Marine Biology

, Volume 88, Issue 1, pp 33–42 | Cite as

Elemental sulfur in the gills of three species of clams containing chemoautotrophic symbiotic bacteria: a possible inorganic energy storage compound

  • R. D. Vetter


Sulfur content and fine structure were studied for tissues of three species of clams, Lucinoma annulata, Calyptogena elongata and Lucina floridana, which inhabit sulfide-rich environments and whose gills harbor symbiotic sulfur bacteria. Lucinoma annulata and C. elongata were dredged from the Santa Barbara basin, California, USA, at a depth of 480 to 490 m, and Lucina floridana were dug from below the roots of seagrasses in Saint Joseph Bay, Florida, at a depth of 0.25 to 2m. Foot tissue of Lucinoma annulata, without symbionts, had a total sulfur content of 1.4±0.1 (SD) mg 100 mg-1 dry weight of tissue (%DW). The symbiont-containing gill tissue of different individuals of L. annulata varied in color from dark red to pale yellow, and the total sulfur content was 2.5±0.4% DW in red gills and was 5.6±3.3 % DW in the yellowest gills. Maintenance of L. annulata in the laboratory for 21 d in the absence of sulfide resulted in the loss from the gill of yellow deposits which were elemental sulfur in the form of liquid-crystalline sulfur globules rather than solid orthorhombic sulfur crystals. The foot tissue did not contain elemental sulfur. When examined by freeze-etch microscopy, sulfur globules were found only within bacteria and not in the animal host cytoplasm. Sulfur globules were confined to the periplasmic space of the bacteria. C. elongata and Lucina floridana resembled Lucinoma annulata in the physical form and distribution of elemental sulfur. The absence of elemental sulfur in the animal cytoplasm suggests that its formation from sulfide is not a detoxification scheme to protect animal tissue from sulfide toxicity. The sulfur deposits probably represent inorganic energy reserves that permit the symbiotic bacteria to function even during the temporary absence of external sulfide.


Gill Tissue Symbiotic Bacterium Total Sulfur Content Sulfur Crystal Host Cytoplasm 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literature cited

  1. Cavanaugh, C. M., S. L. Gardner, M. L., Jones, H. J. Jannasch and J. B. Waterbury: Procaryotic cells in the hydrothermal vent tube worm Riftia pachyptila Jones: possible chemoautotrophic symbionts. Science, N.Y. 213, 340–342 (1981)Google Scholar
  2. Chen, K. Y. and J. C. Morris: Kinetics of oxidation of aqueous sulfide by O2. Envir. Sci. Technol. 6, 529–537 (1972)Google Scholar
  3. Childress, J. J., A. J. Arp and C. R. Fisher, Jr.: Metabolic and blood characteristics in the hydrothermal vent tube-worm Riftia pachyptila. Mar. Biol. 83, 109–124 (1984)Google Scholar
  4. Felbeck, H.: Sulfide oxidation and carbon fixation by the gutless clam Solemya reidi: an animal-bacteria symbiosis. J. comp. Physiol. 152, 3–11 (1983)Google Scholar
  5. Felbeck, H., J. J. Childress and G. N. Somero: Calvin-Benson ycle and sulphide oxidation enzymes in animals from sulphide rich habitats. Nature, Lond. 293, 291–293 (1981)Google Scholar
  6. Fisher, M. R. and S. J., Hand: Chemoautotrophic symbionts in the bivalve Lucina floridana from seagrass beds. Biol. Bull. mar. biol. Lab., Woods Hole 167, 445–459 (1984)Google Scholar
  7. Hageage, G. J., E. D. Eanes and R. L. Gherna: X-ray diffraction studies of the sulfur globules accumulated by Chromatium species. J. Bact. 101, 464–469 (1970)Google Scholar
  8. Hand, S. C., and G. N. Somero: Energy metabolism pathways of hydrothermal vent animals: adaptations to a food-rich and sulfide-rich deep-sea environment. Biol. Bull. mar. biol. Lab., Woods Hole 165, 167–181 (1983)Google Scholar
  9. Holt, S. C., J. M. Schively and J. W. Greenawalt: Fine structure of selected species of the genus Thiobacillus as revealed by chemical fixation and freeze-etching. Can. J. Microbiol. 20, 1347–1351 (1974)Google Scholar
  10. Jannasch, H. W.: Chemosynthesis: the nutritional basis for life at deep-sea vents. Oceanus 27, 73–78 (1984)Google Scholar
  11. Jones, M. L.: Riftia pachyptila Jones: Observations on the vestimentiferan worm from the Galápagos Rift. Science, N.Y. 213, 333–336 (1981)Google Scholar
  12. Jørgensen, B. B.: Ecology of the bacteria of the sulfur cycle with special reference to anoxic-oxic interface environments. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. (Ser. B) 298, 543–561 (1983)Google Scholar
  13. Jørgensen, B. B. and N. P. Revsbech: Colorless sulfur bacteria, Beggiatoa spp. and Thiovulum spp., on O2 and H2S microgradients. Appl. envirl. Microbiol 45, 1261–1270 (1983)Google Scholar
  14. Kaplan, I. R., K. O. Emery and S. C. Rittenberg: The distribution and isotopic abundance of sulphur in recent marine sediments off southern California. Geochim. cosmochim. Acta 27, 297–331 (1963)Google Scholar
  15. Lawrey, N. H., V. Jani and T. E. Jensen: Identification of the sulfur inclusion body in Beggiatoa alba B18LD by energy-dispersive X-ray microanalysis. Curr. Microbiol. 6, 71–74 (1981)Google Scholar
  16. Moriarty, D. J. W. and D. J. D. Nicholas: Products of sulphide oxidation in extracts of Thiobacillus concretivorus. Biochim. biophys. Acta 197, 143–151 (1970)Google Scholar
  17. National Research Council: Hydrogen sulfide, 183 pp. Baltimore: University Park Press 1979. (Committee on Medican and Biological Effects of Environmental Pollutants, Subcommittee on Hydrogen Sulfide; Division of Medical Sciences, Assembly of Life Sciences)Google Scholar
  18. Nicolson, G. L. and G. L. Schmidt: Structure of the Chromatium sulfur particle and its protein membrance. J. Bact. 105, 1142–1148 (1971)Google Scholar
  19. Powell, M. and G. N. Somero: Blood components prevent sulfide poisoning of respiration of the hydrothermal vent tube worm Riftia pachyptila. Science, N.Y. 219, 297–299 (1983)Google Scholar
  20. Reid, R. G.: Aspects of the biology of a gutless species of Solemya (Bivalvia: Protobranchia). Can. J. Zool. 58, 386–393 (1980)Google Scholar
  21. Remsen, C. C.: Comparative subcellular architecture of photosynthetic bacteria. In: The photosynthetic bacteria, pp 31–60. Ed. by R. K. Clayton and W. R. Sistrom. New York: Plenum Press 1978Google Scholar
  22. Schedel, M. and H. Trüper: Anaerobic oxidation of thiosulfate and elemental sulfur in Thiobacillus denitrificans. Archs, Microbiol. 124, 205–210 (1980)Google Scholar
  23. Schmidt, G. L., G. L. Nicolson and M. D. Kamen: Composition of the sulfur particle of Chromatium vinosum strain D. J. Bact. 105, 1137–1141 (1971)Google Scholar
  24. Strohl, W. R., I. Geffers and J. M. Larkin: Structure of the sulfur inclusion envelopes from four Beggiatoas. Curr. Microbiol. 6, 75–79 (1981)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1985

Authors and Affiliations

  • R. D. Vetter
    • 1
  1. 1.Marine Biology Research Division, A-002Scripps Institution of OceanographyLa JollaUSA

Personalised recommendations