Planta

, Volume 175, Issue 4, pp 471–477 | Cite as

Photoprotection of phytochrome

  • Harry Smith
  • G. Michael Jackson
  • Garry C. Whitelam
Article

Abstract

High-fluence-rate white light is shown to retard the degradation of phytochrome in etiolated seedlings of four different species: Amaranthus caudatus, Phaseolus radiatus (mung bean), Pisum sativum (garden pea), and Avena sativa (oat). In Amaranthus, a high photon fluence rate (approx. 1000 μmol · m-2 · s-1) preserved nearly 50% of the total phytochrome over a period of 5 h; at 3 μmol · m-2 · s-1, less than 8% remained over the same period. Kinetics of the loss of total phytochrome could be interpreted in terms of two populations, one with rapid, and one with slow, turnover rates. A log-linear relationship between fluence rate and proportion of slowly degrading phytochrome was observed; a similar relationship between fluence rate and the amount of phytochrome remaining after a 5-h light treatment was seen. In mung bean, although two populations of differing degradation rates were not resolvable, a similar log-linear relationship between fluence rate and amount remaining after a standard light treatment was evident. Detailed kinetic analyses were not performed with peas and oats, but comparisons of low and high fluence rates demonstrated that photoprotection was similarly effective in these species. In Amaranthus, transfer from high to low fluence rate was accompanied by a rapid increase in degradation rate, indicating that the retarding effect of high-fluence-rate light is not a consequence of the disablement of the degradative machinery.

Immunochemical analyses confirmed the existence of photoprotection in all four species, and allowed the extension of the observations to periods of light treatment during which substantial chlorophyll production occurred. Considerable photoprotection was observed in oat seedlings exposed to summer sunlight. These results are interpreted in terms of the accumulation under high fluence rates of photoconversion intermediates not available to the degradative machinery which is specific for the far-red-absorbing form of phytochrome.

Key words

Light and phytochrome Phytochrome: degradation and photoprotection 

Abbreviations

Pfr

far-red absorbing form of phytochrome

Po

amount of phytochrome measured at time zero

Pt

amount of phytochrome measured at time t

Ptot

total phytochrome

WL

white light

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Abe, H., Yamamoto, K.T., Nagatani, A., Furuya, M. (1985) Characterization of green tissue-specific phytochrome isolated immunochemically from pea seedlings. Plant Cell Physiol. 26, 1387–1399Google Scholar
  2. Bliss, D., Smith, H. (1986) Penetration of light into soil and its role in the control of seed germination. Plant Cell Environ. 8, 475–483Google Scholar
  3. Brockmann, J., Schäfer, E. (1982) Analysis of Pfr destruction in Amaranthus caudatus L. — evidence for two pools of phytochrome. Photochem. Photobiol. 35, 555–558Google Scholar
  4. Butler, W.L., Lane, H.C. (1965) Dark transformations of phytochrome in vivo. II. Plant Physiol. 40, 13–17Google Scholar
  5. Fukshansky, L., Schäfer, E. (1983) Models in photomorphogenesis. In: Encyclopaedia of plant physiology N.S., vol. 16A: Photomorphogenesis, pp. 69–95, Shropshire, W., Jr., Mohr, E., eds. Springer, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  6. Heim, B., Jabben, M., Schäfer, E. (1981) Phytochrome destruction in dark- and light-grown Amaranthus caudatus seedlings. Photochem. Photobiol. 34, 89–93Google Scholar
  7. Kendrick, R.E., Frankland, B. (1968) Kinetics of phytochrome decay in Amaranthus seedlings. Planta 82, 317–320Google Scholar
  8. Kendrick, R.E., Spruit, C.J.P. (1972) Light maintains high levels of phytochrome intermediates. Nature 237, 281–282Google Scholar
  9. Kendrick, R.E., Spruit, C.J.P. (1973) Phytochrome intermediates in vivo. I. Effects of temperature, light intensity, wave-length, and oxygen on intermediate accumulation. Photochem. Photobiol. 18, 1349–144Google Scholar
  10. Kendrick, R.E., Spruit, C.J.P. (1977) Phototransformations of phytochrome. Photochem. Photobiol. 26, 201–204Google Scholar
  11. Mandoli, D.F., Waldron, L., Nemson, J.A., Briggs, W.R. (1982) Soil light transmission: implications for phytochrome-mediated responses. Carnegie Instn. Washington Yearb. 81, 32–34Google Scholar
  12. McCurdy, D.W., Pratt, L.H. (1986a) Kinetics of intracellular redistribution of phytochrome in Avena coleoptiles after its conversion to the active, far-red-absorbing form. Planta 167, 330–336Google Scholar
  13. McCurdy, D.W., Pratt, L.H. (1986b) Immunogold electron microscopy of phytochrome in Avena: Identification of intracellular sites responsible for phytochrome sequestering and enhanced pelletability. J. Cell Biol. 103, 2541–2550Google Scholar
  14. Speth, V., Otto, V., Schäfer, E. (1986) Intracellular localisation of phytochrome in oat coleoptiles by electron microscopy. Planta 168, 299–304Google Scholar
  15. Rüdiger, W. (1980) Phytochrome, a light receptor of photomorphogenesis. In: Structure and bonding, vol. 40, pp. 101–140, Hemmerich, P., ed. Springer, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  16. Shimazaki, Y., Pratt, L.H. (1985) Immunochemical detection with rabbit polyclonal and mouse monoclonal antibodies of different pools of phytochrome from etiolated and green Avena shoots. Planta 164, 333–344Google Scholar
  17. Tester, M., Morris, C. (1987) The penetration of light through soil. Plant Cell Environ. 10, 281–286Google Scholar
  18. Tokuhisa, J.G., Daniels, S.M., Quail, P.H. (1985) Phytochrome in green tissue: Spectral and immunochemical evidence for two distinct molecular species of phytochrome in light-grown Avena sativa. Planta 164, 321–332Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1988

Authors and Affiliations

  • Harry Smith
    • 1
  • G. Michael Jackson
    • 1
  • Garry C. Whitelam
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of BotanyUniversity of LeicesterLeicesterUK

Personalised recommendations