by A.Y. Takenouti et al. Tokyo: Idemitsu Shoten 1972Google Scholar
  22. Johannes, R.E.: Influence of marine Protozoa on nutrient regeneration. Limnol. Oceanogr. 10, 434–442 (1965)Google Scholar
  23. Landry, M.R.: A review of important concepts in the trophic organization of pelagic ecosystems. Helgoländer wiss. Meeresunters. 30, 8–17 (1977)Google Scholar
  24. Marshall, S.M.: Respiration and feeding in copepods. Adv. mar. Biol. 11, 57–120 (1973)Google Scholar
  25. Millin, M.M. and E.R. Brooks: Laboratory culture, growth rate, and feeding behavior of a planktonic marine copepod. Limnol. Oceanogr. 12, 657–666 (1967)Google Scholar
  26. —, E.F. Stewart and F.J. Fuglister: Ingestion by planktonic grazers as a function of concentration of food. Limnol. oceanogr. 20, 259–262 (1975)Google Scholar
  27. Murdoch, W.W. and A. Oaten: Predation and population stability. Adv. ecol. Res. 9, 1–131 (1975)Google Scholar
  28. Nival, P. and S. Nival: Particle retention efficiencies of an herbivorous copepod, Acartia clausi (adult and copepodite states): effects on grazing. Limnol. Oceanogr. 21, 24–38 (1976)Google Scholar
  29. Petipa, T.S., E.V. Pavlova and G.N. Mironov: The food web structure, utilization and transport of energy by trophic levels in the planktonic communities. In: Marine food chains, pp 142–167. Ed. by J.H. Steele. Edinburgh: Oliver & Boyd 1970Google Scholar
  30. Proper, G. and J.C. Garver: Mass culture of the protozoa Colpoda steinii. Biotechnol. Bioengng 8, 287–296 (1966)Google Scholar
  31. Reid, F.M.H., E. Fuglister and J.B. Jordan: The ecology of the plankton off La Jolla, California, in the period April through September, 1967. Part V. Phytoplankton taxonomy and standing crop. Bull. Scripps Instn Oceanogr. (New Ser.) 17, 51–66 (1970)Google Scholar
  32. Reeve, M.R.: Feeding of zooplankton, with special reference to some experiments with Sagitta. Nature, Lond. 201, 211–213 (1964)Google Scholar
  33. Rigler, F.H.: Zooplankton. In: A manual on methods for the assessment of secondary productivity in fresh waters, pp 228–255. Ed. by W.T. Edmondson and G.G. Winberg. Oxford: Blackwell Scientific Publishers 1971. (I.B.P. Handbook No. 17)Google Scholar
  34. Rudzinska, M.A.: The influence of amount of food on the reproduction rate and longevity of a suctorian (Toxophora infusionum). Science, N.Y. 113, 10–11 (1951)Google Scholar
  35. Sharp, J.H.: Improved analysis for “particulate” organic carbon and nitrogen from seawater. Limnol. Oceanogr. 19, 984–989 (1974)Google Scholar
  36. Solomon, M.E.: The natural control of animal populations. J. Anim. Ecol. 18, 1–35 (1949)Google Scholar
  37. Spittler, P.: Feeding experiments with tintinnids. Oikos (Suppl.) 15, 128–132 (1973)Google Scholar
  38. Steele, J.H.: The structure of marine ecosystems, 128 pp. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press 1974Google Scholar
  39. Vitiello, P.: Contribution à l'étude des tintinnides de la baie d'Alger. Pélagos 2, 5–41 (1964)Google Scholar
  40. Zaika, V.Ye. and N.A. Ostrovskaya: Pattern of diurnal variations in microzooplankton abundance in the surface layer of the Mediterranean Sea. Oceanology 12, 725–729 (1972)Google Scholar
  41. Zeuthen, E.: Body size and metabolic rate in the animal kingdom with special regard to the marine microfauna. C.r. Trav. Lab. Carlsberg (Sér. chim.) 26, 17–161 (1947)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1978

Authors and Affiliations

  • J. F. Heinbokel
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Scripps Institution of OceanographyUniversity of California, San DiegoLa JollaUSA
  2. 2.Chesapeake Bay InstituteThe Johns Hopkins UniversityBaltimoreUSA

Personalised recommendations