Environmental Monitoring and Assessment

, Volume 18, Issue 2, pp 105–122

Trace elements and organochlorines in surf scoters from San Francisco Bay, 1985

  • Harry M. Ohlendorf
  • Katherine C. Marois
  • Roy W. Lowe
  • Thomas E. Harvey
  • Paul R. Kelly
Article

Abstract

Surf scoters (Melanitta perspicillata) were collected from 6 locations in San Francisco Bay during January and March 1985. Overall, mean concentrations of cadmium and zinc were higher in livers of scoters from the southern region of the Bay, whereas mean iron and lead were higher in those from the northern Bay region. Mean concentrations of arsenic, copper, lead, zinc, aluminum (January only) and iron (January) also differed among individual locations. Mean concentrations of copper and zinc increased, arsenic decreased, and cadmium remained the same between January and March. Selenium and mercury concentrations in scoter livers were not significantly correlated (P>0.05), but cadmium concentrations in livers and kidneys were positively correlated (P<0.0001), and body weight was negatively related to mercury concentration in the liver (P<0.05). Body weight differed among locations but not between January and March. Body weight was correlated with lipid content (P<0.0001). DDE and PCBs were each detected in 34 of 36 scoter carcasses. DDE increased significantly between January and March at Richmond Harbor, but BCBs did not differ between January and March at the 3 locations that could be tested.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bellrose, F. C.: 1980, Ducks, Geese & Swans of North America, Stackpole Books, Harrisburg, PA. 540 pp.Google Scholar
  2. Blomqvist, S., Frank, A., and Petersson, L. R.: 1987, ‘Metals in Liver and Kidney Tissues of Autumn-migrating Dunlin Calidris alpina and Curlew Sandpiper Calidris ferruginea Staging at the Baltic Sea’, Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 35, 1–13.Google Scholar
  3. Chappell, W. A. and Titman, R. D.: 1983, ‘Estimating Reserve Lipids in Greater Scaup (Aythya marila) and Lesser Scaup (A. affinis)’, Can. J. Zool. 61, 35–38.Google Scholar
  4. Cromartie, E., Reichel, W. L., Locke, L. N., Belisle, A. A., Kaiser, T. E., Lamont, T. G., Mulhern, B. M., Prouty, R. M., and Swineford, D. M.: 1975, ‘Residues of Organochlorine Pesticides and Polychlorinated Biphenyls and Autopsy Data for Bald Eagles, 1971–72’, Pestic. Monit. J. 9, 11–14.Google Scholar
  5. Di, Giulio, R. T. and Scanlon, P. F.: 1984, ‘Heavy Metals in Tissues of Waterfowl from the Chesapeake Bay, U.S.A.’, Environ. Pollut. (Ser. A) 35, 29–48.Google Scholar
  6. Di, Giulio, R. T. and Scanlon, P. F.: 1985, ‘Effects of Cadmium Ingestion and Food Restriction on Energy Metabolism and Tissue Metal Concentrations in Mallard Duck (Anas platyrhynchos)’, Environ. Res. 37, 433–444.Google Scholar
  7. Draper, N. R. and Smith, H.: 1981, Applied Regression Analysis, Second Edition, John Wiley & Sons, Inc. New York, 709 pp.Google Scholar
  8. Eisler, R.: 1985, ‘Cadmium Hazards to Fish, Wildlife, and Invertebrates: A Synoptic Review’, U.S. Fish and Wildl. Serv. Biol. Rep. 85 (1.2), 46 pp.Google Scholar
  9. Eisler, R.: 1988, ‘Arsenic Hazards to Fish, Wildlife, and Invertebrates: A Synoptic Review’, U.S. Fish and Wildl. Serv. Biol. Rep. 85 (1.12), 92 pp.Google Scholar
  10. Eisler, R.: 1989, ‘Tin Hazards to Fish, Wildlife, and Invertebrates: A Synoptic Review’, U.S. Fish and Wildl. Serv. Biol. Rep. 85 (1.15), 83 pp.Google Scholar
  11. Fimreite, N.: 1971, ‘Effects of Dietary Methylmercury on Ring-necked Pheasants’, Canadian Wildl. Serv. Occasional Paper No. 9, 39 pp.Google Scholar
  12. Finley, M. T. and Stendell, R. C.: 1978, ‘Survival and Reproductive Success of Black Ducks fed Methyl Mercury’, Environ. Pollut. 16, 51–64.Google Scholar
  13. Frank, A.: 1986, ‘In Search of Biomonitors for Cadmium: Cadmium Content of Wild Swedish Fauna During 1973–1976’, Sci. Total Environ. 57, 57–65.Google Scholar
  14. Furness, R. and Hutton, M.: 1979, ‘Pollutant Levels in the Great Skua Catharacta skua’, Environ. Pollut. 19, 261–268.Google Scholar
  15. Gardiner, E. E., Hironaka, R., and Slen, S. B.: 1971, ‘Growth, Feed Efficiency and Levels of Mercury in Tissues of Two Breeds of Chickens Fed Methyl Mercury Dicyandiamide’, Can. J. Anim. Sci. 51, 657–662.Google Scholar
  16. Goede, A. A.: 1985, ‘Mercury, Selenium, Arsenic and Zinc in Waders from the Dutch Wadden Sea’, Environ. Pollut. (Ser. A) 37, 287–309.Google Scholar
  17. Haarakangas, H., Hyvarinen, H., and Ojanen, M.: 1974, ‘Seasonal Variations and the Effects of Nesting and Moulting on Liver Mineral Content in the House Sparrow (Passer domesticus L.)’, Comp. Biochem. Physiol. 47A, 153–163.Google Scholar
  18. Hayes, S. P. and Phillips, P. T.: 1985, ‘California State Mussel Watch Marine Water Quality Monitoring Program 1984–84’, Water Quality Monitoring Report No. 85-3 WQ, California State Water Resources Control Board, Sacramento, CA.Google Scholar
  19. Hayes, S. P. and Phillips, P. T.: 1986, ‘California State Mussel Watch Marine Water Quality Monitoring Program 1984–85’, Water Quality Monitoring Report No. 86-3 WQ, California State Water Resources Control Board, Sacramento, CA.Google Scholar
  20. Hayes, S. P. and Phillips, P. T.: 1987, ‘California State Mussel Watch Marine Water Quality Monitoring Program 1985–86’, Water Quality Monitoring Report No. 87-2 WQ, California State Water Resources Control Board, Sacramento, CA.Google Scholar
  21. Heinz, G. H.: 1976, ‘Methylmercury: Second-year Feeding Effects on Mallard Reproduction and Duckling Behavior’, J. Wildl. Manage, 40, 82–90.Google Scholar
  22. Heinz, G. H.: 1979, ‘Methylmercury: Reproductive and Behavioral Effects on Three Generations of Mallard Ducks’, J. Wildl. Manage, 43, 394–401.Google Scholar
  23. Heinz, G. H., Pendleton, G. W., Krynitsky, A. J., and Gold, L. G.: 1990, ‘Selenium Accumulation and Elimination in Mallards’, Arch. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 19 (in press).Google Scholar
  24. Hutton, M.: 1981, ‘Accumulation of Heavy Metals and Selenium in Three Seabird Species from the United Kingdom’, Environ. Pollut. (Ser. A) 26, 129–145.Google Scholar
  25. Jenkins, D. W.: 1980, ‘Toxic Trace Metals in Plants and Animals of the World’, Parts I and III, in Biological Monitoring of Toxic Trace Metals, Vol. 2, U.S. Environ. Protection Agency Rep. 600/3-80-090 and 600/3-80-092, Las Vegas, NV.Google Scholar
  26. Kaiser, T. E., Reichel, W. L., Locke, L. N., Cromartie, E., Krynitsky, A. J., Lamont, T. G., Mulhern, B. M., Prouty, R. M., Stafford, C. J., and Swineford, D. M.: 1980, ‘Organochlorine Pesticide, PCB, PBB Residues and Necropsy Data for Bald Eagles from 29 States — 1975–77’, Pestic. Monit. J. 13, 145–149.Google Scholar
  27. Lande, E.: 1977, ‘Heavy Metal Pollution in Trondheimsfjorden, Norway, and the Recorded Effects on the Fauna and Flora’, Environ. Pollut. 12, 187–198.Google Scholar
  28. Leonzio, C., Fossi, C., and Focardi, S.: 1986a, ‘Lead, Mercury, Cadmium and Selenium in Two Species of Gull Feeding on Inland Dumps, and in Marine Areas’, Sci. Total Environ. 57, 121–127.Google Scholar
  29. Leonzio, C., Fossi, C., and Focardi, S.: 1986b, ‘Heavy Metals and Selenium Variation in a Migratory Bird Wintering in a Mercury-Polluted Lagoon’, Bull. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 37, 219–225.Google Scholar
  30. Neter, J. and Waserman, W.: 1974, ‘Applied Linear Statistical Models’, Richard D. Irwin, Inc., Homewood, IL, 842 pp.Google Scholar
  31. Ohlendorf, J. M. and Miller, M. R.: 1984, ‘Organochlorine Contaminants in California Waterfowl’, J. Wildl. Manage. 48, 867–877.Google Scholar
  32. Ohlendorf, H. M. and Harrison, C. S.: 1986, ‘Mercury, Selenium, Cadmium and Organochlorines in Eggs of Three Hawaiian Seabird Species’, Environ. Pollut. (Ser. B) 11, 169–191.Google Scholar
  33. Ohlendorf, H. M., Hoffman, D. J., Saiki, M. K., and Aldrich, T. W.: 1986a, ‘Embryonic Mortality and Abnormalities of Aquatic Birds: Apparent Impacts of Selenium from Irrigation Drainwater’, Sci. Total Environ. 52, 49–63.Google Scholar
  34. Ohlendorf, H. M., Hothem, R. L., Bunck, C. M., Aldrich, T. W., and Moore, J. F.: 1986b, ‘Relationships Between Selenium Concentrations and Avian Reproduction’, Trans. N. Am. Wildl. Nat. Resour. Conf. 51, 330–342.Google Scholar
  35. Ohlendorf, H. M., Lowe, R. W., Kelly, P. R., and Harvey, T. E.: 1986c, ‘Selenium and Heavy Metals in San Francisco Bay Diving Ducks’, J. Wildl. Manage. 50, 64–71.Google Scholar
  36. Ohlendorf, H. M. and Fleming, W. J.: 1988, ‘Birds and Environmental Contaminants in San Francisco and Chesapeake Bays’, Mar. Pollut. Bull. 19, 487–495.Google Scholar
  37. Ohlendorf, H. M., Kilness, A. W., Simmons, J. L., Stroud, R. K., Hoffman, D. J., and Moore, J. F.: 1988, ‘Selenium Toxicosis in Wild Aquatic Birds’, J. Toxicol. Environ. Health 24, 67–92.Google Scholar
  38. Ohlendorf, H. M., Marois, K. C., Lowe, R. W., Harvey, T. E., and Kelly, P. R.: 1989, ‘Environmental Contaminants and Diving Ducks in San Francisco Bay’, in Howard, A. Q. (ed.), Selenium and Agricultural Drainage: Implications for San Francisco Bay and the California Environment, Proceedings of the Fourth Selenium Symposium, Berkeley, CA, March 21, 1987. The Bay Institute of San Francisco, Sausalito, CA, pp. 60–69.Google Scholar
  39. Osborn, D.: 1979, ‘Seasonal Changes in the Fat, Protein and Metal Content of the Liver of the Starling Sturnus vulgaris’, Environ. Pollut. 19, 145–155.Google Scholar
  40. Parslow, J. L. F., Thomas, G. J., and Williams, T D.: 1982, ‘Heavy Metals in the Livers of Waterfowl from the Ouse Washes, England’, Environ. Pollut. (Ser. A) 29, 317–327.Google Scholar
  41. Presser, T. S. and Ohlendorf, H. M.: 1987, ‘Biogeochemical Cycling of Selenium in the San Joaquin Valley, California, USA’, Environ. Manage. 11, 805–821.Google Scholar
  42. Renzoni, A., Focardi, S., Fossi, C., Leonzio, C., and Mayol, J.: 1986, ‘Comparison Between Concentrations of Mercury and Other Contaminants in Eggs and Tissues of Cory's Shearwater Calonectris diomedea Collected on Atlantic and Mediterranean Islands’, Environ. Pollut. (Ser. A) 40, 17–35.Google Scholar
  43. Scheuhammer, A. M.: 1987, ‘The Chronic Toxicity of Aluminium, Cadmium, Mercury, and Lead in Birds: A Review’, Environ. Pollut. 46, 263–295.Google Scholar
  44. Serie, J. R. and Sharp, D. E.: 1989, ‘Body Weight and Composition Dynamics of Fall Migrating Canvasbacks’, J. Wildl. Manage. 53, 431–441.Google Scholar
  45. Sokal, R. R. and Rohlf, F. J.: 1981, Biometry, 2nd ed. W. H. Freeman and Co., New York, 859 pp.Google Scholar
  46. Stickel, L. F.: 1973, ‘Pesticide Residues in Birds and Mammals’, in Edwards, C.A. (ed.), Environmental Pollution by Pesticides, Plenum Press, New York, pp. 254–312.Google Scholar
  47. Stickel, L. F., Stickel, W. H., McLane, M. A. R., and Bruns, M.: 1977, ‘Prolonged Retention of Methyl Mercury by Mallard Drakes’, Bull. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 18, 393–400.Google Scholar
  48. Tejning, S.: 1967, ‘Biological Effects of Methyl Mercury Dicyandiamide-treated Grain in the Domestic Fowl Gallus gallus L.’, I. Studies on food consumption, egg production and general health, Oikos Suppl. 8, 7–17.Google Scholar
  49. Vermeer, K. and Peakall, D. B.: 1979, ‘Trace Metals in Seaducks of the Fraser River Delta Intertidal Area, British Columbia’, Mar. Pollut. Bull. 10, 189–193.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1991

Authors and Affiliations

  • Harry M. Ohlendorf
    • 1
    • 2
  • Katherine C. Marois
    • 1
    • 2
  • Roy W. Lowe
    • 4
  • Thomas E. Harvey
    • 4
  • Paul R. Kelly
    • 7
  1. 1.U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Patuxent Wildlife Research CenterPacific Coast Research StationUSA
  2. 2.Department of Wildlife and Fisheries BiologyUniversity of CaliforniaDavisUSA
  3. 3.CH2M HillSacramentoUSA
  4. 4.U.S. Fish and Wildlife ServiceSan Francisco Bay National Wildlife RefugeNewarkUSA
  5. 5.U.S. Fish and Wildlife ServiceHatfield Marine Science CenterNewportUSA
  6. 6.U.S. Fish and Wildlife ServiceSacramentoUSA
  7. 7.California Department of Fish and GameYountvilleUSA
  8. 8.California Department of Fish and GameNon-game Heritage ProgramSacramentoUSA

Personalised recommendations